No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (25th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (28th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
167
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack is designed for Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.7% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.4% mindshare, down 3.8% since last year.
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack0.9%
Darktrace16.2%
Cisco Secure Network Analytics9.7%
Other73.2%
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.4%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint7.0%
CrowdStrike Falcon6.2%
Other83.4%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

FarkhundAbbas - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Engineer at adcb
The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good
If my primary solution is down, no backup solution is available to restore it. It is one of the biggest weaknesses of the platform. If I need to update the solution, there is no option to pick the events and the logs from it and deploy it in another solution. The backup and recovery features of the product are not good. I need backup. If the tool is down for some time, I cannot get the logs at that particular time.
PankajKumar24 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd
Advanced threat prevention has strengthened incident response and customized security workflows
The biggest advantage of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is the ATP solution, which provides advanced threat prevention. Machine learning algorithms are available in the product as part of the threat anti-malware, including predictive machine learning and behavioral analysis, which are integral to the anti-malware module of EPP. In terms of my experience with the machine learning algorithms for analysis and threat detection, we are analyzing logs provided by Trellix, but we are not able to conduct specific machine learning analysis on those logs. The automated response mechanisms in the products help with incident management because we have to create playbooks in Trellix console for automation, which we need to enable. The customizable dashboard of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform definitely contributes to the decision-making process, as we customize the dashboard according to customer requirements. When it comes to integration aspects, we are able to integrate Trellix Endpoint Security Platform with SIEM or SOAR solutions using the ePO console, which enhances threat detection capabilities. Reporting and analytics aspects have an impact on security posture assessment, as we are able to fetch reports in the ePO console customized according to customer requirements for downloading and sending via email.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The email security feature is really good."
"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."
"The Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform provides visibility into telemetry data, enabling comprehensive monitoring of environmental activities."
"The product's deployment phase is easy."
"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"
"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"We use McAfee MVISION Endpoint to protect our environment."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
 

Cons

"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."
"I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products."
"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates."
"We don't like the solution since it requires much memory consumption and consumes much CPU resources."
"AV management based on manual scan Manual scan feature is not easily done A long way of setting hostname set, and Scheduling over policy which is time taking and I don't feel comfortable."
"It ended up not being what we hoped for in an endpoint solution."
"We have had some of our clients not happy with McAfee Endpoint Security because it blocks some of the applications they are trying to use. They should make it easier to unblock applications."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has competitive pricing."
"Kaspersky is one of the cheaper solutions."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is cheap."
"The price of the solution is in the middle range compare to others and could be reduced. There are not any additional costs."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"There's a subscription on a yearly basis. It's not that expensive; it's quite affordable."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
"The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.
896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
7%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business68
Midsize Enterprise39
Large Enterprise67
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
I think the tool is still not really good enough for integration compared to other products. If you need to integrate with the ecosystem of the Kaspersky primary, and if we are going to the third p...
What advice do you have for others considering Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
I recommend the tool for enterprise customers. Previously, carry, like only antivirus products, was used by many. If you want to upsell a product, then you need to go with EDR and Kaspersky Anti-Ta...
What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform?
I use the solution in my company since it has many good features, like sandbox features and other tech aspects. When I find other use cases or see feedback, I learn what the tool's strengths are fr...
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Endpoint Security?
I don't have visibility on pricing because it is negotiated by a different team, as I look after the technical side.
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Republic of Serbia, Goods.ru, Tael, Insolar
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.