Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs Morphisec comparison

Kaspersky and Morphisec are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Kaspersky is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.6, while Morphisec is ranked #60. Kaspersky holds a 0.6% mindshare in EDR, compared to Morphisec’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Morphisec users who would recommend it.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Read 12 Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud reviews

795 Views
716 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Morphisec

Read 21 Morphisec reviews

1,876 Views
1,051 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Morphisec

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Morphisec and Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud are competing endpoint protection products. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has the upper hand with its feature richness, making it an attractive option despite being more expensive.

Features: Morphisec has a lightweight architecture, prevents zero-day attacks, and causes minimal disruptions. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud provides comprehensive threat detection, automated vulnerability assessments, and management tools. Users find Kaspersky's extensive features worth the investment despite its complexity.

Room for Improvement: Morphisec should improve its reporting capabilities and user documentation. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud should focus on a more intuitive navigation structure and reducing system impact. Kaspersky users report a more cumbersome experience compared to Morphisec.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Morphisec is known for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer support. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has a complex implementation phase but performs effectively post-deployment. Morphisec users benefit from rapid setup and responsive service, while Kaspersky users face a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Morphisec offers competitive pricing and solid ROI with quick setup and maintenance savings. Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, despite higher initial costs, delivers substantial ROI through its comprehensive protection features. Users find Morphisec more affordable but acknowledge the long-term security benefits of Kaspersky.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Ransomware Protection (8th)

Morphisec

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

60th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (64th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (53rd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (35th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (33rd), Threat Deception Platforms (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Morphisec is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Zunair Aftab

Supports Engineer at Rawad IT Solutions

Security features excel while management tools face challenges

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud has proven to be a robust and comprehensive solution for endpoint protection. So far, no major negative features have been observed. However, email security integration with Microsoft 365 has room for improvement. In a recent real-world incident, a company received 10 phishing emails, of which only three were blocked by the system. Enhancing detection accuracy to block 7 or more would significantly improve trust and effectiveness. With the on-premises version, there's a known issue where assigning a device to a new group results in it being auto-assigned back to the previous group. Fixing this bug would greatly streamline device management. Additionally, in the cloud version, once a device is assigned to a user, it cannot be reassigned without deleting the user or the device entirely. It would be far more user-friendly if the platform allowed simple reassignment or de-assignment, returning the device to an "unassigned" state. As for automated behavioral analysis, while current functionality is based on machine learning, upgrading to true AI-powered detection could bring substantial improvements. Ideally, the system should proactively flag potential threats, and offer administrators the option to either allow or block applications based on intelligent risk analysis

Read full review

Rick Schibler

VP of Information Technology at Kentucky Trailer

Offers in-memory protection at a lower price than competitors

Morphisec's in-memory protection is probably the most valuable feature because it stops malicious activity from occurring. If something tries to install or act as a sleeper agent, Morphisec will detect and stop it. Morphisec's Moving Target Defense is critical to hardening our attack surface. If it detects something, it indicates whether it's valid. That means you've got a breach requiring investigation. It detects anomalies but doesn't necessarily point to what caused them. You still need to do that work. The solution is reasonably easy to administer. They made some changes last year, adding a cloud-based monitoring solution that makes deploying and monitoring our endpoints easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kaspersky has a Cloud Discovery feature. There is no template in Kaspersky. They provide a temporary risk assessment of the cloud services. For example, if we want to block public storage services like OneDrive or Google Drive, we need to specify each individually. The main difference is that Kaspersky's process takes more time because it requires individual input."

"In Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, anti-phishing and anti-malware are two very powerful aspects."

"I find the EDR service valuable as it adds extra protection and provides a centralized view."

"The platform's ability to update the database from my device and manage user profiles is quite effective."

"I would say that Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud is one of the best, very effective software because of its vulnerability assessment and threat assessments."

"It is a powerful tool for zero-day attack prevention."

"We had the cloud suite of KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud, and its monitoring was fine."

"The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pros

"All the alerts are on the dashboard, which is quite simple and useful for us. You can easily check all the alerts that are being blocked or allowed, or whatever the action is. You can easily see that and you can take the necessary actions. You can add a PowerShell extension or any activities for blocking at your network level or for endpoints."

"Morphisec Guard enables us to see at a glance whether our users have device control and disk encryption enabled properly. This is important because we are a global company operating with multiple entities. Previously, we didn't have that visibility. Now, we have visibility so we can pinpoint some locations where there are machines that are not really protected, offline, etc. It gives us visibility, which is good."

"Morphisec has absolutely helped save money on our security stack. The ransomware at the end of the day can cost organizations millions upon millions of dollars. Investing in tools like Morphisec is a great reduction in that cost. If I can spend $10,000 in a year to protect assets that could be ransomed for $20,000,000, that's definitely a bet that one should pursue. Morphisec absolutely it's worth the investment."

