NetApp Cloud Sync vs StreamSets comparison

NetApp and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Sync

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Sync reviews

635 Views
324 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StreamSets

Read 21 StreamSets reviews

4,142 Views
3,189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Sync

StreamSets

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetApp Cloud Sync and StreamSets based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Sync

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (22nd)

StreamSets

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (24th)

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Singh Bisht

Server Administrator at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Hybrid data sync has minimized downtime and supports large cloud migrations efficiently

NetApp Cloud Sync is a very good product. When it comes to improvement, more detailed reporting and analytics can be available with richer dashboards for transfer performance, bandwidth usage, failed files, and historic trends. Smart handling of errors, such as clearer explanations for failed syncs and more actionable troubleshoot guidance, is needed as well. More granular scheduling and policy controls such as advanced filtering, bandwidth throttling by time of day, and finer control over sync behavior are also areas for improvement. Expanding cloud and storage integration would make it easier to connect to additional storage platforms and emerging cloud services. Lower source storage usage for the data broker and improved performance when synchronizing very large file systems containing millions of small files would be beneficial. Lastly, more automation options such as richer API and webhooks for tighter integration with infrastructure as code or DevOps workflows are also needed.

Read full review

SrinivasanSankar

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Enables effective batch loading with visual interface and enterprise support

One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure. I had to switch to a new EC2 box, even though the processor was not fully utilized. It would be beneficial if StreamSets addressed any potential memory leak issues to prevent unnecessary upgrades. Additionally, it would be a great enhancement if StreamSets could produce a lineage graph to visualize how the data has passed through the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer support for NetApp Cloud Sync is very good; support is provided immediately, and issues are resolved very quickly."

"NetApp Cloud Sync has impacted my organization positively by significantly reducing downtime."

"Personally, the best features in NetApp Cloud Sync are its simplicity and trustworthiness."

"Also, the intuitive canvas for designing all the streams in the pipeline, along with the simplicity of the entire product are very big pluses for me. The software is very simple and straightforward. That is something that is needed right now."

"I really appreciate the numerous ready connectors available on both the source and target sides, the support for various media file formats, and the ease of configuring and managing pipelines centrally."

"In StreamSets, everything is in one place."

"One of the things I like is the data pipelines. They have a very good design. Implementing pipelines is very straightforward. It doesn't require any technical skill."

"This product was a lot easier to use than the one we had before it, and it took us half an hour and we were set up and running it the first time."

"I have used Data Collector, Transformer, and Control Hub products from StreamSets. What I really like about these products is that they're very user-friendly. People who are not from a technological or core development background find it easy to get started and build data pipelines and connect to the databases. They would be comfortable like any technical person within a couple of weeks."

"It is really easy to set up and the interface is easy to use."

"StreamSets' reusable assets have helped to reduce workload by 32% to 40%."

More StreamSets pros

Cons

"When it comes to improvement, more detailed reporting and analytics can be available with richer dashboards for transfer performance, bandwidth usage, failed files, and historic trends."

"A big drawback on the NetApp side is that because we started encountering remote home workers in our infrastructure, we started to encounter multiple incidents or requests for improvement related to latency."

"Sometimes, it is not clear at first how to set up nodes. A site with an explanation of how each node works would be very helpful."

"If you use JDBC Lookup, for example, it generally takes a long time to process data."

"The execution engine could be improved. When I was at their session, they were using some obscure platform to run. There is a controller, which controls what happens on that, but you should be able to easily do this at any of the cloud services, such as Google Cloud. You shouldn't have any issues in terms of how to run it with their online development platform or design platform, basically their execution engine. There are issues with that."

"There aren't enough hands-on labs, and debugging is also an issue because it takes a lot of time. Logs are not that clear when you are debugging, and you can only select a single source for a pipeline."

"Visualization and monitoring need to be improved and refined."

"The logging mechanism could be improved. If I am working on a pipeline, then create a job out of it and it is running, it will generate constant logs. So, the logging mechanism could be simplified. Now, it is a bit difficult to understand and filter the logs. It takes some time."

"Currently, we can only use the query to read data from SAP HANA. What we would like to see, as soon as possible, is the ability to read from multiple tables from SAP HANA. That would be a really good thing that we could use immediately. For example, if you have 100 tables in SQL Server or Oracle, then you could just point it to the schema or the 100 tables and ingestion information. However, you can't do that in SAP HANA since StreamSets currently is lacking in this. They do not have a multi-table feature for SAP HANA. Therefore, a multi-table origin for SAP HANA would be helpful."

"The software is very good overall. Areas for improvement are the error logging and the version history. I would like to see better, more detailed error logging information."

