Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs SonicWall Email Security comparison

SonicWall Email Security and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server are products competing in the email protection category. Data comparisons suggest that while SonicWall stands out in pricing and support, Kaspersky is seen as offering more comprehensive features.

Features: SonicWall Email Security includes robust threat detection algorithms, advanced filtering capabilities, and reliable configuration flexibility. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server integrates strong anti-malware and anti-spam engines and advanced reporting features, with comprehensive protective measures against evolving threats.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall can improve by offering the ability to block attachments by extension type in Office and enhancing macro blocking configurations. Enhancements in its user interface and more timely feature updates could also be beneficial. Kaspersky could improve by simplifying its deployment process, offering easier integration options, and reducing complexity in setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, allowing quicker integration into existing systems. In contrast, Kaspersky's deployment is more complex but is supported by comprehensive documentation and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Email Security is recognized for competitive setup costs and offering a satisfactory ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, although requiring a higher initial investment, offers substantial ROI due to its extensive feature set and security capabilities.