Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 5.1% mindshare in ND, compared to Oracle’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Read 102 Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews

6,178 Views
988 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle NoSQL

Read 8 Oracle NoSQL reviews

559 Views
537 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Oracle NoSQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Oracle NoSQL and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are leading cloud-based database solutions. Oracle NoSQL is recognized for its affordability and seamless integration with Oracle ecosystems. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, however, holds an advantage due to its global distribution, multi-model support, and high availability.

Features: Oracle NoSQL provides scalable NoSQL database solutions with automatic scaling, strong data model flexibility, and compatibility with Oracle Cloud, focusing on low-latency transactions and reliable data storage. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution across multiple regions and supports various data models, such as document, graph, and key-value, with easy integration into Microsoft’s ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Oracle NoSQL could benefit from expanding its global reach and enhancing its support for diverse data models beyond the Oracle ecosystem. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could improve its cost-effectiveness and offer more straightforward pricing structures, as it could be less accessible for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle NoSQL includes an intuitive deployment process with extensive documentation, making integration smooth within the Oracle ecosystem. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides robust deployment options along with broad global service coverage and strong Microsoft support, known for its excellent multi-platform support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle NoSQL is generally more budget-friendly, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions within Oracle’s ecosystem. Azure Cosmos DB, while higher in cost, may offer a greater ROI by providing extensive features suited for global scalability and robust data support.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st), Vector Databases (1st)

Oracle NoSQL

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 5.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle NoSQL is 2.8%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

MichaelJohn

Director | Data & AI at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Very efficient for application-facing scenarios

There are several areas for improvement. Firstly, having a local development emulator or simulator for Azure Cosmos DB would be beneficial. It would be very handy to have a Docker container that developers can use locally. Although, I know there is a free tier and so on and so forth, having a local environment would be nice. For example, SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB. The second improvement area is the IDE of choice. That means how you interact with Azure Cosmos DB. For example, with SQL Server, you have SQL Server Management Studio. I know there is a little bit of support for Azure Cosmos DB in Azure Data Studio, but it is not heavily advertised or it does not feel like first-class citizen support. Developer experience or developer tooling is missing in terms of interacting with the database. Better developer tools or an IDE for interacting with Azure Cosmos DB would enhance the developer experience. Lastly, there is some mixed messaging about what Azure Cosmos DB is, given its multiple APIs. There are so many Azure Cosmos DB APIs available. There is NoSQL. There are MongoDB, Gremlin, and others. There is still some mixed messaging for others who are new to Azure Cosmos DB about what Azure Cosmos DB is. Is this like MongoDB, but then there is also MongoDB in Azure Cosmos DB? I know it well, and I know that the default one is just NoSQL, but others I have interacted with over the last ten years or so get confused.

Read full review

GLEDSONCOOPER

Infrastructure specialist at Cooper Cloud

The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes

NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Change feed is a pretty amazing feature. Once you make the changes, they are quickly read for you, and then you also have geo-replication. You can do a lot of things in your region, and the same regions can be replicated all over the world."

"The best feature of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is API access, which makes it very easy to interact with the database without needing to write queries."

"The user interface of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is the best part of the entire Microsoft ecosystem; I find it to be the best user interface you can ever hope for, especially when compared to AWS and GCP, which do not measure up as well."

"Azure Cosmos DB helped improve the quality of our search results."

"The efficiency of search capabilities is significant, particularly when it comes to the flexibility of conducting in-depth, almost recursive searches that are both efficient and cost-effective."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers the response times needed for advanced analytics applications."

"Switching to the cloud significantly improved scalability, flexibility, and uptime."

"Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's most valuable feature is latency."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pros

"Oracle NoSQL is pretty scalable."

"The tool is easy to learn."

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

"We have a support agreement with Oracle, ensuring full support for the product. It is crucial for our public-facing features. Oracle NoSQL is easy to manage and has fast data retrieval. Its compatibility with Oracle Database is seamless, making integration between NoSQL and relational databases smooth and effortless. Oracle NoSQL and NoSQL data replication in our environment works efficiently. Oracle fully supports it, and we can easily configure and manage authentication for the NoSQL database."

"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."

Cons

"It would be beneficial if Cosmos supported batch and real-time use cases to make the system more seamless."

"Azure Cosmos DB for NoSQL has a less developed interface and fewer SQL commands than MongoDB, and its community support is also smaller."

"Slight enhancements in integration interfaces, expanded dashboard functionalities, and broader use-case support would be beneficial."

"There were instances where the DB was not responding, and we lost some part of our business due to that."

"The query is a little complex. SQL server should have more options. But the query should be better."

"The topic of RU consumption needs better documentation. Now that Microsoft has partnered with different LLM organizations, such as OpenAI, a bot could guide us through different metrics present in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB."

"What is missing in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is definitely cold storage. We know it's coming, but that's currently what is missing—the possibility to park older data in a cold tier."

"In that scenario, two things can be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB cons

"The installation is difficult."

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

"I would rate Oracle NoSQL six or 6.5 out of ten based on my experience."

"Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a bit complex."

"You need to understand exactly the details of how the pricing works technically to stay within reasonable pricing."

"Its price is very good for the basic stuff. When you go to a more complicated use case, especially when you need replication and availability zones, it gets a little costly."

"Microsoft provides fair pricing."

"The pricing for Cosmos DB has improved, particularly with the new pricing for Autoscale."

"The cost is the biggest limitation of this solution."

"The pricing and licensing model was initially difficult to understand, but as soon as I learned what was going on and how it was priced, it was pretty easy."

"The pricing is perceived as being on the higher side. However, if you have large data operations, it might reduce costs due to performance efficiencies."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

11%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The pricing for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is good, but there is a developer factor to consider. It could be economical or expensive depending on usage. Guidance about query consumption of Request U...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The only area Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB can improve on is its documentation; while it is solid and very useful, enhancements in the indexing documentation would help users save costs and make it mo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?

The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?

We use the enterprise edition of Oracle NoSQL.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?

Sometimes we face problems with the connection between our applications and the database. It may be due to network issues or performance issues on Oracle's side. Our DBA team requests validations f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Chroma vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 11% of the time

Pinecone vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 10% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 37% of the time

Cassandra vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 24% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 11% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 11% of the time

Apache HBase vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle NoSQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

August 2025

Download Oracle NoSQL product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.

Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Scalability and Autoscaling: Efficiently handles growing data and user demands.
Multi-Model Support: Adapts to different data models seamlessly.
Global Distribution: Provides low-latency access across multiple regions.
Automatic Failover: Ensures high availability and reliability.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Offers seamless connectivity with Azure services.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews?

Performance and Speed: Exceptionally fast processing for real-time data analytics.
Cost Optimization: Tools for managing expenses effectively.
Secure Data Handling: Implements strong data security measures.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports diverse data ingestion methods.

Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.

Microsoft

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify

Airbus, Globacom, WebAction

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.