ReadyAPI Test vs k6 Open Source comparison

k6 and SmartBear are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. k6 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5, while SmartBear is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.5. k6 holds a 0.9% mindshare in RTT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of k6 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

k6 Open Source

Read 2 k6 Open Source reviews

778 Views
117 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,488 Views
193 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

k6 Open Source

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

k6 Open Source and ReadyAPI Test are competing tools in the testing domain. ReadyAPI Test appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive capabilities, making it suitable for complex testing requirements.

Features: k6 excels in scalable performance testing, easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, and user-friendly interface making it ideal for continuous testing solutions. ReadyAPI Test includes robust API support, data-driven testing capabilities, and extensive functionality for both functional and performance testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: k6 offers straightforward deployment requiring minimal resources, which enables quick implementation. ReadyAPI Test's deployment is more complex due to its extensive feature set, demanding a steeper learning curve. However, this complexity is mitigated by responsive customer service that assists users during the setup process.

Pricing and ROI: k6 provides a cost-effective solution with a low entry cost, maximizing ROI for organizations with limited budgets. ReadyAPI Test, while having higher initial costs, offers extensive features catering to enterprises that require robust testing solutions. Investing in ReadyAPI Test may be advantageous for businesses seeking a long-term, comprehensive testing framework.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

k6 Open Source

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Load Testing Tools (7th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (22nd), API Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Regression Testing Tools category, the mindshare of k6 Open Source is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Regression Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
k6 Open Source	0.9%
ReadyAPI Test	1.5%
Other	97.6%

Regression Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

NalinGoonawardana

Principal Consultant ( Test automation - Performance testing) at TTC Global (TTC) at TTC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services

One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code approach, could make it more accessible to a broader audience. It would be beneficial to strike a balance where basic tasks can be performed graphically through a user-friendly interface, while still allowing the flexibility for more complex operations through code, similar to how JMeter operates. This could enhance the user experience and make k6 more approachable for those who may not be as comfortable with scripting.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

"The tool's big advantage is that it is more performance-test oriented for experienced testers who know what they are doing. In a normal working setup, performance engineers frequently work with DevOps and development teams. For these teams, k6 Open Source's syntax is much simpler and easier to understand and apply in the working process."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"It's a very simple solution to use."

"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features."

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"SoapUI is uncomplicated and user-friendly."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

Cons

"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

"Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."

"Automation features are not user-friendly."

"It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"The UI should be improved."

"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"The current interface is unsatisfactory."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is not that bad."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"It is free of charge."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about k6 Open Source?

The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?

k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source

Compared 29% of the time

BlazeMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Selenium HQ vs k6 Open Source

Compared 14% of the time

Apache JMeter vs k6 Open Source

Compared 11% of the time

Akamai CloudTest vs k6 Open Source

Compared 9% of the time

More k6 Open Source Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 47% of the time

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

September 2025

Download k6 Open Source product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

September 2025

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

Load Impact

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

Load Impact offers three main features:

Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source

September 2025

Free Report: ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Test vs. k6 Open Source report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.