Malwarebytes vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Malwarebytes and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. Malwarebytes holds a 2.0% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes

Read 37 Malwarebytes reviews

3,962 Views
3,407 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

10,526 Views
7,895 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Malwarebytes compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive enterprise-level solutions, but Malwarebytes is preferred for its user-friendliness.

Features: Trellix stands out with its centralized management capability, providing users with a platform that integrates features like data loss prevention, endpoint encryption, and regulatory compliance. Its users highlight the ePolicy Orchestrator for managing multiple security applications. Additionally, its strong encryption methods secure sensitive data effectively. Malwarebytes focuses on robust malware detection with a lightweight setup that doesn’t affect system performance. It offers straightforward usability, especially for SMEs, and prioritizes efficient malware threat prevention.

Room for Improvement: Trellix users often cite high CPU usage and resource demands as a drawback, along with complex configuration settings that need streamlining. Improved documentation and faster technical support responses are also sought-after areas. Malwarebytes could work on reducing false positives, enhance detailed logging, and offer stronger integration with other security tools to expand operational capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers flexible deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and cloud, though the setup can be complex, requiring substantial IT expertise. Its support tends to receive mixed reviews due to occasional slow response times. Meanwhile, Malwarebytes is praised for its easy deployment, especially in cloud environments, and is noted for high responsiveness in customer support, though Mac and Linux support can sometimes be lacking.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is perceived as expensive but offers a high return on investment due to reduced costs from potential security breaches. Its pricing model accommodates larger deployments well. Malwarebytes is more affordable, especially for smaller businesses, yet can become costly with additional features. Customers appreciate its cost-effectiveness in its base licensing, but automatic billing practices have caused concern among some users.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,641 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Anas Anas

Solution Consultant at Creation for Smart Software Development

Effective threat predictions, simple to deploy, and light on resources

Malwarebytes's initial setup is simple. It is easy to deploy and configure the policies and the configuration. I deployed Malwarebytes for one customer and I did it in under two days. They had approximately 50 users, it took approximately an hour. The steps I took for the implementation were downloading the Malwarebytes management console from the site, installing it, then running the discovery tool, scanning my network, and checking all of the PCs on my network. It's already pre-configured, you don't need to configure anything. The only configuration that I did on the administration console was some of the exclusion from the scan. This is the only rule that I have created. I rate the initial setup of Malwarebytes a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the agents, user experience, efficiency of the findings, and MDR features."

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"Being able to cloud manage it from just a cloud login is valuable. We can get to it from anywhere, which is really helpful. The fact that we can remediate from the cloud console is one of our favorite features."

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."

"Malwarebytes is a comprehensive solution for keeping endpoints safe and secure from intruders, viruses, malware and so on."

"It allows us to have better knowledge of the way people use the tool and how we can improve their workflows."

"Provides successful ransomware shut down operations."

More Malwarebytes pros

"A big advantage of McAfee Endpoint Security is the ability to manage very big environments. We are supporting environments with 200,000 to 300,000 endpoints. The ability to manage with one single console is very important for us. McAfee has phenomenally improved in terms of detection. It provides real-time detection and response with the error, Real Protect, and reputations. It is not only based on signatures but also on behavior analytics, artificial intelligence, or machine learning. We have environments that never had issues with ransomware in the last 20 years. McAfee has a very good performance in this field."

"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."

"The independent modules are very good."

"Provides protection against threats."

"The detection capability of Trellix Endpoint Security is higher than traditional antivirus solutions."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"Malwarebytes should improve its mobile compatibility."

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it. It doesn't tie things or provide SHA-1 and SHA-256 detection information, which makes it hard to do an additional investigation."

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."

"The online reporting needs to be improved. Currently, we have to look at it online, and if we want to download a report, it just downloads as an Excel file. It's just raw information. There needs to be some way to better display it when it's downloaded."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

More Malwarebytes cons

"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."

"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."

"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."

"Support-wise they need to be better."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."

"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."

"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

More Malwarebytes pricing and cost advice

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

"I think Trellix is more on the higher side of the market, just on a general scale, but I also think it depends on what particular package you choose."

"It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

"I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money."

"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."

"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

University

11%

Comms Service Provider

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes

Compared 10% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes

Compared 7% of the time

More Malwarebytes Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes

July 2025

Download Malwarebytes product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

Malwarebytes is used for malware detection, endpoint protection, ransomware prevention, and behavior monitoring on Windows and Mac, serving as an EDR for detecting usage behaviors and providing comprehensive security features.

Primarily deployed for compliance scanning, real-time threat monitoring, and as a supplementary antivirus, Malwarebytes is favored for security assessments, cloud management, and endpoint protection for both personal and company use. Featuring robust scanning, ease of use, and a user-friendly interface, it effectively prevents and removes malware, detects unwanted programs, and provides real-time updates. The management interface and dashboard offer strong endpoint protection, automated updates, detailed reporting, and quick remediation, minimizing downtime. Comprehensive protection, extensive visibility, and efficient performance are highly valued.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes?

Robust Scanning and Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and removes malware.
Ease of Use: Simple and straightforward interface for users.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and management dashboards.
Cloud Management: Manage endpoints through cloud-based solutions.
Automated Updates: Ensures protection with regular updates.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive and detailed security reports.
Quick Remediation: Minimizes downtime with fast threat removal.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Ensures security against diverse threats.
Effective Performance: Maintains system performance while protecting.
Minimized Downtime: Quick threat removal ensures business continuity.
Extensive Visibility: Detailed logs and reports for better oversight.

Industries implementing Malwarebytes benefit from enhanced endpoint protection, compliance scanning, and security assessments. It is frequently utilized in IT departments for real-time threat monitoring, automated remediation, and cloud management, providing organizations with reliable security for both personal and company endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.