Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs SAS Data Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Organizations benefited from data trustworthiness and customer satisfaction using Informatica Cloud Data Quality, despite noted stability issues and slower ROI.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAS Data Management improves data accuracy and reliability, aiding cost efficiency and reporting, crucial in the pharmaceutical industry.
Compared to Collibra Catalog, where the value is noticeable within six months.
The stability and performance remain issues.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Informatica Cloud Data Quality support is effective yet faces issues with response times and inconsistency, with areas for improvement.
Sentiment score
7.1
SAS Data Management customer service is generally reliable but mixed, with efficient technical support and room for improvement.
The support is not very good; each ticket starts from scratch as there is no continuity between personnel handling the same ticket.
Even after going out of service support, they still reached back to me whenever I raised tickets.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Informatica Cloud Data Quality is scalable and adaptable, efficiently handling large data sets for enterprise-level growth.
Sentiment score
7.3
SAS Data Management is scalable, supporting enterprises globally with adaptable performance, seamless integration, and efficient complex data handling.
I have used the product over multiple systems and was able to write reports for large data sets without any performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Informatica Cloud Data Quality is stable but experiences update-related issues and disruptions, needing further maturation according to users.
Sentiment score
7.6
SAS Data Management is reliable and efficient, with server stability on Linux, but Windows client may require restarts.
There are substantial stability issues with Informatica Cloud Data Quality on the cloud.
I find the stability to be good, with occasional restarts required every two to three months due to glitches.
 

Room For Improvement

Informatica Cloud Data Quality requires improvements in spatial data handling, user interface, automation, dashboard functionality, and cost efficiency.
SAS Data Management requires improved cost efficiency, flexibility, user interface, cloud capabilities, integration, accessibility, and training resources.
The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches.
This creates a significant cost and time burden, especially since we followed a strict software development life cycle process, which made creating each rule time-consuming and expensive.
It is not stable, and there are several issues, especially on the cloud side, unlike the on-premise version which was very stable.
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
 

Setup Cost

Informatica Cloud Data Quality is costly, with users preferring flexible pricing over fixed tier-based licensing models.
SAS Data Management is expensive but provides high value, with more affordable solutions integrating multiple functions for data management.
The pricing for Informatica Cloud Data Quality is super expensive.
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
 

Valuable Features

Informatica Cloud Data Quality offers comprehensive data management and cleansing with seamless integration, AI-driven rule creation, and cloud access.
SAS Data Management provides seamless integration, quality, and governance with a user-friendly interface and robust transformation capabilities.
We could run data quality rules as part of Service Bus, which ensured the integrity of customer information before it was entered into our database.
The quality of the data improves with Informatica Cloud Data Quality.
The out-of-the-box features and standard profiling options provide quick visibility of the data within minutes.
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Cloud Data Quality
Ranking in Data Quality
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Data Management
Ranking in Data Quality
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (35th), Data Governance (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is 8.4%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 2.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

TaherDungrawala - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good reusability and CDI features
I use Collibra Data Quality. I switched to Informatica because Collibra cannot integrate. Colibra Cloud Data Quality is a very basic tool. There is no integration capability. If you have problem records, there is no fix to remediate them using the same tool. With Informatica, you can integrate with CDI and then create a remediation plan.
Vivek Trivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features
The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.
What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
Informatica Cloud Data Quality has significant room for improvement. It is not stable, and there are several issues, especially on the cloud side, unlike the on-premise version which was very stabl...
What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
We use Informatica Cloud Data Quality ( /products/informatica-cloud-data-quality-reviews ) in a medium business environment.
What do you like most about SAS Data Management?
I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?
The licensing model for vCenter is a perpetual license with yearly payments. This model ensures continuous updates and support while managing initial setup costs.
What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?
Integration and cloud migration are areas where we see potential for improvement. A more seamless integration process and transitioning to a cloud-based environment would enhance user-friendliness ...
 

Also Known As

Cloud Data Quality Radar
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Freddie Mac, Rabobank
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.