Netwrix Auditor vs OpenText Behavioral Signals comparison

Netwrix and OpenText are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Netwrix is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.5, while OpenText is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.0. Netwrix holds a 0.6% mindshare in SIEM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Netwrix Auditor

Read 8 Netwrix Auditor reviews

1,885 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Read 5 OpenText Behavioral Signals reviews

818 Views
654 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Netwrix Auditor

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Behavioral Signals and Netwrix Auditor compete in data management and analytics. OpenText Behavioral Signals has the upper hand with advanced analytics, providing deep insights. Netwrix Auditor excels with robust auditing for compliance and security.

Features: OpenText Behavioral Signals provides advanced data analytics, predictive analytics, and sophisticated data interpretation to enhance decision-making processes. Netwrix Auditor offers real-time monitoring, risk analysis with clear reports, and maintains comprehensive audit logs, crucial for security and compliance.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Behavioral Signals could improve its configurability options and integration capabilities. Enhancements in interface customization and reducing the complexity of analytics tools are needed. Netwrix Auditor could improve its search functionality, speed, and customization of notifications, along with enhancing user interface adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Behavioral Signals provides streamlined deployment with comprehensive support, enabling quick integration. Netwrix Auditor has a more complex deployment but offers thorough documentation and support, vital for organizations with intricate security needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Behavioral Signals has higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI through advanced analytics. Netwrix Auditor provides competitive pricing, with excellent ROI from robust security features, offering a cost-effective choice for compliance risk mitigation.

To learn more, read our detailed Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netwrix Auditor

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

27th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (11th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (16th), Active Directory Management (3rd)

OpenText Behavioral Signals

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Netwrix Auditor is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Behavioral Signals is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Netwrix Auditor	0.6%
OpenText Behavioral Signals	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

RishiPandit

Lead - Technical Services at Impetus

Optimizing time and effort through comprehensive auditing features

Netwrix Auditor doesn't have many competitors at the level in which it is placed. All other companies provide auditing solutions but not up to the feature list; it is very broad and robust. The best features include flexibility to interact directly with MS-SQL. Real-time alerts help identify potential security threats. The ability to streamline audits with insights into configuration states is helpful, as the access reviews and audit reports are really insightful. This is a good tool. The search functionality is available, but comparative to other vendors, this is a bit slower. Reports are effective; the compliance reports and all the reports are very insightful. That is good.

Read full review

Pravir KumarSinha

Information Security at Synechron

Has essential threat detection capabilities, but the features for intelligence need enhancement

We integrated this tool with our security infrastructure. We installed it on a Linux server, where we have a Logger and ESM installed. With the Linux server as the hub, we manage all the configurations and rules, including those for email triggers. The logs are routed through a connector to the Logger, allowing us to monitor our infrastructure effectively. The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities. I recommend it to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool's reporting feature and notifications."

"Netwrix Auditor doesn't have many competitors at the level in which it is placed; all other companies provide auditing solutions but not up to the feature list—it is very broad and robust."

"What I find the most valuable about Netwrix Auditor is the way it shows risk. The reports are very clear."

"It maintains audit logs for the duration of time that you wish, as long as you have the storage capacity to do so."

"Netwrix provides features that no other solution on the market does."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time monitoring."

"The most valuable features of Netwrix Auditor are its affordability compared to similar products and its comprehensive monitoring of admin activities."

"I have found user behavior analysis and the ability to run risk assessments important features. Additionally, the interface and online documentation are very good."

"The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities."

"The ability to tailor an environment to suit our specific use cases is a major advantage of ArcSight compared to other logging servers such as Splunk."

"The product has a valuable interface."

"We found the correlation engine to be very good. It takes logs from different types of devices and does the correlation in a good way."

"The most valuable feature of ArcSight Intelligence is a single console where the entire dashboard gives all the connected details in a single place."

Cons

"I expect usability features to become more refined over time. I'm interested to see how it evolves and continues to improve."

"There is room for improvements when it comes to the licensing."

"An improvement would be if there was an another way to manage the logs besides email because it's not so practical."

"When there are issues I would like remediation to be in one place."

"The solution lacks self-service on password reset. It also needs to improve its scalability."

"There is room for improvement with the introduction of AI functionality."

"The Linux compatibility of this solution could be improved."

"In the UI, we have to adjust and resize our console many times, and sometimes it appears, sometimes you have to close and open it, and sometimes it does not give a scroll bar to navigate."

More Netwrix Auditor cons

"ArcSight Intelligence is a bit slower, and its speed should be improved."

"ArcSight Intelligence's pricing needs improvement."

