Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Microsoft and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #29. Microsoft holds a 2.8% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Defender Threat I...
Read 32 Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence reviews
  • 1,419 Views
  • 880 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,282 Views
  • 1,051 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provide advanced threat intelligence solutions. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence appears to have the upper hand in features, making it a stronger investment despite Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus's appealing pricing and support.

What features are offered by Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus offers advanced malware analysis, contextual threat intelligence, and robust integration capabilities. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides comprehensive threat visibility, automated threat detection, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365.

What areas of improvement can be found in Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus could benefit from enhanced reporting, improved data correlation, and more refined threat analysis capabilities. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence users suggest better multi-cloud support, more detailed alerts, and enhanced user interface customization.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence also features quick deployment but has mixed reviews regarding customer service responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus in comparison to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is appreciated for lower setup costs and favorable return on investment. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, despite higher initial costs, offers extensive features and significant long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Threat I...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (10th), Microsoft Security Suite (15th)
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
29th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

TapabrataSamanta - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective solution for monitoring and security but lacks supports for non-Microsoft products
There are weaknesses, and Microsoft is working on addressing them. Over the past three to four years, the ATP and other components have improved significantly, and the integration has also advanced. We are using third-party services. While we have Microsoft Threat Intelligence, which leverages Microsoft's facilities, we also utilize additional third-party threat intelligence. As of today, we don't completely rely on Microsoft for certain regions. This is an area where Microsoft needs to improve. Consequently, we use Anomali, a third-party threat intelligence provider. We integrate our product's intelligence with Anomali, from which we obtain threat insights. Microsoft products offer significant advantages, especially in the realm of threat intelligence. It works very well with Microsoft products. However, you might need additional services if you have non-Microsoft products in your environment. For instance, if you use Apple or Linux, Microsoft's solutions alone might not be sufficient. If they can work more effectively, especially with zero-day attack speed and other sophisticated threats, it will help us provide our customers with timely newsletters about new attacks.
Read full review
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It helps to monitor by providing the best 24/7 monitoring integrated with Sentinel and IBM systems."
"The product is useful when the end user downloads malware files."
"The solution is well integrated with other Microsoft security products."
"The solution blocks incoming threats on the local PC or any cloud-based threats."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence helps to make sure that our systems are intact and not vulnerable."
"The global review and remediation of malicious code is probably the most valuable feature."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"The tool can proactively detect potential incidents."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence pros
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus has had a positive impact on my company as we can reduce the cost for the SOC investment, and we can also get good feedback on how to strengthen our network from the expertise people available."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
 

Cons

"It's a bit complicated to manage because you have many dependencies of servers, many dependencies in queue, and so on. Entries or different endpoints, and you make different configuration topics for each one. So that's a major problem."
"Non-Microsoft products may not integrate as smoothly."
"I would like to see more frequent updates, which is always better for security because of daily threats."
"A stable licensing model is absent"
"One area that can be improved is reducing false positives."
"I would like to see more AI features and capabilities."
"There could be AI functionality included for features like reporting and dashboard preparation."
"The product's dashboard and incident reports functionality needs enhancement."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence cons
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is good."
"The product’s pricing is worth it."
"The solution is relatively expensive; however, our status as a gold partner provides us with several complimentary licenses, which offsets the cost."
"I rate the product's price a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
"The product is a part of my Microsoft 365 subscription, so there is no additional cost. It is cost-effective."
"It is an expensive product."
"Microsoft's pricing structure involves annual fees."
"The solution can be licensed, but most users would already have it in their Office 365 license."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence pricing and cost advice
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"It is expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Performing Arts
12%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
From the telemetry data standpoint, I would prefer Defender data to be more open in future updates.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
We have tried Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence. I have expertise with Microsoft Defender products. I am not familiar with Microsoft Defender for IoT because we did not use that in our environ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I feel that Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus can improve, especially since most of the OEMs are implementing MDR, Managed Service feature, which is still not available with Palo Alto. The MDR feature i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus for threat monitoring, and it is provided by the OEM itself. I use the threat data correlation feature, which correlates with Cortex. We can use it for data corre...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
As a partner with Palo Alto Networks, my email is Sarvajit at bsrgroup.in. My job title is Technical Manager. I confirm that we will publish these reviews on peerspot.com in written or audio format...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Compared 22% of the time
VirusTotal vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
VirusTotal vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Compared 17% of the time
Cisco Threat Grid vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Cisco Threat Grid vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Compared 11% of the time
Anomali vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Logo
Anomali vs Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Compared 10% of the time
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Competitors
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 29% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
August 2025
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence reportDownload Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is a comprehensive security solution that provides organizations with real-time insights into the latest cyber threats. Leveraging advanced machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities, it offers proactive threat detection and response, enabling businesses to stay one step ahead of attackers. With Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, organizations gain access to a vast array of threat intelligence data, including indicators of compromise (IOCs), security incidents, and emerging threats. This data is collected from a wide range of sources, such as Microsoft's global sensor network, industry partners, and security researchers, ensuring comprehensive coverage and accuracy. The solution's advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms analyze this threat intelligence data in real-time, identifying patterns, trends, and anomalies that may indicate a potential security breach. By continuously monitoring the network and endpoints, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence can quickly detect and respond to threats, minimizing the impact of attacks and reducing the time to remediation. 

Microsoft

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.