Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ManageEngine DataSecurity vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

ManageEngine and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. ManageEngine is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 0.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
ManageEngine DataSecurity
Read 2 ManageEngine DataSecurity reviews
  • 149 Views
  • 74 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews
  • 1,771 Views
  • 484 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and ManageEngine DataSecurity are competing in data protection for organizations. Palo Alto has an edge due to its strong detection capabilities and automation, while ManageEngine offers a budget-friendly approach with effective data control.

Features: Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention offers advanced threat detection, automatic policy adaptation, and comprehensive security features. ManageEngine provides real-time data monitoring, granular access controls, and extensive data protection capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto streamlines the deployment process with supportive structures for accessibility. ManageEngine integrates smoothly with existing systems and places emphasis on responsive customer service to minimize disruptions.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention has a higher setup cost potentially offset by substantial ROI through efficient threat prevention. ManageEngine offers competitive pricing with balanced ROI, appealing to price-conscious businesses seeking effective data security.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine DataSecurity
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
31st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of ManageEngine DataSecurity is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 2.0%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

GM
Affordable and provides visibility into what the users are doing with the data
The file integrity monitoring feature is difficult to manage because some files are confidential while others are not. We use a different tool to classify the files as confidential and non-confidential. The sensitive data discovery and classification features are not of much help. It is a difficult process. The controlling features must be improved. The interface must be improved.
Read full review
OusaidAbaz - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlines firewall management and has reliable security features
The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites. Additionally, the security modules like Data Loss Prevention and antivirus are vital as they integrate into the firewall to protect endpoints. These features are automated via cloud connections to Palo Alto Networks, ensuring up-to-date security signatures.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product’s strict policies are its best features."
"The detection and alert features are valuable."
"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."
"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."
"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."
"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."
"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."
"It is a stable solution with good support."
"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."
 

Cons

"The vendor must provide a cloud solution."
"The interface must be improved."
"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."
"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."
"Pricing is expensive."
"There are mostly performance issues."
"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."
"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."
"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."
"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."
"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."
"It's expensive."
"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."
"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
12%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine DataSecurity?
The detection and alert features are valuable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine DataSecurity?
The file integrity monitoring feature is difficult to manage because some files are confidential while others are not. We use a different tool to classify the files as confidential and non-confiden...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine DataSecurity?
We use the product for real-time data visibility and analysis.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?
Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data suc...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?
The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Compared 31% of the time
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Compared 25% of the time
Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Logo
Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Compared 22% of the time
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
Cyberhaven vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Logo
Cyberhaven vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
June 2025
ManageEngine DataSecurity reportDownload ManageEngine DataSecurity product report
Buyer's Guide
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
June 2025
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report
 

Overview

Information not available
ManageEngine

Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

Palo Alto Networks
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
June 2025
Free Report: ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.