Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Netwrix Auditor vs SUSAN by ServQual-Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Netwrix Auditor
Ranking in GRC
11th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (29th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (15th), Active Directory Management (3rd)
SUSAN by ServQual-Security
Ranking in GRC
16th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AI Security (122nd)
 

Featured Reviews

RishiPandit - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead - Technical Services at Impetus
Optimizing time and effort through comprehensive auditing features
Netwrix Auditor doesn't have many competitors at the level in which it is placed. All other companies provide auditing solutions but not up to the feature list; it is very broad and robust. The best features include flexibility to interact directly with MS-SQL. Real-time alerts help identify potential security threats. The ability to streamline audits with insights into configuration states is helpful, as the access reviews and audit reports are really insightful. This is a good tool. The search functionality is available, but comparative to other vendors, this is a bit slower. Reports are effective; the compliance reports and all the reports are very insightful. That is good.
reviewer2763861 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Cara Jewellers
Has transformed how we detect and prioritize security risks across our environment
The Security Incident Score is arguably the most valuable feature. It immediately highlights critical gaps and weaknesses in our current security structure, allowing us to not just react to incidents, but to proactively identify and continuously improve our controls. It has been an essential metric for measuring and driving security posture improvement across all our compliance domains.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Netwrix Auditor?
The most valuable features of Netwrix Auditor are its affordability compared to similar products and its comprehensive monitoring of admin activities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netwrix Auditor?
I don't know about the pricing of this, but it is good at this price point because our organization has purchased it, which means it was in budget. We usually do not buy expensive solutions, so the...
What needs improvement with Netwrix Auditor?
The areas of improvement include the front end, as the UI should be more intuitive and there should be fewer bugs. In the UI, we have to adjust and resize our console many times, and sometimes it a...
What needs improvement with SUSAN by ServQual-Security?
The Auditor Option view access needs to be separated.
What is your primary use case for SUSAN by ServQual-Security?
SUSAN has been a game-changer for our Security Operations Center (SOC). The ability to seamlessly integrate with our existing infrastructure—specifically our firewall and endpoint protection soluti...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AT&T, SanDisk, Siemens, Verizon, Electrolux, Allianz, Societe Generale
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Auditor vs. SUSAN by ServQual-Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.