Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 3.3% mindshare in ND, compared to Oracle’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Read 89 Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews

448 Views
160 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle NoSQL

Read 8 Oracle NoSQL reviews

636 Views
522 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Oracle NoSQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Oracle NoSQL and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are competing products in the cloud database market. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value over Oracle NoSQL, which is favored for its cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Oracle NoSQL offers schema flexibility, rapid read-write operations, and suitability for variable workloads. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides global data distribution, multi-model capabilities, five consistency levels, and automatic indexing, making it versatile for various applications.

Room for Improvement: Oracle NoSQL could enhance its global distribution capabilities, multi-model support, and consistency level options. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB might improve by reducing complexity for initial setup, optimizing cost predictability, and enhancing user-friendly documentation for complex use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle NoSQL deployment is straightforward with comprehensive documentation and community support, facilitating swift issue resolution. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering sophisticated tools for efficient application scaling. Both receive praise for robust support systems.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle NoSQL delivers competitive pricing and low setup costs, aiding a quicker return on investment for cost-sensitive businesses. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, while perceived as higher-priced, justifies its expense with an extensive feature set facilitating substantial long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (6th), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st), Vector Databases (3rd)

Oracle NoSQL

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 3.3%. The mindshare of Oracle NoSQL is 2.7%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

MichaelJohn

Director | Data & AI at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Very efficient for application-facing scenarios

There are several areas for improvement. Firstly, having a local development emulator or simulator for Azure Cosmos DB would be beneficial. It would be very handy to have a Docker container that developers can use locally. Although, I know there is a free tier and so on and so forth, having a local environment would be nice. For example, SQL Server is very portable. You can even install it on your machine. That is the number one thing that is missing in Azure Cosmos DB. The second improvement area is the IDE of choice. That means how you interact with Azure Cosmos DB. For example, with SQL Server, you have SQL Server Management Studio. I know there is a little bit of support for Azure Cosmos DB in Azure Data Studio, but it is not heavily advertised or it does not feel like first-class citizen support. Developer experience or developer tooling is missing in terms of interacting with the database. Better developer tools or an IDE for interacting with Azure Cosmos DB would enhance the developer experience. Lastly, there is some mixed messaging about what Azure Cosmos DB is, given its multiple APIs. There are so many Azure Cosmos DB APIs available. There is NoSQL. There are MongoDB, Gremlin, and others. There is still some mixed messaging for others who are new to Azure Cosmos DB about what Azure Cosmos DB is. Is this like MongoDB, but then there is also MongoDB in Azure Cosmos DB? I know it well, and I know that the default one is just NoSQL, but others I have interacted with over the last ten years or so get confused.

Read full review

GLEDSONCOOPER

Infrastructure specialist at Cooper Cloud

The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes

NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is highly scalable."

"It is easy to use because you don't need to know much about Cosmos DB or have prior experience."

"The speed is impressive, and integrating our power-up database with Kafka was an improvement."

"It has been very efficient so far. The team has been using it for quite a while. I am new to the team, but they always talk about how efficient it is."

"It is integral to our business because it helps manage schema and metadata for all our documents and customers. The AI insights we glean based on Azure OpenAI also end up in Cosmos DB. We need a NoSQL store because the schema is dynamic and flexible, so Cosmos DB is a great fit. It has four nines or possibly five nines availability, excellent geo-distribution, and auto-scaling."

"The querying language and the SDKs they've provided over the years have been phenomenal, giving us a significant advantage."

"The solution is used because we get faster response times with large data sets than with SQL. It's essential for us because we have half a billion rows, and we need to return them quickly."

"Overall, I would rate Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB a nine out of ten."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pros

"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."

"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."

"Oracle NoSQL is pretty scalable."

