Logz.io vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Logz.io and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Logz.io is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.4, while Seceon is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. Logz.io holds a 0.3% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Logz.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Logz.io

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

496 Views
347 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,339 Views
561 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Logz.io

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Logz.io and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are both prominent solutions in the cybersecurity space. Based on user feedback, Logz.io generally receives positive marks for its deployment and customer service, while Seceon stands out for its robust features and overall value.

Features: Logz.io has comprehensive logging capabilities, a user-friendly setup, and is ideal for real-time monitoring and quick issue resolution. Seceon offers advanced threat detection, automated responses, and powerful analytics with an intuitive dashboard.

Room for Improvement: Logz.io users request better scalability and enhanced integration with third-party tools. Seceon users suggest better documentation and more customization options for alerts and reports. Both products could benefit from expanded feature sets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logz.io is known for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support. Seceon's deployment is complex but is balanced with extensive documentation and a responsive support team, though Logz.io has a slight edge in customer service satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Logz.io has competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI in terms of operational efficiency. Seceon has higher upfront costs but offers superior ROI due to comprehensive threat management features that enhance security posture, which users believe justifies the additional expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logz.io

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (20th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Logz.io is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"I like that it's an AI-based platform. The most valuable feature is that it's a comprehensive solution. Most tools in the marketplace are comprised of miscellaneous items. They fail to provide real-time remediation features. However, with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, anything you can think of in cybersecurity, like auto-remediation, real-time response, and even on-premise components, is available in a single platform. So, it's perfect for finance and healthcare who don't want to share their data with a third party like the cloud. You can have this on-premise as well. So, the expenditure will be lower as less human intervention is required."

"The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"The tool is an open source product."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product is a little expensive."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 25% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 19% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logz.io

Compared 11% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 13% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io

April 2025

Download Logz.io product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

April 2025

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

Logz

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Logz.io

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logz.io vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.