No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Interactive Intelligence vs Oracle Fusion Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Interactive Intelligence
Ranking in CRM
49th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
CRM Customer Engagement Centers (5th), Marketing Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the CRM category, the mindshare of Interactive Intelligence is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Fusion Service is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
CRM Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Fusion Service1.2%
Interactive Intelligence0.7%
Other98.1%
CRM
 

Featured Reviews

MA
CX Team Lead
A customizable solution that can be integrated with almost anything
The best thing about this solution is the customizability because it can be integrated with pretty much anything. There are many solutions that are black boxes and we're unable to make any modifications to the call flows. With Interactive Intelligence, we can utilize APIs and variables. With the REST call, you can send a request and response. Elements can be incorporated into the workflow based on the response. This is the go-to thing with Interactive Intelligence. The Interactive Intelligence is quite user friendly. And Avaya, in that case, is not that great solution, on user friendliness. Basically, yeah, the same purpose I've used, but you need more expertise to manage the product. And Interactive Intelligence is one box. It contains a lot of features and we don't need to have much resources. But Avaya and others have many servers to be maintained with a single solution. It has a CN. You have to go for session manager and lots of other product servers. So, for a single solution, you need to maintain a lot of servers. This is more or less an easy environment to manage, but Avaya is very complex on the architectural level.
Dhivakar I - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at Deloitte
Have faced persistent configuration issues and performance delays that slow down large workflows
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configurations, there are restrictions on certain functions that can be used. The solution could be enhanced to better serve customers when dealing with complex programs. The customer's websites face issues with loading properly, and response time gets longer when implementing larger workflows. This could be improved to achieve lower response times even with larger workflows involving multiple system integrations and complex architecture. The agent decay capabilities need improvement in future releases. Currently, there are some agent decay configurations available for developers to implement, but this area needs enhancement. Performance issues exist in the Sandbox area. The Sandbox is a trial area for configurations, but if work continues for a long time without publishing, it tends to get corrupted, requiring deletion and rework from the ground up. This has caused significant rework and effort multiple times. Technical support can be challenging to work with. When facing product-related issues or configuration problems, the support experience varies. Sometimes the technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, but often they redirect problems elsewhere and cause delays in resolution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability is really good and it's a really powerful platform that is more powerful than Avaya or other kinds of vendors for contact centers."
"Being able to automate aspects such as outbound confirmation calls has saved us a lot of time and money."
"The social media integration is excellent."
"Interactive Intelligence is quite user friendly."
"Pretty much the entire suite is valuable."
"The most important aspect of Oracle Service Cloud has been the support."
"Oracle Fusion Service offers good efficiency."
"I find the ERP Fusion Console valuable since it centralizes all the modules like order management."
"It has provided a faster turnaround time. We were able to automate a number of transactional tasks and return that extra time to taking care of customers."
"Everything is managed by Oracle, so they have security in place."
"The solution is completely cloud-based and very easy to access from anywhere."
"There is a focus on maintaining efficiency, and it is a significant time saver."
 

Cons

"The problem with this current system is that the support is not great."
"The initial setup can be a bit difficult."
"The problem with this current system is that the support is not great."
"We are not happy with the technical support. They take too long to answer."
"One suggestion I have is to shorten the IT team's response time. When we submit an ASR or similar request, it takes a while to receive a response, and this can be seen as a drawback."
"Their mobile application for this product could be made more attractive as it currently has little functionalities."
"Lacks the ability to deploy custom code for customization."
"Customization of the client's branding establishment instead of the default Oracle brand signs (example: logo in the login Screen)"
"The user experience has to be much better."
"Customer service is fair."
"I would like to see more AI usage, enhanced personalization capabilities, and simpler integration capabilities."
"There are specific areas that would be beneficial to enhance and improve, especially its financial functionality, search capabilities, chat features, and content articles."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There are no extra licenses, everything is included in the subscription, and the price is fixed."
"This is definitely an expensive product compared to others on the market."
"The product has average pricing."
"Oracle Fusion Service is more expensive than Workday."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"Licensing fees are on the higher end and I rate them an eight out of ten."
"Oracle Fusion Service is a cheap and flexible solution."
"Oracle's pricing is quite high, and this cost can be a significant barrier, especially for smaller companies."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
Oracle Fusion Service has many challenges, as it's not easy in customization and for adding features; there's no access for the database directly. For example, we cannot create a database link. We ...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Service Cloud?
The typical use cases for Oracle Fusion Service involve many products and services such as HCM, Supply Chain, Finance, and Fixed Assets.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Service Cloud?
Regarding licensing cost, according to each country's conditions, for Egypt, it's so expensive, whereas for the Gulf, it's almost no cost because they can pay. So I can't definitively say it's high...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ABC Financial, AFAS Software, Quality Bicycle Products, CryptoLogic & WagerLogic, SERVOData, Shinsei Bank, TENAQUIP, MCAP, Visaya Knowledge Process Outsourcing Corporation, Allianz-Tiriac Asigurari, Memira
Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Interactive Intelligence vs. Oracle Fusion Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.