Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs SAP Information Steward comparison

Informatica and SAP are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Informatica is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Informatica holds a 6.6% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAP’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Informatica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Read 17 Informatica Cloud Data Quality reviews

951 Views
941 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

SAP Information Steward

Read 9 SAP Information Steward reviews

849 Views
509 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

SAP Information Steward

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Informatica Cloud Data Quality and SAP Information Steward compete in the data quality management category. Informatica stands out for ease of deployment, while SAP Information Steward offers superior feature sets catering to functionality-focused users.

Features: Informatica Cloud Data Quality offers robust integration with various cloud platforms, enabling versatile data handling. It includes strong data validation features, making it suitable for dynamic business needs. Another valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, simplifying operations and eliminating the need for server maintenance. SAP Information Steward excels with extensive data profiling that facilitates in-depth analysis and governance. Its metadata management capabilities streamline complex data processes. It seamlessly integrates with SAP environments, providing higher accuracy through validation against reference tools.

Room for Improvement: Informatica Cloud Data Quality could enhance its documentation and provide more intuitive navigation within the interface to improve user experience. Additional advanced data security features would appeal to privacy-focused users. Finally, expanding integration APIs could improve adaptability. SAP Information Steward could benefit from a simpler deployment process to reduce initial setup complexity for clients. Enhanced real-time data processing features might improve responsiveness. Better clarity in field naming within SAP tables would help users understand data context more easily.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica Cloud Data Quality offers simple, flexible cloud-based deployment that streamlines setup. Its customer service is known for being responsive and efficient, aiding smooth implementation. SAP Information Steward's on-premise deployment is more complex, requiring detailed planning and resources, but it compensates with robust customer services offering extensive training resources, supporting comprehensive onboarding for users.

Pricing and ROI: Informatica Cloud Data Quality provides competitive pricing models with quicker ROI due to its efficient setup and operations in the cloud. Its pricing details are typically customized based on client needs. SAP Information Steward's pricing is higher at setup due to extensive capabilities. It offers substantial long-term value and ROI that appeals to businesses with comprehensive data management requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Ranking in Data Quality

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Information Steward

Ranking in Data Quality

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is 6.6%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 3.2%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

Mehmet SukruKaya

Senior Data Analytics Manager at Esan

Improved data quality significantly enhances project efficiency and effectiveness

I am not utilizing the data quality rules management part yet. We had a bad experience before Informatica Cloud Data Quality. We started a data analytics project that took more than three months of wasted time because we couldn't use the data to create the optimization model. If we have an application like Informatica Cloud Data Quality or a data quality platform, we can finish the project in less than three months. This is the on-prem data that we ingested. We don't use any cloud data that we have. For now, we are just using the on-prem data, and we don't have any integration from the data outside of the on-prem. I would recommend it to other users. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 9.

Read full review

FranciscoSantos

Director at Pixel Studio PTY

Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool

For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the rule specification."

"Initial setup was fairly easy."

"One of the most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Quality is Master Data Management. You can write code to build your logic rules to check the quality."

"The quality of the data improves with Informatica Cloud Data Quality."

"I would definitely recommend Informatica Data Quality to others."

"The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The out-of-the-box features and standard profiling options provide quick visibility of the data within minutes, which facilitates discussions with the business."

More Informatica Cloud Data Quality pros

"The Data Cleansing and the scorecard dashboard are very valuable. Additionally, the financial aspect of SAP Information Steward is very good. When a rule is incorrect then it will show how much is it costing the business. These features are very valuable."

"Data insight is the most valuable feature."

"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."

"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."

"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"Setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."

More SAP Information Steward pros

Cons

"In certain domains, I am looking for material-level match features that are not customizable. The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches."

"Informatica Cloud Data Quality has significant room for improvement. It is not stable, and there are several issues, especially on the cloud side, unlike the on-premise version which was very stable."

"In the on-premises version, features like web service consumer and web service provider are available, but these functionalities are currently unavailable in the cloud edition."

"I definitely will not recommend Informatica Cloud Data Quality because it's very hard to manage the licensing model and the price is very high."

"Informatica Cloud Data Quality could improve by adding more algorithms for matching and mastering. We currently only have five or six. Additionally, the parallelism in data is better in other solutions, such as IBM."

"Support response time could be better."

"The integration with older technology and cloud quality needs improvement."

"You cannot import the data discovery rules you create in the solution to the Cloud Data Governance and Catalog (CDGC)."

More Informatica Cloud Data Quality cons

"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."

"SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."

"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."

"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."

"Performance could be improved."

"Needs to be more powerful on rules."

"The solution could improve by incorporating other applications, such as Power BI to show more visualization. More interaction with other solutions would be a good benefit."

More SAP Information Steward cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high."

"Informatica Cloud Data Quality is a costly solution."

"We pay for a yearly subscription."

"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

21%

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?

The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?

I think it would be very useful to have the same features on the data center version available on the cloud version. I remember when I used it, there was some limitation in one of the data quality ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?

I worked on a project where we had to use these tools to execute the data quality requirements from assessment perspectives to scorecards and similar tasks. I haven't used any other tools, so I can...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Compared 62% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Compared 9% of the time

More Informatica Cloud Data Quality Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 25% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 19% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 18% of the time

Syniti Information Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 12% of the time

More SAP Information Steward Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

August 2025

Download Informatica Cloud Data Quality product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Information Steward

July 2025

Download SAP Information Steward product report

Also Known As

Cloud Data Quality Radar

Information Steward, SAP Data Insight

Overview

Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar is a cloud application that quickly identifies, fixes, and monitors data quality problems in your business applications—wherever they are, in the cloud or on-premise.

This easy-to-use, browser-based tool empowers line-of-business managers to take ownership of the data quality process so business can maximize the return on trusted data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar enables you to quickly assess the strengths and weaknesses in your data, to track improvements in the data over time, and to calculate data quality scores for objects and field entities with the flexibility to filter and drill down on specific records for better detection of problems.

Informatica

Monitor, analyze, and improve data integrity with SAP Information Steward software. Combine data profiling and metadata management tools for continuous insight into the quality of enterprise information to optimize processes, and enhance operational, analytical, and data governance initiatives.

SAP

Sample Customers

Freddie Mac, Rabobank

American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated

Buyer's Guide

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward

July 2025

Free Report: Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs. SAP Information Steward report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.