MuleSoft Composer vs Teradata comparison

Read 76 Teradata reviews

10,676 Views
854 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Teradata and MuleSoft Composer are competing in the data management and integration space. MuleSoft Composer seems to have the upper hand due to its rich feature set and ease of use, despite Teradata's reputation for robust pricing and support.

Features: Teradata is known for powerful data analytics, scalable data warehousing, and robust performance, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive data handling. MuleSoft Composer shines with its ability to connect diverse applications, flexibility, and efficient data integration suitable for organizations using multiple cloud applications.

Room for Improvement: Teradata could benefit from streamlining its deployment processes to cater to less-resourced environments and enhancing its integration capabilities with modern applications. Additionally, improving its initial cost structure could attract smaller enterprises. MuleSoft Composer could enhance its feature set to handle more complex data management scenarios and improve the ability to manage larger data sets. Expanding integration options further could provide more value to large organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer offers an intuitive deployment model and strong customer service ensuring smooth integration. Teradata, while offering a sophisticated setup best for advanced data management, may require more resources, which could be a barrier for some organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata has higher initial setup costs but offers significant long-term ROI with its comprehensive solutions. MuleSoft Composer, with lower startup costs, delivers quick ROI through efficient integrations and user-friendly operations, aligning well with businesses using multiple cloud applications and seeking faster returns.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Teradata Report (Updated: July 2025).

MuleSoft Composer vs. Teradata

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.6

MuleSoft Composer enhances efficiency, reduces costs, improves time-to-market, and increases value with easy integration and better data accuracy.

Sentiment score

8.1

Teradata boosts analytics speed over 100%, enhancing customer service and satisfaction, with high ROI and user approval.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.3

Users commend MuleSoft Composer's responsive and professional customer service team for efficient problem-solving and quick resolution times.

Sentiment score

7.1

Teradata's customer service is praised for expertise but criticized for delays, with ratings ranging from 6 to 10 out of 10.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

The technical support from Teradata is quite advanced.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Customer support is very good, rated eight out of ten under our essential agreement.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

MuleSoft Composer is highly rated for scalability, efficiently managing varying data volumes and adaptable for organizations of all sizes.

Sentiment score

7.4

Teradata is praised for its scalability, speed, and flexibility, despite some complexity and cost challenges in cloud environments.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

This expansion can occur without incurring downtime or taking systems offline.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Scalability is complex as you need to purchase a license and coordinate with Teradata for additional disk space and CPU.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Users find MuleSoft Composer stable and well-performing, despite occasional glitches quickly resolved by support.

Sentiment score

8.4

Teradata excels in stability with minimal downtime, robust architecture, 99.9% uptime, and reliable performance, despite minor large dataset issues.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

I find the stability to be almost a ten out of ten.

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The workload management and software maturity provide a reliable system.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Room For Improvement

MuleSoft Composer needs better platform integrations, interface, scalability, AI integration, and support for complex data and API sharing challenges.

Teradata users seek better transaction processing, enhanced scalability, modern interface, cloud focus, advanced analytics, and improved support and documentation.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Unlike SQL and Oracle, which have in-built replication capabilities, we don't have similar functionality with Teradata.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Setup Cost

MuleSoft Composer is considered costly, especially in Brazil and India, with users recommending a 20%-30% price reduction.

Teradata's high cost is justified by its superior performance, competitive total ownership costs, and flexible pricing models.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Initially, it may seem expensive compared to similar cloud databases, however, it offers significant value in performance, stability, and overall output once in use.

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Teradata is much more expensive than SQL, which is well-performed and cheaper.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

MuleSoft Composer offers Salesforce integration, ease of use, API sharing, prebuilt connectors, and effective data handling, monitoring, and notifications.

Teradata offers efficient, scalable data management with fast query performance, robust security, automation, and cloud flexibility for businesses.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

The data mover is valuable over the last two years as it allows us to achieve data replication to our disaster recovery systems.

For more quotes and insights, download the Teradata report

Team Leader for Data Base Administrators at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Teradata

Ranking in Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Backup and Recovery (20th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (9th), Marketing Management (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Harnessing advanced parallelism for top performance while embracing cloud trends

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Teradata is primarily used for data warehousing across all customers. My clients have built-in applications that use Teradata, and their use varies from customer to customer, depending on the industry and database size. The primary function is as an OLAP analytical ecosystem Scalability is…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 17% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 16% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 15% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Cloud Data Integration

August 2025

Download Teradata product report

July 2025

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Netflix