InfluxDB vs Netrounds comparison

InfluxData and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfluxData is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while Juniper is ranked #96. InfluxData holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 19 InfluxDB reviews

3,696 Views
739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netrounds

Read 3 Netrounds reviews

783 Views
650 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Netrounds

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Netrounds and InfluxDB operate in the network testing and data storage category, respectively. Netrounds has the upper hand in network performance and uptime, while InfluxDB stands out in data analytics and time-series data handling.

Features:Netrounds offers real-time network performance analytics, automated testing, and integration with multiple network environments. InfluxDB provides a powerful time-series database, flexible querying capabilities, and advanced data analytics.

Room for Improvement:Netrounds could improve by expanding its time-series data handling, providing more advanced analytics options, and enhancing its data visualization capabilities. InfluxDB could improve by offering a simpler deployment process, enhancing its network integration features, and providing more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Netrounds offers straightforward deployment with strong customer support, suitable for network administrators. InfluxDB, with its technical deployment, comes with comprehensive resources, requiring more expertise but offering robust service.

Pricing and ROI:Netrounds provides a value-driven model focused on network KPIs, ideal for cost-sensitive network-focused projects. InfluxDB offers competitive pricing for data storage and analytics, providing scalable solutions with long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Netrounds Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Netrounds

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (16th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Netrounds

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

96th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netrounds is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.3%
Netrounds	0.4%
Other	99.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

it_user738366

Head of Network Operations at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Fast and easy notification of problems on the network

Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings. This product gives us a good historical overview over the network and quick alarms for problems Fast and easy notification of problems on the network. The web GUI Grouping of jobs Making your own dashboards…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"InfluxDB has positively impacted Energy Box by being the best choice for our needs."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"I recommend going with the cloud version of InfluxDB, as it's very cheap and effective."

"Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."

"Because of reduced downtime, we benefit greatly from receiving alerts in advance."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

More InfluxDB pros

"Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings."

"The live packet capture feature enables quicker troubleshooting and better network monitoring."

Cons

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."

"If it gets a little bit more into the metric side, then it would really be great, similar to Prometheus."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"The solution's UI can be more user-friendly."

More InfluxDB cons

"The web interface is ok, but I would like to see if it was possible to group jobs better and to create our own dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

One thing I appreciate about InfluxDB is its balance between performance and ease of use, especially with Flux making complex queries accessible. However, I do wish the documentation and community ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB has been mostly for monitoring and analyzing the time-series data related to system metrics, and also tracking logs and API performance. In my current role, I use it t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Netrounds

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Netrounds

Compared 15% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Netrounds

Compared 13% of the time

Colasoft nChronos vs Netrounds

Compared 12% of the time

LinkSprinter vs Netrounds

Compared 9% of the time

More Netrounds Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

March 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download Netrounds product report

Overview

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Netrounds is a programmable test and service assurance solution using software-based and traffic-generating probes, easily used and delivered from the cloud as a SaaS solution or deployed on-premise in NFV environments.

Juniper

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Telenor, Sappa, Clas Ohlson, Netnordic, Kabelnoord, Lunet

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Netrounds

March 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Netrounds

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Netrounds and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Netrounds report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.