"The frequency of the updates that we are getting can be improved because the number and types of incidents that are happening at the global level are far more than what we are receiving. The frequency of updates feeds related to our rules should be increased. There should be more frequent information about the new rules that are coming and the global threats that are happening. There should be better options for dashboard creation. At present, the dashboards are good, but there is scope to make them better."

"The dashboard is not user-friendly and is in black and white."

"We haven't found the product fully scalable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license for this solution and we are on an annual license. The price is reasonable."

"The tool's price is fair."

"This solution is reasonably priced. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"They offer perpetual licenses for the product."

"The solution is expensive and only suitable for enterprise environments."

"It is an expensive platform."

"Its price is average and not very high. Splunk might be a bit cheaper than this. Its licensing is on a monthly basis."

"ArcSight Intelligence is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user186927

Director of Operations at Bell

Feb 16, 2015

Cybereason vs. Interset vs. SQRRL

Capture DB - they all use NoSQL db and hence solve the ad hoc query and 'go back in time' problem with current best of breed SIEM and DLP solutions that rely on real time analysis of incoming logs (and don't store them). This means deeper and quicker iterative threat analysis and assessment…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Government

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Netwrix Auditor?

The most valuable features of Netwrix Auditor are its affordability compared to similar products and its comprehensive monitoring of admin activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netwrix Auditor?

I don't know about the pricing of this, but it is good at this price point because our organization has purchased it, which means it was in budget. We usually do not buy expensive solutions, so the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netwrix Auditor?

The areas of improvement include the front end, as the UI should be more intuitive and there should be fewer bugs. In the UI, we have to adjust and resize our console many times, and sometimes it a...

See all answers

What do you like most about ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

The platform helps us improve threat detection capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

They offer perpetual licenses for the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ArcSight Interset / Intelligence?

The product could be improved in several areas; it currently requires significant enhancement. Compared to QRadar and Splunk, ArcSight Intelligence falls behind, placing it as the third choice amon...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 16% of the time

Change Auditor for Active Directory vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine ADAudit Plus vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 12% of the time

Lepide vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 7% of the time

More Netwrix Auditor Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Helix Connect vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs OpenText Behavioral Signals

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Behavioral Signals Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Auditor

September 2025

Download Netwrix Auditor product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

September 2025

Download OpenText Behavioral Signals product report

Also Known As

No data available

ArcSight Interset / Intelligence, FileTrek, Interset UEBA, Micro Focus Interset UEBA, Micro Focus Interset, ArcSight Interset

Overview

Netwrix Auditor is a security-focused solution that monitors IT environments by tracking changes, ensuring compliance, and enhancing visibility into user activities. It offers detailed auditing, real-time alerts, and robust reporting tools. Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features boost efficiency, productivity, and organizational growth.

Netwrix

OpenText Behavioral Signals enhances organizational security monitoring with its robust correlation engine and streamlined dashboard, offering customization to suit different environments like airports or banks.

OpenText Behavioral Signals effectively integrates device logs through its strong correlation engine. The platform's customization options enable tailored alerts to match specific use cases, such as airports or banks. Although it needs more frequent updates to stay aligned with global incidents, it provides a centralized dashboard that ensures comprehensive visibility across networks. Users find the interface intuitive, making rule writing and report access easy, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the network environment.

What are the key features of OpenText Behavioral Signals?

Correlation Engine: Integrates logs from diverse devices for seamless analysis.
Customization: Tailors alerts based on specific industry needs such as banks.
Centralized Dashboard: Offers complete visibility into network activities.
Easy Rule Writing: Facilitates enhanced usability for users.
Intuitive Interface: Provides streamlined access to reports and insights.

What benefits should businesses expect when using OpenText Behavioral Signals?

Increased Security: Effective monitoring and alerts enhance network safety.
Global Intelligence Gathering: Access to global attack notifications keeps organizations informed.
Reduced False Positives: Improved accuracy in detecting genuine threats.
Improved Log Management: Efficient handling of security and network device logs.

In industries like banking and airports, OpenText Behavioral Signals is implemented for gathering global intelligence from the cloud. It notifies organizations about global attacks and updates its correlation engines. These industries utilize the platform for monitoring and analyzing logs from network devices, security log management, and addressing network challenges like link failures and unauthorized login attempts, ensuring better security posture with behavioral analytics and log integration using Unix and Microsoft-based connectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

AT&T, SanDisk, Siemens, Verizon, Electrolux, Allianz, Societe Generale

Accuvant, Splunk Inc., NuTech, Box, rSolutions, Voodoo Technology Limited

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

September 2025

Free Report: Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals

Find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Netwrix Auditor vs. OpenText Behavioral Signals report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.