We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation vs. vCloud Director

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation vs vCloud Director comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
Turbonomic
Read 17 Turbonomic reviews.
7,761 views|4,225 comparisons
Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation Logo
Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation
893 views|776 comparisons
vCloud Director Logo
vCloud Director
Read 8 vCloud Director reviews.
6,612 views|5,067 comparisons
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Recommendations regarding volumes and family types tell us how much we will be saving by implementing them
The volumes feature lets us know which volumes or disks are not attached or that are not being used anymore and that we can go ahead and delete... Read more →
Use Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation? Share your opinion.
Ajit Yadav
Great extensibility feature, which enables integration of other services
As a service provider, it is key for us to have control over the overall cost of ownership, as well as providing benefits, good service and making... Read more →
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, an IBM company, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."
  • "I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive."
  • "We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective."
  • "When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for."
  • "I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault."
  • "It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive."
  • "The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

    • More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "It runs our company in the millions of rand every month."
  • "This is an expensive solution."
  • "It's a costly product. The licenses may not be costly, but with every new development in their product, we need to purchase deployment services, and the deployment services are quite costly."
  • "The license could be less expensive and we are on a perpetual license."
  • "In certain cases, the price of Cloud Director is quite high, especially with the load balancing and other features they've introduced. That seems quite costly. Overall, for VSPP programming, I think it's okay. However, features like enterprise load balancing and all these other things are very costly."

    • More vCloud Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    Licensing costs are middle of the road; you need to take into account what the solution delivers to the customer. If… more »
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    It's tough to say how they could improve. They've done a lot better with their Kubernetes integration. If you'd asked me… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    We have a hybrid cloud setup that includes some on-prem resources, and then we have AWS as our primary cloud provider… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about vCloud Director?
    Top Answer: 
    This is the go-to tool for anyone looking for standard out-of-the-box capabilities in a fully multitenant public cloud… more »
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCloud Director?
    Top Answer: 
    In certain cases, the price of Cloud Director is quite high, especially with the load balancing and other features… more »
    Read all 14 answers   →
    What needs improvement with vCloud Director?
    Top Answer: 
    Cloud Director has room for improvement in many areas. One critical thing that comes to mind is the hyperscalers. They… more »
    Read all 18 answers   →
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VMTurbo Operations Manager
    Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
    Learn More
    Turbonomic, an IBM company
    Micro Focus
    VMware
    Overview

    Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

    For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

    www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation (CSA) provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

    VMware vCloud Director provides software-defined services for data centers in the form of virtual data centers. Computing, networking, security, and storage are all virtualized when you deploy this solution. The result is that users will get to enjoy infrastructure that is operationally ready in a matter of minutes without needing to install and configure any physical infrastructure.

    Offer
    Learn more about Turbonomic
    Learn More
    Learn more about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation
    Learn More
    Learn more about vCloud Director
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
    China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
    MicroStrategy, National Democratic Institute, and NYSE Euronext.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Cloud Provider6%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider28%
    Government5%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise51%
    Large Enterprise35%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, an IBM company, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is ranked 29th in Cloud Management while vCloud Director is ranked 5th in Cloud Management with 8 reviews. Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is rated 0.0, while vCloud Director is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCloud Director writes "Great extensibility feature, which enables integration of other services ". Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Control-M, AWS Control Tower and Operations Orchestration, whereas vCloud Director is most compared with VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), VMware vRealize Operations (vROps), Nutanix Calm, vCenter Orchestrator and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.