Netrounds and Ixia Hawkeye are competing tools in the network performance testing and monitoring category. Netrounds seems to have the upper hand in ease of deployment and customer support, while Ixia Hawkeye is favored for its feature-rich capabilities and advanced analytics.
Features: Netrounds offers intuitive workflows, automated testing capabilities, and continuous monitoring, making it suitable for detailed reporting. Ixia Hawkeye provides advanced analytics, extensive protocol support, and scalability, offering comprehensive insights into network performance.
Room for Improvement: Netrounds could enhance its scalability, expand its protocol support, and improve its advanced analytics features. Ixia Hawkeye might benefit from simplifying its deployment process, increasing its cost efficiency, and improving the user interface to be more intuitive.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netrounds simplifies deployment with minimal setup and offers responsive support, integrating seamlessly into existing systems. Although Ixia Hawkeye has a comprehensive support system and documentation, its complex deployment process can slow down the initial setup but ensures robust support once operational.
Pricing and ROI: Netrounds provides competitive pricing focusing on cost efficiency, making it ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises seeking fast ROI. Ixia Hawkeye requires a higher initial investment but justifies the cost with its extensive features and depth of insights, benefiting larger organizations looking for detailed performance data analysis.
Netrounds is a programmable test and service assurance solution using software-based and traffic-generating probes, easily used and delivered from the cloud as a SaaS solution or deployed on-premise in NFV environments.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.