"Morphisec makes it very easy for IT teams of any size to prevent breaches of critical systems because of the design of their tool. When we evaluated Morphisec, the CIO and I sat and listened. What attracted us to them is the fact that it stops activity at the point of detection. That saves a lot of time because now we are not investigating and trying to trace down what to turn off. We have already prevented it, which makes it very much safer and more secure."

"Morphisec stops attacks without needing to know what type of threat it is, just that it is foreign. It is based on injections, so it would know when a software launches. If a software launches and something else also launches, then it would count that as anomalous and block it. Because the software looks at the code, and if it executes something else that is not related, then Morphisec would block it. That is how it works."

"The biggest feature is that it hides everything from your operating system that's running in-memory from anything to try to run against it. That's the most unique thing that's on the market. There's nothing else out there that's quite like that. That's a big selling point and why we went with it. It does exactly what the design does. If you can't find it, you can't execute against it."

"Morphisec has enabled us to become a lot less paranoid when it comes to staff clicking on things or accessing things that they shouldn't that could infect the whole system. Our original ransomware attack that happened came from someone's Google drive and then just filtered on through that. It has put our minds at ease a lot more in running it. It's also another layer of security that has been proven to be effective for us."

"We have seen it successfully block attacks that a traditional antivirus did not pick up."

More Morphisec pros

Cons

"The solution’s stability could be improved because we earlier faced an issue where the solution was not detecting file-less malware."

"Kaspersky's global ranking has been on the decline."

"It requires specific expertise or certified professionals to deploy the product. There is a need to expand the offerings to various industries covering different-sized businesses."

"While the product provides a good level of protection, we need better support, especially in terms of being kept informed about new threats and specific configurations needed."

"Kaspersky doesn't provide local support."

"Kaspersky's cloud solution should be improved because the on-premises features are unavailable in the cloud."

"The tool's update management can be better. In future releases, the addition of a DLP module would be valuable."

"One area where the product could be improved is in its delivery and installation process."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud cons

"If anything, tech support might be their weakest link. The process of getting someone involved sometimes takes a little time. It seems to me that they should have all the data they need to let me know whether an alert is legitimate or not, but they tend to need a lot of information from me to get to the bottom of something. It usually takes a little longer than I would expect."

"We sometimes have to depend on the support team to know what action we should take. If the solution for an alert can be built into the report that we are getting, it will save time, and the interaction with support would be less. At times, corrective action is required, but at times, we don't need to take any action. It would be good if we get to know in the report that a particular infection doesn't require any action. It will save us time and effort."

"In the Windows Defender integration, they have put in a report of computers that need Windows Defender updates. If those updates could be kicked off directly from the dashboard, instead of having to go to another system entirely, that would be good."

"It would be useful for them if they had some kind of network discovery. That kind of functionality I think would give IT administrators a little bit more confidence that they have 100 percent coverage, and it gives them something to audit against. Network discovery would be one area I would definitely suggest that they put some effort into."

"It would be nice if they could integrate Morphisec with other traditional antivirus solutions beyond Microsoft Defender. That is probably my biggest gripe."

"Morphisec is a venture startup. They are still early in their growth stage. They need to get mature on their customer support and on how they interface with system tools. For example, they need to get multifactor in place and an API for the major multi-factor systems, e.g., Okta, Duo, Ping, and Microsoft. They don't have them built in yet. They are working on them. It is just not there yet. Also, their stability, customer support, and processes need improvement, which is just part of maturity."

"The dashboard is the area that requires the most improvement. We have about, I would say 5,500 computers currently, and searching through all of those takes some time to filter. So as soon as you apply the filter, it takes a few seconds. It crunches, it thinks, and then it brings up the clients that match."

"We have only had four attacks in the last year, "attacks" being some benign PDF from a vendor that, for some reason, were triggered. There were no actual attacks. They were just four false positives, or something lowly like adware. There have been false positives with both the on-premises solution and the cloud solution."

More Morphisec cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The solution is moderately priced and cannot be considered an expensive or cheap tool."

"The product is averagely priced."

"The product’s price is flexible."

"I find Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud more accessible in terms of pricing."

"We had to pay an annual licensing fee for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud."

"The pricing is favorable, and there are no additional expenses associated with using the product."

"The platform is expensive."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud pricing and cost advice

"It is a little bit more expensive than other security products that we use, but it does provide us good protection. So, it is a trade-off."

"Licenses are per endpoint, and that's true for the cloud version as well. The only difference is that there is a little extra charge for the cloud version."

