Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs SAS Data Management comparison

Informatica and SAS are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Informatica is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while SAS is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Informatica holds a 6.6% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAS’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Read 17 Informatica Cloud Data Quality reviews
  • 951 Views
  • 941 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
SAS Data Management
Read 17 SAS Data Management reviews
  • 1,524 Views
  • 213 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

SAS Data Management and Informatica Cloud Data Quality are leading solutions in the data quality and management category. SAS Data Management stands out for its cross-functional capabilities and integration options, whereas users often choose Informatica Cloud Data Quality for its advanced cloud-based operations and data handling capabilities.

Features: SAS Data Management offers an extensive suite of features, including ETL, CDC, and MDM, enabling access to diverse data sources efficiently. Its data-cleaning capabilities and flexible language make it powerful for data analysis. Informatica Cloud Data Quality emphasizes Master Data Management and cloud-native features, seamlessly integrating with data governance and featuring a user-friendly rule specification system. Users find it suitable for cloud-focused projects due to its simplicity and performance.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management could improve connectivity with cloud sources and newer databases, and users call for more cost-effective licensing and intuitive interfaces. Informatica Cloud Data Quality requires better legacy system support and enhanced data validation services. Its pricing model is inflexible, with high costs potentially deterring users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Management's on-premises deployment is complex; however, it receives favorable support ratings. Informatica Cloud Data Quality offers flexible cloud deployment, easing integration. It boasts commendable support in cloud settings, though users seek more features.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is criticized for high pricing and a complex licensing structure despite a significant ROI, challenging for smaller organizations. Informatica Cloud Data Quality also presents high costs, with users needing more flexible pricing. Both solutions deliver high ROI in regulated industries, though cost remains a consideration.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.6
Informatica Cloud Data Quality provides trusted data and ROI, but takes two years to realize value unlike Collibra Catalog.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAS Data Management improves data accuracy and reliability, aiding cost efficiency and reporting, crucial in the pharmaceutical industry.
The stability and performance remain issues.
Compared to Collibra Catalog, where the value is noticeable within six months.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Informatica Cloud Data Quality excels in customer support despite initial learning curves and occasional response delays, receiving exceptional ratings.
Sentiment score
7.1
SAS Data Management customer service is generally reliable but mixed, with efficient technical support and room for improvement.
Even after going out of service support, they still reached back to me whenever I raised tickets.
The support is not very good; each ticket starts from scratch as there is no continuity between personnel handling the same ticket.
I would evaluate Informatica's technical support as good.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
reviewer2145525 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer946383 - PeerSpot reviewerMehmet SukruKaya - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Informatica Cloud Data Quality is scalable and efficient, handling large datasets seamlessly in cloud with varying user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.3
SAS Data Management is scalable, supporting enterprises globally with adaptable performance, seamless integration, and efficient complex data handling.
I have used the product over multiple systems and was able to write reports for large data sets without any performance issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Informatica Cloud Data Quality is generally stable, though the on-premise version is more reliable, facing fewer update issues.
Sentiment score
7.6
SAS Data Management is reliable and efficient, with server stability on Linux, but Windows client may require restarts.
There are substantial stability issues with Informatica Cloud Data Quality on the cloud.
I find the stability to be good, with occasional restarts required every two to three months due to glitches.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Room For Improvement

Informatica Cloud Data Quality needs improvements in spatial data handling, connectivity, user interface, configuration, stability, and support access.
SAS Data Management requires improved cost efficiency, flexibility, user interface, cloud capabilities, integration, accessibility, and training resources.
This creates a significant cost and time burden, especially since we followed a strict software development life cycle process, which made creating each rule time-consuming and expensive.
It is not stable, and there are several issues, especially on the cloud side, unlike the on-premise version which was very stable.
The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
reviewer2696502 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer946383 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2145525 - PeerSpot reviewer
ST
 

Setup Cost

Informatica Cloud Data Quality is costly with inflexible pricing, lacking a pay-as-you-go model and incurring high licensing fees.
SAS Data Management is expensive but provides high value, with more affordable solutions integrating multiple functions for data management.
The pricing for Informatica Cloud Data Quality is super expensive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Valuable Features

Informatica Cloud Data Quality provides seamless integration, robust management, AI-driven accuracy, and real-time monitoring for enhanced data quality.
SAS Data Management provides seamless integration, quality, and governance with a user-friendly interface and robust transformation capabilities.
Regarding the features, the dashboards related to data quality profiling are the most powerful tool that we are using, and the integration between EDC and the data quality is very important.
We could run data quality rules as part of Service Bus, which ensured the integrity of customer information before it was entered into our database.
The out-of-the-box features and standard profiling options provide quick visibility of the data within minutes.
For more quotes and insights, download the Informatica Cloud Data Quality report
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
HA
reviewer2696502 - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2145525 - PeerSpot reviewer
ST
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Data Management
Ranking in Data Quality
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (30th), Data Governance (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is 6.6%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 3.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

Mehmet SukruKaya - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved data quality significantly enhances project efficiency and effectiveness
I am not utilizing the data quality rules management part yet. We had a bad experience before Informatica Cloud Data Quality. We started a data analytics project that took more than three months of wasted time because we couldn't use the data to create the optimization model. If we have an application like Informatica Cloud Data Quality or a data quality platform, we can finish the project in less than three months. This is the on-prem data that we ingested. We don't use any cloud data that we have. For now, we are just using the on-prem data, and we don't have any integration from the data outside of the on-prem. I would recommend it to other users. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 9.
Read full review
Vivek Trivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features
The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
I think it would be very useful to have the same features on the data center version available on the cloud version. I remember when I used it, there was some limitation in one of the data quality ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
I worked on a project where we had to use these tools to execute the data quality requirements from assessment perspectives to scorecards and similar tasks. I haven't used any other tools, so I can...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SAS Data Management?
Some clients and I are using SAS Data Management for data cleansing, data warehousing, and IoT-related activities such as streaming data.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Compared 62% of the time
Ataccama ONE Platform vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality Logo
Ataccama ONE Platform vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality Logo
IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Compared 12% of the time
SAP Data Quality Management vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality Logo
SAP Data Quality Management vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Compared 9% of the time
More Informatica Cloud Data Quality Competitors
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management
Compared 19% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management
Compared 13% of the time
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management
Compared 13% of the time
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs SAS Data Management Logo
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs SAS Data Management
Compared 9% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management
Compared 8% of the time
More SAS Data Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Informatica Cloud Data Quality
August 2025
Informatica Cloud Data Quality reportDownload Informatica Cloud Data Quality product report
Buyer's Guide
SAS Data Management
July 2025
SAS Data Management reportDownload SAS Data Management product report
 

Also Known As

Cloud Data Quality Radar
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
 

Overview

Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar is a cloud application that quickly identifies, fixes, and monitors data quality problems in your business applications—wherever they are, in the cloud or on-premise.

This easy-to-use, browser-based tool empowers line-of-business managers to take ownership of the data quality process so business can maximize the return on trusted data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar enables you to quickly assess the strengths and weaknesses in your data, to track improvements in the data over time, and to calculate data quality scores for objects and field entities with the flexibility to filter and drill down on specific records for better detection of problems.

Informatica

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Freddie Mac, Rabobank
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Buyer's Guide
Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management
July 2025
Free Report: Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.