Skyhigh Security vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Skyhigh Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Skyhigh Security is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8, while Broadcom is ranked #29. Skyhigh Security holds a 3.1% mindshare in WSG, compared to Broadcom’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Skyhigh Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Skyhigh Security and Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway compete in the secure web gateways category. Skyhigh Security has an edge in pricing and support, whereas Symantec is recognized for its rich feature set and value for cost.

Features: Skyhigh Security offers integrated CASB capabilities, strong DLP support, and comprehensive security options. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway is known for advanced threat protection, robust encryption features, and a solid feature set for enterprises with complex security needs.

Room for Improvement: Skyhigh Security could enhance scalability options, offer SD-WAN support, and improve documentation. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial setup costs, and streamlining user training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skyhigh Security provides seamless deployment and efficient customer service, making it accessible to diverse organizations. In contrast, Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway involves a complex deployment but offers extensive customer support and training resources, ensuring thorough assistance for its intricate setup.

Pricing and ROI: Skyhigh Security is more cost-effective, offering quicker ROI due to lower setup costs and affordable subscription pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway, despite higher expenses, is a strategic investment delivering substantial long-term value, especially for those with demanding security requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of iboss is 3.2%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Skyhigh Security is 3.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	3.2%
Skyhigh Security	3.1%
Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway	0.9%
Other	92.8%

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

DeepakGupta_

Deputy Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud security has improved DLP incident management and simplifies email protection

One major challenge is that downloading incidents during the investigation process takes a very long time, and this issue should be resolved. More customized columns and filtering options in incident review would be beneficial. File types should be included, such as file names along with file extensions, which are not currently available to my knowledge. Overall, Skyhigh Security is very good and just needs to improve in terms of the latency of downloading incidents.

Read full review

reviewer2296710

Security Specialist at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficiently blocks unwanted web content and malicious websites and very stable solution

Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway can be improved by giving customers more ability to provide feedback on the categorization of websites and the site review portal. Customers should be able to submit more feedback on the reports from malicious web content and malicious websites. The solution could be more effective at identifying and classifying malicious websites.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We chose iboss for both zero trust and proxy (SWG) because their SWG was superior."

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

"I would definitely recommend iboss for web filtering purposes to other organizations or individuals."

"The students were always protected, and the content filtering worked very well, seeming to work better than other products we had tried previously."

"I recommend iboss for organizations looking for strong cloud-based web security and centralized access control."

"The console is cloud-based, which is something I really appreciate."

"This product is solid, fairly easy to use, and reliable."

"Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD."

More iboss pros

"The most valuable features of MVISION Cloud are the automatic reports and modification incidents."

"It is easy to configure rules."

"Overall, we have been very happy with the product."

"The management is very good."

"The most valuable features of McAfee Web Gateway are anti-malware, reports, and powerful categorization of web pages."

"Improves creation of security alerts on web proxy logs by having a separate system interpret said logs."

"Skyhigh Security positively impacted my organization by allowing us to get rid of the VPNs, which reduced the overhead for IT, and it meant we did not need as many licenses for the VPN software for all of the laptops."

"Without Skyhigh, we had zero visibility, but now we are aware of so much more."

More Skyhigh Security pros

"The product is easy to install and deploy on the cloud."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy to set up. It was pretty straightforward."

"This solution does not require much administration."

Cons

"Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device and filtering did not always work correctly."

"Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc. It is easy to gain access if, for example, hackers obtain my username and password."

"Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern."

"I have heard they are doing DDoS filtering, but I am not certain if they are implementing it correctly."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

"Sometimes when you call in support, you get someone who is just following a sheet. It feels like a runaround. You feel that you are running into that support wall."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"I would like to see simpler dashboards, more detailed reporting, and faster performance in iboss."

More iboss cons

"Skyhigh Security can be improved as it lacks debugging capabilities."

"Its capabilities are still rather limited compared to other solutions."

"The feature that we would like to have is a hybrid environment, including both cloud and on-premises."

"Skyhigh Security is complex to manage. While it should ideally be more user-friendly, customers often find themselves having to manage it post-deployment."

"One area for improvement I've seen in Skyhigh Security is that it lacks support for unsanctioned applications, where customers have their applications. Those applications do not come from Microsoft or other popular vendors. For example, Microsoft has support for Teams and it has support for OneDrive, but it doesn't have support for custom applications built by customers. Customers have internal teams building and publishing applications to the external world, but Skyhigh Security doesn't have support for those applications, and this is the main problem I've seen. The solution only supports a pool of applications that are from Microsoft and other major SaaS vendors. McAfee doesn't provide support for custom applications, compared to other vendors who provide it. For example, Bitglass and Netskope both have support for custom applications. Another area for improvement in Skyhigh Security is that its API support is a little weak. I also have not seen a strong integration between the solution and other McAfee products."

"The encrypted disk implementation could be improved."

"Sometimes the console performance is slow and updating custom attributes can be cumbersome as you have to do each attribute for a cloud service individually, then click the popup box to continue."

"The cloud needs improvement with respect to DLP."

More Skyhigh Security cons

"Symantec support is not very good. It is now outsourcing a significant portion of its support desk functions to distributors, who are taking over some of the help desk responsibilities."

"Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway can be improved by giving customers more ability to provide feedback on the categorization of websites and the site review portal."

"The product is cost-effective, considering its features, technology, and support services."

"WSS runs slowly sometimes, I would like for this to be looked into."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"There is an annual licensing cost to use McAfee Web Gateway. The purchasing of licensing can be difficult for the government sector."

"It's an expensive solution."

"Pricing for Skyhigh Security is okay, though there's always a scope for price improvements. Its pricing is okay compared to other products because other products have very expensive licensing costs. Along with the licensing, support is also provided for Skyhigh Security, so pricing is reasonable, but if there's proactive or better support, that will justify the pricing. I haven't interacted with the Skyhigh Security technical support team yet, so I'd give pricing a four out of five rating for now."

"Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost."

"The licensing fees are based on what environments you are monitoring."

"This is an expensive product, but you have to compare that with other solutions that are on the market."

"Have a risk-based approach towards pricing."

"The solution is quite expensive. As we take add-ons continuously as per our customer's requirements, there are additional charges."

More Skyhigh Security pricing and cost advice

"The price is fixed and affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	34
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

iboss could be improved by making the dashboard more user-friendly, providing more detailed real-time alerts, and imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

iboss is primarily used for cloud security, helping to protect users when they access websites and cloud applications...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

The pricing and licensing for iboss were reasonable for the security features. The setup costs were manageable, thoug...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Web Gateway?

From my perspective as a distributor and based on feedback from my clients, Skyhigh Security has a bit of a disadvant...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Web Gateway?

I do not use Skyhigh Security firsthand, but M.Tech Philippines distributes Skyhigh Security as one of the authorized...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Web Gateway?

I always believe that Skyhigh Security works hand-in-hand with Trellix. What we are doing in our approach is to deliv...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 5% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint ONE vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Skyhigh Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Skyhigh Security Competitors

Cisco Umbrella vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Compared 21% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Compared 19% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiProxy vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Compared 5% of the time

More Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

October 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Skyhigh Security

October 2026

Download Skyhigh Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

October 2026

Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway report

Download Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

McAfee MVISION Cloud, McAfee MVISION Unified Cloud Edge, McAfee Web Gateway, McAfee MVISION CNAPP, and Skyhigh Networks, McAfee Web Gateway

Symantec Web Security Service

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

iboss

Skyhigh Security

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

iboss

Skyhigh Security provides comprehensive protection with features like user behavior analytics, shadow IT identification, and data loss prevention. Its integration with IT infrastructure offers robust security insights and helps maintain compliance.

Skyhigh Security offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation while delivering substantial threat protection. It enhances existing IT infrastructure integration, such as DLP and Active Directory, to strengthen security. Yet, there is room for improvement in report generation speed, interface intuitiveness, and integration with other products. Organizations utilize Skyhigh Security to audit internet behavior, secure cloud environments and control web content. It effectively manages data movement and ensures compliance, while preventing unauthorized access and bandwidth misuse.

What are the key features of Skyhigh Security?

Shadow IT Identification: Detects unauthorized IT activity to maintain security.
Cloud Service Risk Assessments: Offers detailed evaluations of cloud services' risks.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or deliberate data breaches.
User Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user actions for potential security threats.
Security Insights: Provides comprehensive reports to understand security posture.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Threat Protection: Offers robust measures against potential security risks.
Compliance: Assists with industry regulations and standards adherence.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances protection by integrating with existing infrastructure.
User Experience: Easy navigation despite needing interface improvements.
Cloud Security: Secures cloud environments effectively.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, companies implement Skyhigh Security for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. It helps secure access to SaaS applications and protects against threats, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and preventing data breaches while optimizing performance in cloud environments.

Skyhigh Security

Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway provides effective web security solutions designed to protect against internet threats while ensuring secure access to web applications.

Designed for companies seeking reliable web security, Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway offers a resilient platform to defend against threats and control web access. It leverages advanced technologies to filter undesirable content and protect sensitive data. It enables secure browsing and delivers robust policy enforcement to keep enterprise networks safe, helping businesses stay compliant and safeguard their data against modern cyber threats.

What are the key features of Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway?

Advanced Threat Protection: Safeguards against sophisticated malware and cyber threats.
Content Filtering: Blocks unwanted web content and enforces safe browsing policies.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects sensitive data from being exposed or stolen.
HTTPS Inspection: Monitors encrypted traffic to prevent threats and ensure compliance.
Access Control: Enables granular control over user and device web access.

What are the benefits when evaluating Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway?

Enhanced Security: Provides comprehensive protection against web-based threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces risks and potential data breach costs with advanced protection.
Compliance Assurance: Helps maintain compliance with industry regulations.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing organizational demands without compromising performance.
User Productivity: Encourages secure access to necessary resources improving productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway is crucial for protecting confidential data and ensuring secure communications. Its ability to implement strict compliance measures makes it a preferred choice for sectors with high regulatory standards. By preventing data breaches and unauthorized access, it supports enterprises in maintaining their business integrity and reputation.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Western Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

November 2026

Free Report: Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Skyhigh Security vs. Symantec Cloud Secure Web Gateway report.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.