No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Mendix vs Toca.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mendix
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Agentic Automation (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (11th), AI Software Development (9th)
Toca.io
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
84th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Mendix is 3.9%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toca.io is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Mendix3.9%
Toca.io0.4%
Other95.7%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Mitchel Mol BGS - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Blue Green Solutions
Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns
In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.
Use Toca.io?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?
I do not have much experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales or business team usually handles that, and as a developer, I don't have a clear idea.
What needs improvement with Mendix?
I think Mendix can be improved by supporting automated tests more easily. For example, Mendix can add some IDs for each component to build the automation tests more easily.
What is your primary use case for Mendix?
I use Mendix to build a system about the consultation of APIs. We are using Mendix to build a system to check SAP, which is another system, and we use APIs to bring information from SAP to this pro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. ATT 5. Bank of America 6. Capital One 7. Cisco 8. CocaCola 9. Dell 10. Disney 11. eBay 12. Facebook 13. Google 14. HP 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. LinkedIn 19. Mastercard 20. Microsoft 21. Netflix 22. Nike 23. Oracle 24. PayPal 25. Pinterest 26. Qualcomm 27. SAP 28. Spotify 29. Tesla 30. Toyota 31. Visa 32. Walmart
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Mendix, Oracle and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: March 2026.
886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.