Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] comparison

Microsoft Defender XDR and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] are both solutions in the Microsoft Security Suite category. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft Defender XDR users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Defender XDR
Read 101 Microsoft Defender XDR reviews
  • 12,431 Views
  • 3,356 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender XDR and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Microsoft Security Suite solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender XDR
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
101
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (3rd)
Microsoft Entra Permissions...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

Gabor Nyerd - PeerSpot reviewer
Includes four services and four products, which can help organizations a lot
We found that sometimes integrations work, but testing them can take some time. Sometimes, configurations take much longer than expected. We have a configuration in place that needs to be synchronized with another server. However, the servers are four hours apart, so this can cause delays. In general, I believe that the time it takes to configure and test a service should be shorter. Sometimes, it can take a couple of hours to test a single configuration setting. Other times, it is only ten or fifteen minutes, which is normal. However, sometimes, even immediate actions can be triggered by configuration changes, and some settings can take up to eight hours to complete. I believe that this time can be improved. Microsoft is making a lot of improvements to its services in a short period of time. This is a good thing, as it means that the services are constantly being updated and improved. However, it can be challenging for customers to keep up with the changes. For example, a customer may read about an update, understand it, and share it with their colleagues and boss. However, it may take days or weeks to test the update and get the necessary approvals. This can be especially challenging for large customers with many users or machines. In some cases, Microsoft may change a service before the customer has had a chance to implement the previous update. This can be frustrating for customers, as it means that they have to constantly learn new things and adjust their workflows. On the one hand, it is important for Microsoft to keep updating and improving its services. This helps to ensure that the services are meeting the customers' needs and that they are staying ahead of the competition. Microsoft should also be mindful of the challenges that these changes can create for customers. One way to address this challenge is to provide customers with more time to implement changes. Microsoft could also provide more information about upcoming changes so that customers can plan ahead. Ultimately, Microsoft needs to strike a balance between keeping its services up-to-date and providing customers with a smooth transition to new features.
Read full review
Sameer Bhat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem
Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Email Explorer feature has proven invaluable, offering a broader perspective than automated alerts and incidents alone."
"Scanning, vulnerability reporting, and the dashboard are the most valuable features."
"Setting up Microsoft 365 Defender is easy. It's a user-friendly solution that provides threat protection. It has good stability and scalability."
"Microsoft Defender XDR has significantly improved our operational security."
"Microsoft 365 Defender's most valuable feature is the ability to control the shadow IP."
"I like that it's fully integrated with Windows, Microsoft 365 Exchange Online, and Outlook. It is better than other antivirus solutions because it's fully integrated with all Microsoft products. It's easy to integrate them and onboard all Windows devices from SCCM."
"Microsoft Defender XDR's capability to automatically disrupt advanced cyber attacks is very effective."
"It's a very scalable tool that can be used in a very small environment or in a very large environment. Everything can be managed from a simple dashboard and can be scaled up or down depending on the customer's environment."
More Microsoft Defender XDR pros
"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."
 

Cons

"Improving scalability, especially for very large tenants, could be beneficial for Microsoft Defender XDR."
"The interface could be improved. For example, if you want to do a phishing simulation for your employees, it can take a while to figure out what to do. The interface is a bit messy and could be updated. It isn't too bad, but doing some things can be a long process."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"Microsoft Defender XDR could be improved with a lower price."
"The solution could improve by having better machine learning and AI. Additionally, the interface, documentation, and integration could be better."
"The management and automation of the cloud apps have room for improvement."
"The data recovery and backup could be improved."
"The support could be more knowledgable to improve their offering."
More Microsoft Defender XDR cons
"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license cost for a year is approximately forty-four thousand, and this annual saving is a significant factor in our decision to switch."
"They have moved from a licensing model to pay-per-use... The question is: What happens if, for any reason, there's not enough budget to accept this model? That could be a great problem."
"For Defender, they have Endpoint Plan 1 and Endpoint Plan 2, but I don't know on what basis they have classified Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2, but it has given me enough pain to pick and design Endpoint Plan 1 or Endpoint Plan 2 for my organization. In fact, we are still struggling with it. Too many SKUs are confusing. There should not be too many SKUs, and they shouldn't charge for every new feature."
"The product is fairly priced for what we get from it."
"While the standalone price of Defender XDR might seem high, its value becomes clear when considering the ease of implementation and smooth integration with our existing Microsoft infrastructure, especially when bundled with other Microsoft products."
"It is fairly priced because we get complete integrated services with the E5 license."
"Sometimes 365 Defender is expensive, but it can be moderate, depending on the organization's size and the license type. We're satisfied with the cost because it gives us a product that protects our entire environment with DLP. To compromise some cost, of course, we are to complete the most secure environment."
"Microsoft Defender XDR's licensing is complicated."
More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice
"The product cost is in the mid to high range."
"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business44
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise37
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft 365 Defender?
Microsoft Defender XDR provides strong identity protection with comprehensive insights into risky user behavior and potential indicators of compromise.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?
The pricing for Microsoft Sentinel operates on a pay-as-you-go model based on data ingestion. I recall that Defender XDR pricing is based on the number of endpoints.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?
For Microsoft Defender XDR ( /categories/extended-detection-and-response-xdr ), there is currently no ability to reset passwords for on-premises accounts, which is a key challenge. Incident managem...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
Multifactor authentication is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The product cost is in the mid to high range. You need to have a good budget to implement it, so it is considered fairly expensive for our market. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The solution's pricing and support services need improvement.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR
Compared 11% of the time
Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR Logo
Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR
Compared 9% of the time
Trend Vision One vs Microsoft Defender XDR Logo
Trend Vision One vs Microsoft Defender XDR
Compared 4% of the time
Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Microsoft Defender XDR Logo
Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Microsoft Defender XDR
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 27% of the time
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 16% of the time
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender XDR
August 2025
Microsoft Defender XDR reportDownload Microsoft Defender XDR product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
August 2025
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender
CloudKnox Permissions Management
 

Overview

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment. 

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks. 

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
  • Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
  • Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.
What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
  • Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
  • Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] report.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.

We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.