LinkRunner vs NetBrain comparison

Read 6 NetBrain reviews

3,197 Views
224 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

LinkRunner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

LinkRunner and NetBrain are two widely used network management tools. NetBrain offers superior features and functionality, making it worth the higher price despite LinkRunner's advantages in pricing and customer support.

Features:LinkRunner is praised for its simplicity and efficiency in performing basic network testing tasks. It also provides straightforward utility and quick results. On the other hand, NetBrain offers advanced automation features, comprehensive diagnostics, and superior visualization. Users value NetBrain's enhanced mapping capabilities, making it more desirable for complex network management tasks.

Room for Improvement:Users suggest LinkRunner could enhance advanced diagnostics, provide better integration capabilities, and expand on feature depth. For NetBrain, improvements are recommended in user onboarding, documentation clarity, and simplifying its complex features to reduce the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:LinkRunner is often highlighted for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service. In contrast, NetBrain's deployment is more complex due to its extensive capabilities but is well-supported by comprehensive customer service. Despite this, users prefer LinkRunner for quicker setup times.

Pricing and ROI:LinkRunner is considered cost-effective with a straightforward ROI. NetBrain, while more expensive, is deemed worth the investment due to its advanced feature set. Users note that NetBrain's overall value justifies the higher setup cost in the long term.

To learn more, read our detailed LinkRunner vs. NetBrain Report (Updated: March 2026).

LinkRunner vs. NetBrain

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LinkRunner

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetBrain

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

17th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of LinkRunner is 8.1%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetBrain is 3.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LinkRunner	8.1%
NetBrain	3.1%
Other	88.8%

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

Jesse_B

Manager of networks and infrastructure at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Impressive ease of use, gives comprehensive results in seconds, and saves a lot of time and resources

I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources. Its ease of use is very impressive. LinkRunner allows me to have my technicians run tests that are normally too complex and require a network specialist. AutoTest works with just one click. AutoTest does a lot of testing that would normally require a network specialist to log in to a switch and check out VLAN based on a port. My technicians don't have to log in to the switch anymore. They can just do AutoTest and information is provided online. So, I no longer have to send a specialist. I can have my technician run these very complex tests. It saves me on resources, time, and site visits. When it comes to troubleshooting, based on my experience, it has given very useful and very helpful information, especially for my field technicians. It has reduced my visits and the amount of presence because it gives a very comprehensive report on your network tests. It tests multiple variables and multiple parameters and gives a very informative report that makes it easy to pinpoint what is the root cause. There are many tools in this one solution. It's basically a bunch of toolkits or tool sets in one device, which makes it very powerful testing equipment.

Read full review

Deborah Gamelin

Vice President at Asset Track for Cloud, LLC

Good monitoring and troubleshoot capabilities, improves overall network traffic visibility

In my organization, we had 130,000 network devices that needed to be brought into the solution and mapped. NetBrain can handle the scale but the engineers that manage those devices have to go in and update all of them to allow NetBrain permission to poll them. It can get a little stressful for everybody when you're trying to roll out new stuff when you've got other issues that have to be addressed with other devices. In some cases, our devices had no automation at all. One example is the Cisco 3650. Right now, if you went through the inventory list, you see that we have different versions running. Some are on one version, whereas others are on another version. The problem with upgrading them is that they need to be done overnight because we don't want to disrupt any network traffic during business hours. Consequently, it could take us years to upgrade the versions before we can even get them onto these new tools. This may be an internal issue but it's a big one when you have a lot of devices. Even if you had 10,000 devices, it's still an issue. You have to consider the compatibility of the device against the tool, and being able to use certain commands to upgrade it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AutoTest feature makes it easy for you on both ends. It's an excellent feature, especially if you're by yourself. You plug one end in and you hit AutoTest. It sits and waits for you to plug in the other end and it starts testing."

"In terms of network validation, and copper and fiber Ethernet configuration, I can't imagine life without LinkRunner devices."

"Something that would normally take me an hour is done in less than a minute."

"Compared to what I paid for it, it's paid for itself three times over."

"Having the results sent directly, via email, from the LinkRunner itself makes it really great for logging different things that you're trying to document within your organization. You can have a paper trail of what your organization has as far as infrastructure goes."

"The most valuable feature is the end-to-end testing with the "dart," as they call it, where you can test for faults in the cable or if they've been terminated properly."

"LinkRunner makes the configuration of the copper and fiber Ethernet networks a lot simpler."

