ManageEngine DataSecurity vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ManageEngine DataSecurity and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product’s strict policies are its best features.""The detection and alert features are valuable."

More ManageEngine DataSecurity Pros →

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off.""Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information.""Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly.""It is a stable solution with good support."

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The vendor must provide a cloud solution.""The interface must be improved."

More ManageEngine DataSecurity Cons →

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place.""The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization.""There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful.""Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive."
  • "The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."
  • "The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."
  • "Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."
  • More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The detection and alert features are valuable.
    Top Answer:The file integrity monitoring feature is difficult to manage because some files are confidential while others are not. We use a different tool to classify the files as confidential and… more »
    Top Answer:We use the product for real-time data visibility and analysis.
    Top Answer:Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such… more »
    Top Answer:Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly.
    Top Answer:The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization.
    Ranking
    Views
    35
    Comparisons
    28
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,905
    Comparisons
    551
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    840
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ManageEngine DataSecurity is ranked 25th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. ManageEngine DataSecurity is rated 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine DataSecurity writes "An advanced and user-friendly solution that has strict policies against data leakage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention writes "A solution having automation as one of its strongest points". ManageEngine DataSecurity is most compared with , whereas Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Cyberhaven and Symantec Data Loss Prevention. See our ManageEngine DataSecurity vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.