Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 3.9% mindshare in ND, compared to Oracle’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Read 96 Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews

604 Views
171 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle NoSQL

Read 8 Oracle NoSQL reviews

596 Views
406 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Oracle NoSQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Oracle NoSQL and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are competing products in the cloud database market. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value over Oracle NoSQL, which is favored for its cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Oracle NoSQL offers schema flexibility, rapid read-write operations, and suitability for variable workloads. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides global data distribution, multi-model capabilities, five consistency levels, and automatic indexing, making it versatile for various applications.

Room for Improvement: Oracle NoSQL could enhance its global distribution capabilities, multi-model support, and consistency level options. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB might improve by reducing complexity for initial setup, optimizing cost predictability, and enhancing user-friendly documentation for complex use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle NoSQL deployment is straightforward with comprehensive documentation and community support, facilitating swift issue resolution. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering sophisticated tools for efficient application scaling. Both receive praise for robust support systems.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle NoSQL delivers competitive pricing and low setup costs, aiding a quicker return on investment for cost-sensitive businesses. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, while perceived as higher-priced, justifies its expense with an extensive feature set facilitating substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st), Vector Databases (1st)

Oracle NoSQL

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 3.9%. The mindshare of Oracle NoSQL is 2.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

MichaelJohn

Director | Data & AI at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Very efficient for application-facing scenarios

There are several areas for improvement. Firstly, having a local development emulator or simulator for Azure Cosmos DB would be beneficial. It would be very handy to have a Docker container that developers can use locally. Although, I know there is a free tier and so on and so forth, having a local environment would be nice. For example, SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB. The second improvement area is the IDE of choice. That means how you interact with Azure Cosmos DB. For example, with SQL Server, you have SQL Server Management Studio. I know there is a little bit of support for Azure Cosmos DB in Azure Data Studio, but it is not heavily advertised or it does not feel like first-class citizen support. Developer experience or developer tooling is missing in terms of interacting with the database. Better developer tools or an IDE for interacting with Azure Cosmos DB would enhance the developer experience. Lastly, there is some mixed messaging about what Azure Cosmos DB is, given its multiple APIs. There are so many Azure Cosmos DB APIs available. There is NoSQL. There are MongoDB, Gremlin, and others. There is still some mixed messaging for others who are new to Azure Cosmos DB about what Azure Cosmos DB is. Is this like MongoDB, but then there is also MongoDB in Azure Cosmos DB? I know it well, and I know that the default one is just NoSQL, but others I have interacted with over the last ten years or so get confused.

Read full review

GLEDSONCOOPER

Infrastructure specialist at Cooper Cloud

The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes

NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For modern applications, I would recommend Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB simplifies the process of saving and retrieving data."

"Azure Cosmos DB helped improve the quality of our search results."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has reduced our total cost of ownership by about half, allowing us to sell our product for about half of what we were selling it before, and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is probably 70% of the reason why that's true."

"The features most valuable to us in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are the auto scale and change feed. These features allow us to do some operations that are not possible with SQL Server."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB were the general infrastructure, ease to use, and interface."

"rate Azure support nine out of 10. They respond quickly and will help you manage costs. However, they mainly give you an overview of the issue, so they'll never have an in-depth idea of what you're doing. They aren't the owners of our product, so they don't know much about it, but they can ask you generally: What are you doing? Are you doing too many updates? How can we reduce the cost?"

"Cosmos is a PaaS, so you don't need to worry about infrastructure and hosting. It has various APIs that allow it to integrate with other solutions. For example, we are using a MongoDB-compatible API for customers, which makes it easier for developers on the team who previously used MongoDB or are accustomed to the old document storage paradigm."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pros

"We have a support agreement with Oracle, ensuring full support for the product. It is crucial for our public-facing features. Oracle NoSQL is easy to manage and has fast data retrieval. Its compatibility with Oracle Database is seamless, making integration between NoSQL and relational databases smooth and effortless. Oracle NoSQL and NoSQL data replication in our environment works efficiently. Oracle fully supports it, and we can easily configure and manage authentication for the NoSQL database."

"The tool is easy to learn."

"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."

"Oracle NoSQL is pretty scalable."

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

Cons

"We should have more freedom to tweak it and make our own queries for non-traditional use-cases."

"The integration with other solutions needs to improve because Cosmos DB's interoperability is lacking in some scenarios. For example, I'm currently implementing Fabric. That involves migrating from environments without apps, processing data and users, and taking them to Fabric."

"Azure Cosmos DB for NoSQL has a less developed interface and fewer SQL commands than MongoDB, and its community support is also smaller."

"Areas of improvement for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB include indexing. While it makes data retrieval easier, it also increases costs."

"Overall, it works very well and fits the purpose regardless of the target application. However, by default, there is a threshold to accommodate bulk or large requests."

"A better description and more guidance would help because the first time I created it, I didn't understand that a container is similar to a table in SQL."

"The main area of improvement is the cost, as the expense is high. Also, when writing processes into Cosmos, sometimes the threshold is met, which can be a problem if developers have not written the code properly, limiting calls to five thousand."

"Slight enhancements in integration interfaces, expanded dashboard functionalities, and broader use-case support would be beneficial."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB cons

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

"I would rate Oracle NoSQL six or 6.5 out of ten based on my experience."

"Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience."

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

"The installation is difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are not consuming so much yet since we are at the beginning of using this solution. I would rate the pricing of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB a six out of ten."

"Pricing, at times, is not super clear because they use the request unit (RU) model. To manage not just Azure Cosmos DB but what you are receiving for the dollars paid is not easy. It is very abstract. They could do a better job of connecting Azure Cosmos DB with the value or some variation of that."

"The tool is not expensive."

"It is expensive. The moment you have high availability options and they are mixed with the type of multitenant architecture you use, the pricing is on the higher end."

"Cosmos DB is cost-effective when starting but requires careful management."

"Because of the lack of understanding about RUs, the costs become unpredictable. It sometimes goes over the budget."

"The pricing for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is good. Initially, it seemed like an expensive way to manage a NoSQL data store, but so many improvements that have been made to the platform have made it cost-effective."

"Its pricing is higher compared to solutions like Aerospike. However, it is justified because of the out-of-the-box features that are provided. The availability and resiliency that we have make it worth the price."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

We are not consuming so much yet since we are at the beginning of using this solution. I would rate the pricing of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

We are at the beginning of production, and everything is working very well. The price can always be lower, but currently, it's not a problem.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?

The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?

We use the enterprise edition of Oracle NoSQL.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?

Sometimes we face problems with the connection between our applications and the database. It may be due to network issues or performance issues on Oracle's side. Our DBA team requests validations f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Chroma vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 13% of the time

Pinecone vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 7% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Neptune vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

MongoDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 47% of the time

Cassandra vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 29% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 11% of the time

More Oracle NoSQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

June 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

June 2025

Download Oracle NoSQL product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.

Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Scalability and Autoscaling: Efficiently handles growing data and user demands.
Multi-Model Support: Adapts to different data models seamlessly.
Global Distribution: Provides low-latency access across multiple regions.
Automatic Failover: Ensures high availability and reliability.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Offers seamless connectivity with Azure services.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews?

Performance and Speed: Exceptionally fast processing for real-time data analytics.
Cost Optimization: Tools for managing expenses effectively.
Secure Data Handling: Implements strong data security measures.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports diverse data ingestion methods.

Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.

Microsoft

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify

Airbus, Globacom, WebAction

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.