"Performance testing is the most valuable feature. It gives a brief summary of the information we're looking at, such as latency, jitter, and the available throughput."

Cons

"One of the things I'd like to see in future versions of LinkRunner is a wireless dongle embedded into the product so that I don't need to have a separate wireless dongle."

"You will be disappointed if you're in the field for eight hours daily, expecting this product to be on six or seven of those hours."

"A few annoyances stop it from being a great product, but it is definitely extremely handy."

"I'm in a situation right now where they've released firmware for bug fixes, but we cannot access those, which makes the device almost useless."

"It runs tests quickly, but it takes a while to boot up. It's somewhat disappointing that LinkRunner takes some time to turn on. When I arrive in the space, I usually spend the first two minutes waiting."

"One area where LinkRunner could be improved is the battery life."

"If it weren't for the battery, it would probably get an eight out of 10. But because of the battery, it's infuriating and it's not reliable."

"Power over Ethernet (POE) Switch Port Charging Of Batteries is an area of the product with room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We... decided to go with NetAlly for the price and the bang for the buck."

"The price was fine. You pay for the unit, and there are no licensing or maintenance fees."

"I didn't have to buy it, but if I was going to have my choice, I wouldn't buy it just because of the price point. It works pretty well to do one thing. For the cost, it is definitely not worth it. There are other products out there that can do the same thing for probably 70% less. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"The area where the product could be improved is by having a lower cost so that I could have more than one. The price is competitive, but everybody would always like to see the price go down. I'd buy another one if it were cheaper."

"It's an expensive device. Don't expect it to be cheap. But the pricing is good. It certainly seemed in line with anything else I was looking at at the time."

"I would buy another one if I had a chance but they're too expensive. If they made it a bit cheaper, I think a lot of network engineers and network administrators would immediately jump onto it."

"Compared to another company's product, LinkRunner is cheaper, but it's still about $1,000 too expensive, considering that the operating system is a free operating system. The OS has just been tweaked to give you a graphical interface. I don't think it's priced right."

"The cost of this device is very expensive, especially with the NetAlly Care on top of the costs. It is not for personal use and would be very expensive for smaller businesses."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

University

11%

Government

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Comparisons

NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs LinkRunner

Compared 23% of the time

LinkSprinter vs LinkRunner

Compared 17% of the time

IxChariot vs LinkRunner

Compared 16% of the time

AirMagnet Survey PRO vs LinkRunner

Compared 15% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner

Compared 14% of the time

Product Reports

LinkRunner

Download LinkRunner product report

Download NetBrain product report

Overview

LinkRunner offers network engineers a fast, comprehensive tool for validating network links and troubleshooting copper and fiber connectivity issues, suitable for today's demanding environments.

Designed for network technicians, LinkRunner combines speed and precision for effective network link validation and diagnostics. The AT 1500 and 3000 models provide frontline engineers with powerful troubleshooting tools for both copper and fiber networks, while the advanced AT 4000 model supports Multigigabit NBASE-T and fiber Ethernet networks with detailed network discovery capabilities.

What key features does LinkRunner offer?

Efficient AutoTest: Offers instant diagnostics and efficient network validation.
LLDP Decoding: Simplifies port identification beyond minimum requirements.
Cloud Integration: Results are auto-saved to the cloud, facilitating easy access.
PoE Testing: Provides thorough Power over Ethernet evaluations.
Latency and Throughput: Performs comprehensive performance testing.

What benefits should be considered?

Ease of Use: A streamlined interface enhances user experience.
Time Efficiency: Reduces IT staff time with quick diagnostics and swift troubleshooting capabilities.
Improved Access: Cloud integration allows convenient access to diagnostic results.
Multi-environment Compatibility: Offers robust performance in both wired and wireless setups.

Network analysts and engineers leverage LinkRunner for tasks like testing fiber optic links, network discovery, and cable installation validation. Industries favor its PoE testing and bandwidth checks, ensuring reliable switch connectivity and thorough performance evaluations, effectively addressing network troubleshooting and performance testing requirements.

NetAlly

Managing today’s networks with yesterday’s manual processes is no longer a viable solution. NetBrain’s network automation platform provides actionable insights into your network to help you make better and faster decisions - particularly when you’re troubleshooting, securing, and making changes to the network.

Sample Customers

Philips Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, University of South Dakota, Memorial Hermann, Baltimore County Public Schools, Aaramrak.

CompuCon, TD Ameritrade, Move Inc.

LinkRunner vs. NetBrain