Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Klaviyo vs Structured comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Klaviyo
Ranking in Marketing Automation
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Email (15th)
Structured
Ranking in Marketing Automation
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Channel Marketing Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Marketing Automation category, the mindshare of Klaviyo is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Structured is 1.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Marketing Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
StructuredWeb1.9%
Klaviyo2.2%
Other95.9%
Marketing Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use Klaviyo?
Share your opinion
Joan Morales - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool
The best features in the solution include the ease of use and flexibility of the tool, and its ability to accommodate different kinds of features and needs that we always come across and need to solve for. The ability to provide content and deliver content to an international audience of channel partners is significant for us. Being able to cater to international users globally is one of the great uses of the tool. StructuredWeb can implement AI capabilities within the tool, which we have deployed, is really quite unique and very helpful. Additionally, the ability to translate content to any language with AI translation integrated as part of the tool allows one partner to access a piece of content and translate it to any language for their own use. My impression of the solution's focus on partner marketing is that it has improved our marketing efforts. We have been able to replace existing tools that we had with multiple tools. Consolidating everything in one single tool—StructuredWeb—has allowed us to save costs through the process and solve for lower management costs from our perspective. It has improved our TCO and also helped us to provide a better experience for our partners because now everything is in the same tool instead of managing two different tools that do not talk to each other easily, improving the experience for partners.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Marketing Automation solutions are best for your needs.
871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StructuredWeb?
The pricing for StructuredWeb is not cheap; it's certainly one of the more expensive projects of its type within the company. However, it is cheaper than E2open used to be for VMware, which had a l...
What needs improvement with StructuredWeb?
To improve the solution, I think the most important change would be expanding the number of files supported for import. One of the ongoing issues we've had is the platform's ability to consume cont...
What is your primary use case for StructuredWeb?
My main use cases for StructuredWeb are twofold: one is for posting content for our reseller partners to consume and co-brand with, which is primarily for our larger reseller partners. For smaller ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
StructuredWeb
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hydro Flask, Citizen, Vuor1, Mattel, Uniliver, Coty
IBM, ServiceNow, Ingram, Veeam, Google, Zoom, Qlik, Arrow, Dell, Microsoft, TD Synnex, HPE
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Adobe, HubSpot and others in Marketing Automation. Updated: October 2025.
871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.