"It does not have multi-tenants. If South Africa wants to show only the machines that they have, they need their own cloud incidence. It is not possible to have that in a single cloud incidence with multiple tenants in it, instead you need to have multiple cloud incidences. Then, if you have that, it will be more expensive. However, they are going to change that, which is good."

"Price-wise, it's on the higher side. A traditional antivirus solution is cheaper, but in terms of security and manageability, its ROI is better than a traditional antivirus. I would recommend it to anybody evaluating or considering an antivirus solution. If your system gets compromised, the cost of ransom would be a lot more. This way, it saves a lot of cost."

"Our licensing is tied into our contract. Because we have a long-term contract, our pricing is a little bit lower. It is per year, so we don't get charged per endpoint, but we do have a cap. Our cap is 80 endpoints. If we were to go over 80, when we renewed our contract, which is not until three years are over. Then, they would reevaluate, and say, "Well, you have more than 80 devices active right now. This is going to be the price change." They know that we are installing and replacing computers, so the numbers will be all over the place depending on whether you archive or don't archive, which is the reason why we just have to keep up on that stuff."

"Morphisec is reasonably priced because our parent company's other subsidiaries use different products like CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is four or five times more expensive than Morphisec. The competitive pricing saves us money in our overall security stack."

"It is an annual subscription basis per device. For the devices that we have in scope right now, it is about $25,000 a year."

"The pricing is definitely fair for what it does."

More Morphisec pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Outsourcing Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

The product works perfectly to prevent malware in our organization.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

No advise, its pretty simple

See all answers

What needs improvement with KasperskyEndpoint Security Cloud?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Morphisec

Compared 24% of the time

Halcyon vs Morphisec

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Morphisec

Compared 11% of the time

Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs Morphisec

Compared 10% of the time

Hyver vs Morphisec

Compared 9% of the time

More Morphisec Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud

August 2025

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud report

Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Morphisec

August 2025

Download Morphisec product report

Also Known As

No data available

Morphisec, Morphisec Moving Target Defense

Overview

All you need to protect Windows desktops and file servers, Mac OS devices, iOS and Android mobiles and even Microsoft Oﬀice 365.

Just sign up for an account instead of getting tied up in hardware and software provisioning.

Pre-defined policies are automatically applied to each newly connected device, delivering immediate protection.

Be anywhere and protect anywhere using a cloud-based console.

Secure geographically separated oﬀices, home or field-based workers, at their desks or on the go regardless of device type.

Enable remote encryption to make sure your corporate data is safe, even if a device gets lost or stolen.

Shadow IT discovery manages uncontrolled sharing of corporate data in the cloud and reveals users wasting time on social media and messengers.

Ensure compliance readiness with a Data Discovery audit of your personal and financial data in the cloud.

Enable safe collaboration and communication in Microsoft Oﬀice 365 - protection for all its major apps is already included in the Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud Plus and Pro tiers.

Root Cause Analysis provides an attack visualization so you can see the cause and path of an attack.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) provides simple investigation tools an effortless response to evasive threats.

Advance your skills with online cybersecurity training included in Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pro.

Kaspersky

Morphisec integrates seamlessly with platforms like Microsoft Defender, offering signatureless protection against zero-day threats and ransomware. It enhances existing endpoint solutions with minimal maintenance through its set-and-forget deployment, providing heightened security and reduced false positives.

Morphisec strengthens defense strategies by merging memory morphing and signatureless protection to effectively block zero-day attacks and ransomware. It operates efficiently within existing infrastructure, reducing system impact and maintenance needs. Users find its full visibility dashboard invaluable. Despite its strengths, cloud deployment and reporting features can be improved. Stability, alerts, and integration with other systems pose challenges for users, impacting usability and support quality.

What are Morphisec's key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with Microsoft Defender for comprehensive dashboard visibility
Memory Morphing: Hides processes to reduce attack surfaces
Signatureless Protection: Prevents threats without impacting performance
Automatic Threat Blocking: Uses inbuilt intelligence to detect risks
Set-and-Forget Deployment: Simplifies management and reduces maintenance

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Quick Deployment: Fast setup without disrupting operations
Enhanced Protection: Provides an additional defense layer against advanced threats
Cost-Effectiveness: Works with existing licenses, minimizing extra investments
Improved Compatibility: Integrates smoothly with current antivirus systems
Minimal System Impact: Operates efficiently without overloading resources

In security-focused industries, Morphisec is crucial for protecting workstations and servers against sophisticated attacks like ransomware. Its signatureless technology offers early threat detection, while compatibility with existing systems ensures seamless integration, providing advanced protection without additional licensing costs.

Morphisec

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lenovo/Motorola, TruGreen, Covenant Health, Citizens Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec

July 2025

Free Report: Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs. Morphisec report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.