Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Microsoft Azure Block Storage are two prominent storage solutions offered by Microsoft in the cloud storage category. Microsoft Azure Block Storage seems to have the upper hand due to its robust performance and reliability.
Features: Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers excellent scalability, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Microsoft Azure Block Storage provides high performance, efficient data access speed, and enhanced performance features.
Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Object Storage suggest improvements in latency, security features, and documentation. Microsoft Azure Block Storage feedback indicates a need for better documentation, more flexible pricing plans, and enhanced latency performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users report a straightforward deployment process and satisfactory customer service. Microsoft Azure Block Storage users share similar sentiments about deployment but find customer service more responsive.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is commended for being cost-effective with a good ROI. Microsoft Azure Block Storage, although more expensive, is seen as providing excellent value due to its robust performance and superior ROI.
Support quality is good, but the main issue is the delay in handling tickets.
The response time for enterprise support needs improvement.
If I want to change something on my resources or directly access it via the portal, there is not a service level agreement of 100%, and sometimes it's quite difficult to access.
Technical support from Microsoft is good.
The ability to scale is well-supported.
It is a significant advantage of the product.
We are on a premium plan, which should handle scalability automatically.
The storage is very scalable, so you can effortlessly scale it.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
Most of the time, it fits the requirement, but for drastic demands, we may need to provide quotas and other requirements to Microsoft for them to manage forecast and capacity planning.
It isn't as stable as sound storage systems in a premise environment.
Overall, the stability is very good.
None of the other storage vendors have all these features so easily manageable and fast to set up as Block Storage.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
From a security standpoint, there is a question mark due to past cyber attacks.
Its compatibility with various platforms could be enhanced to allow for a seamless operation across different cloud environments.
Some alternatives are cheaper and available for long trial periods before the payment.
Enabling SFTP on Microsoft Azure Block Storage didn’t allow us to get the IP address, as Azure doesn’t support it.
When using Data Lakes for analytics and frequently pulling data from our source database to Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, there should be faster methods to download large data from Microsoft Azure Storage Blob to different locations.
They need enhancement in security aspects. Security alerts and integrations could be improved as part of lifecycle management, especially for archives and restoration requirements.
The improvement needed for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is to reduce the transactional charges, as these read and write operation charges are higher.
For medium-sized companies, especially when discussing cost and scalability, it can be quite expensive.
The cost for Azure Data Factory, utilized for intensive data migration, was high but expected, as it's a one-time activity.
It is reasonable, however, it can be cheaper.
It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers.
Regarding pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage, I find it reasonable.
The tool allows me to download to my device, control access, and manage data with ease.
The ability to increase and scale out is really easy, allowing us to manage a large amount of data with reduced dependency on scalability issues.
I can store data, use the storage account as a queue, and the pricing is also quite economical.
Since I work mostly with AI/ML, data piping, data integrations, and ETL tools, these features are valuable.
When talking about storage accounts, customers utilize Azure file as a replica of the file server, allowing them to access file shares or storage accounts from their systems, making it easy to use while automatically syncing data with the cloud.
The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Object Storage | 2.4% |
| Microsoft Azure Block Storage | 1.0% |
| Other | 96.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications
Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.
REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