"We have a support agreement with Oracle, ensuring full support for the product. It is crucial for our public-facing features. Oracle NoSQL is easy to manage and has fast data retrieval. Its compatibility with Oracle Database is seamless, making integration between NoSQL and relational databases smooth and effortless. Oracle NoSQL and NoSQL data replication in our environment works efficiently. Oracle fully supports it, and we can easily configure and manage authentication for the NoSQL database."

"The tool is easy to learn."

Cons

"The integration with other solutions needs to improve because Cosmos DB's interoperability is lacking in some scenarios. For example, I'm currently implementing Fabric. That involves migrating from environments without apps, processing data and users, and taking them to Fabric."

"There is room for improvement in their customer support services."

"A minor improvement would be enabling batch operations through the UI. Currently, to delete all documents in a collection, we must use an API, which some of my team finds inconvenient for admin tasks."

"Better documentation on how to integrate with other components would be helpful because I was struggling with this."

"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."

"There are no particular factors that need improvement. There is a little bit of a learning curve with scaling workloads, but it works smoothly."

"We had some performance issues with a data segregation query. We worked closely with Microsoft to solve the problem of performance where, for example, one query had a delay of almost two or three minutes for this one use case. Microsoft tried to improve the product, but in the end, the solution was to change to MongoDB. MongoDB had better performance."

"We'd like to avoid full DR replication if possible, as this would result in significant cost savings."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB cons

"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

"I would rate Oracle NoSQL six or 6.5 out of ten based on my experience."

"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."

"The installation is difficult."

"Focusing on making the administration easier compared to other solutions like MongoDB could be beneficial. Simplifying the administrative tasks could enhance the user experience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cosmos DB gave us three accounts for $400. We pay according to the usage."

"Cost isn’t a big hurdle for us right now. The solution is not costly."

"It is cost-efficient as long as you understand the right setup to optimize usage. Knowing the data needs of the organization and adjusting the Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB usage accordingly helps save costs, but if you don't know, you could end up spending more than necessary."

"Its cost is transparent. Pricing depends on the transaction and data size, but overall, it is cheaper compared to hosting it on your corporate network due to other factors like power consumption."

"Cosmos DB is cost-effective when starting but requires careful management."

"The tool is not expensive."

"The solution is very expensive."

"Cosmos DB is expensive, and the RU-based pricing model is confusing. Although they have a serverless layer, there are deficiencies in what I can define and assign to a database. Estimating infrastructure needs is not straightforward, making it challenging to manage costs."

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

The initial setup is simple and straightforward. You can set up a Cosmos DB in a day, even configuring things like availability zones around the world.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Its cost is transparent. Pricing depends on the transaction and data size, but overall, it is cheaper compared to hosting it on your corporate network due to other factors like power consumption. C...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

I had a challenging experience implementing the emulator with a Mac. I had to install the emulator in a Docker container because it is not natively compatible. A significant amount of time was spen...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?

The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?

We use the enterprise edition of Oracle NoSQL.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?

Sometimes we face problems with the connection between our applications and the database. It may be due to network issues or performance issues on Oracle's side. Our DBA team requests validations f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Chroma vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 15% of the time

Pinecone vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Neptune vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 6% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Competitors

MongoDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 54% of the time

Cassandra vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 30% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Oracle NoSQL

Compared 16% of the time

More Oracle NoSQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB

April 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

March 2025

Download Oracle NoSQL product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.

Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.

What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?

Scalability and Autoscaling: Efficiently handles growing data and user demands.
Multi-Model Support: Adapts to different data models seamlessly.
Global Distribution: Provides low-latency access across multiple regions.
Automatic Failover: Ensures high availability and reliability.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Offers seamless connectivity with Azure services.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB reviews?

Performance and Speed: Exceptionally fast processing for real-time data analytics.
Cost Optimization: Tools for managing expenses effectively.
Secure Data Handling: Implements strong data security measures.
Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports diverse data ingestion methods.

Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.

Microsoft

The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify

Airbus, Globacom, WebAction

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. Oracle NoSQL report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.