Keap vs SleekFlow comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Keap
Ranking in CRM
50th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SleekFlow
Ranking in CRM
61st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Keap is 0.2%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SleekFlow is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

MD
Jan 13, 2016
The integrated shopping cart with email marketing and click tracking are valuable features.
Integrated shopping cart with email marketing Click tracking Customer life cycle marketing We have used it to score our clients and prospects. It has powerful integration into WordPress and membership sites that can create custom experiences based on clicks and tracking. This is able to be…
Use SleekFlow?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Infusionsoft
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Titin, Cleancorp Cleaning Service, LeftFoot Coaching Academy, Salon Success Strategies, Roeder Studios, Mint Social, Optibike, Select Photo-Graphics, Mosquito Squad of Greater DC, The Rocket Company, Blue Chip Athletic, Burleson Orthodontics, Presidential Pools, Blue Cow Creative Design & Production, Ptex Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, monday.com and others in CRM. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.