We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Portfolio's most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and customer-centric."
"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is the many features it provides, such as code integration, documentation, roadmap, and Eclipse. The solution is useful for product managers."
"With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things."
"The most valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the ease of use, many developers are familiar with it."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"The workflows are the most valuable feature of the solution, whether for tasks, bugs, or chain requests from the site. I also like the solution's GUI, which is easy to navigate for everyone."
"The solution is very stable."
"The tool helps us achieve more within the stipulated timeline and budget."
"It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy."
"The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."
"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports."
"The HR aspect of the solution could be improved."
"In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning."
"Currently lacks AWS integration."
"JIRA Portfolio could improve new implementation because if I want integration for the complete wide frame tools it cannot provide any wide frame tools."
"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out."
"We are using the on-premise deployment, but it is slower and not as easy to manage as the cloud version."
"The product could do with more flexible reporting."
"The query features should improve in JIRA Portfolio. For example, if I would have to create my own queries for looking into something such as what business features we have released last month, or the last three months, I don't know if I can do it. The solution requires a certain level of expertise."
"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar."
"The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."
"The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Teamwork report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.