We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"Microsoft collects trillions of signals from all over the world, which is incredibly valuable. It helps us identify zero-day vulnerabilities and global threats."
"I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten."
"It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"The solution is well integrated with other Microsoft security products."
"They have a very transparent roadmap for the product."
"The tool can proactively detect potential incidents."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"Support must be improved."
"It's a bit complicated to manage because you have many dependencies of servers, many dependencies in queue, and so on. Entries or different endpoints, and you make different configuration topics for each one. So that's a major problem."
"The software is expensive."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is evolving and needs to fix and enhance numerous issues like stability and licensing. The continuous rebranding and licensing changes are confusing."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"The price point is something they can improve slightly for those who don't have an M 365 E5."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence should integrate with different platforms."
"I would like to see more AI features and capabilities."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 23 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), VirusTotal and Splunk Mission Control.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.