Nagios Core vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor comparison

Nagios and Power Admin are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Nagios is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Power Admin is ranked #73. Nagios holds a 3.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Power Admin’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Power Admin users who would recommend it.

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,039 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Read 2 Power Admin PA Server Monitor reviews

204 Views
37 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Power Admin PA Server Monitor and Nagios Core compete in the network monitoring space. Power Admin PA Server Monitor stands out for its customer service and support, while Nagios Core is favored for its customization capabilities.

Features: Power Admin PA Server Monitor includes real-time monitoring, alerting, and an easy-to-navigate interface. Nagios Core comes with extensive plugin support, adaptability, and a strong backing by a large community.

Room for Improvement: Power Admin PA Server Monitor could enhance its customization options, expand its community support, and offer more flexibility. Nagios Core would benefit from a more straightforward user interface, simplified deployment process, and improved direct support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Power Admin PA Server Monitor is known for a simple deployment process and responsive customer service, appealing to organizations needing quick implementation. Nagios Core, while offering a more complex deployment, benefits from a vast community and knowledge base that supports its users through setup and troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Power Admin PA Server Monitor offers a clear pricing model, ensuring predictable costs and a defined ROI. Open-source Nagios Core may save on software costs but could result in higher indirect expenses for customization and setup, impacting the ROI for organizations without technical expertise.

To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (10th)

Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

73rd

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (40th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Power Admin PA Server Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

it_user225771

IT Network Engineer at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

The setup is straightforward, but the satellite service installation file could be separated from the server one.

* The status overview page provides a state of computers monitored and provides quickly what users need to focus on * The satellite service installed on remote computers is an easy way to add clients, plus it's easy to deploy and to configure * The licence is perpetual and not linked to one computer, so it's possible to remove a licence from one computer and use it on another with no extra cost

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 12% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Nagios Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 52% of the time

Nagios XI vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 25% of the time

Zabbix vs Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Compared 23% of the time

More Power Admin PA Server Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

June 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

June 2025

Download Power Admin PA Server Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

PA Server Monitor

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is used for tracking server performance, monitoring disk space, and managing network devices. It helps in generating alerts for system downtimes and potential issues, enhancing system reliability. Users appreciate its ease of installation, configuration, and monitoring of critical IT infrastructure and services.

With Power Admin PA Server Monitor, users benefit from comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including real-time performance tracking and customizable dashboards. It effectively provides resource usage insights, contributing significantly to system management. Despite its strengths, users noted areas for improvement, such as better documentation, more intuitive configuration, and enhanced customer support response times. Performance issues during high-demand periods and the need for more comprehensive alert options were also mentioned. Enhanced reporting features and additional integration capabilities with other systems would further improve user experience.

What are the most important features of Power Admin PA Server Monitor?

Alerting and Notifications: Provides instant alerts to address system downtimes and potential issues promptly.
Flexible Reporting: Offers detailed reports that help in analyzing system performance and trends.
Easy Installation: Users find the setup process straightforward, saving time and effort.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Monitors server performance, disk space, and network devices effectively.
Real-Time Performance Tracking: Allows continuous monitoring of system performance and resource usage.
Customizable Dashboards: Users can tailor dashboards to display relevant information and metrics.

What are the benefits or ROI when evaluating Power Admin PA Server Monitor?

Improved System Reliability: Helps maintain system uptime by alerting users to potential issues.
Effective Resource Management: Provides insights into resource usage, enabling better management.
Time Efficiency: Easy installation and intuitive configuration save time in system management.
Enhanced Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring capabilities ensure all critical aspects are covered.

Power Admin PA Server Monitor is implemented across industries like IT services, education, healthcare, and finance, where reliable system performance and uptime are crucial. Its ability to track server performance, monitor disk space, and manage network devices makes it an invaluable tool for these sectors, ensuring their critical infrastructure operates smoothly.

Power Admin

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Sauder Woodworking, Symantec, Microsoft, Skull Candy, NASA, Xerox, Chevron

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

June 2025

Free Report: Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nagios Core vs. Power Admin PA Server Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.