More StreamSets cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are two editions, Professional and Enterprise, and there is a free trial. We're using the Professional edition and it is competitively priced."

"I believe the pricing is not equitable."

"The licensing is expensive, and there are other costs involved too. I know from using the software that you have to buy new features whenever there are new updates, which I don't really like. But initially, it was very good."

"It's not so favorable for small companies."

"The pricing is too fixed. It should be based on how much data you need to process. Some businesses are not so big that they process a lot of data."

"StreamSets is an expensive solution."

"StreamSets Data Collector is open source. One can utilize the StreamSets Data Collector, but the Control Hub is the main repository where all the jobs are present. Everything happens in Control Hub."

"We are running the community version right now, which can be used free of charge."

More StreamSets pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Sync?

I did not come across any drawbacks or downsides in NetApp Cloud Sync technology. This is good technology, but on the NetApp side, because we are working with file services and we are primarily usi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Sync?

The company uses NetApp Cloud Sync for synchronizing on-premises file servers with Azure Cloud, hosting NetApp file servers on various storage arrays, either physical or virtual as VMware VMs. This...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NetApp Cloud Sync?

NetApp Cloud Sync is deployed through Azure Cloud, and this is the only architecture that we have. We do not have any other vendors in the cloud to do this with NetApp. So this is our standardizati...

See all answers

What needs improvement with StreamSets?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StreamSets?

We are using StreamSets for batch loading.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering StreamSets?

If asked, I definitely recommend StreamSets to other users. My overall rating for the solution is nine.

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Talend Cloud vs NetApp Cloud Sync

Compared 100% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Sync Competitors

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs StreamSets

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Confluent vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

More StreamSets Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

July 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Sync product report

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets

July 2026

Download StreamSets product report

Overview

NetApp Cloud Sync is a robust solution for data synchronization between on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring efficient and real-time data transfer that supports critical workloads and processes.

NetApp Cloud Sync provides seamless data synchronization, helping organizations manage and migrate data efficiently. Compatible with multiple storage environments, it reduces complexity and enhances data accessibility. Users find it instrumental in maintaining data consistency and achieving cloud migration goals. Its scalable architecture supports varied data transfer scenarios, making it a reliable choice for enterprise needs.

What are the most important features of NetApp Cloud Sync?

Automated Data Synchronization: Ensures consistent and real-time data updates across environments.
Multi-Cloud Compatibility: Supports integration with different cloud providers, enhancing flexibility.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to changing data sizes and demands without compromising performance.
Secure Data Transfers: Implements strong encryption protocols for data integrity and security.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines data management tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Cost-Effective: Optimizes data transfer processes, lowering operational costs.
Enhanced Data Accessibility: Provides quick access to data from any location, aiding decision-making.
Time Savings: Reduces the time needed for complex data migration activities.

NetApp Cloud Sync is widely implemented in industries like finance, healthcare, and retail to facilitate data migration to the cloud. Its adaptability and robust performance in managing large datasets make it ideal for these sectors, where data accessibility and integrity are crucial for operations.

NetApp

StreamSets streamlines data pipeline creation, connecting data from multiple sources to destinations like cloud platforms with minimal coding. Its centralized platform and intuitive design enhance ETL and data migration processes.

StreamSets integrates seamlessly with analytics platforms, offering tools such as Data Collector and Control Hub to facilitate data ingestion, transformation, and machine learning integrations. Its user-friendly interface and ready connectors aid in configuring complex data pipelines. With built-in data drift resilience and scheduling options, users experience efficient, scalable data management, despite challenges like latency in cloud storage and interface enhancement needs. Users often employ StreamSets for batch loading, real-time data processing, and smart data pipeline management, offering comprehensive data integration solutions.

What are the key features of StreamSets?

Data Collector: Enables streamlined data collection and processing.
Control Hub: Centralizes management of data pipelines.
Minimal Coding: Simplifies pipeline configuration with limited code requirement.
Data Drift Resilience: Adapts to changes in data patterns effectively.

What benefits should users look for?

Time-Saving: Efficient processes reduce manual effort.
Scalability: Easily manages large datasets.
Integration: Connects with leading analytics and cloud platforms.
Real-Time Processing: Supports continuous data delivery for timely insights.

In industries like finance and technology, StreamSets supports data migration, machine learning integrations, and analytics by simplifying data transformation and enhancing decision-making capabilities through its robust pipeline management.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Availity, BT Group, Humana, Deluxe, GSK, RingCentral, IBM, Shell, SamTrans, State of Ohio, TalentFulfilled, TechBridge

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets

August 2026

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Sync vs. StreamSets report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.