


SUSE Manager and Infisical are competitors in the IT management and security space. SUSE Manager appears to have the upper hand in system lifecycle management and pricing, while Infisical leads with advanced security features and user-friendliness.
Features: SUSE Manager offers configuration management, patch management, and streamlined operations. Infisical provides advanced security capabilities, data protection, and compliance assurance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SUSE Manager benefits from a straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service. Infisical offers comprehensive support despite a more complex deployment process.
Pricing and ROI: SUSE Manager has competitive pricing and good ROI with resource optimization. Infisical, although more costly upfront, provides high ROI where data security is crucial.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
With Microsoft Intune, tasks such as device provisioning, policy deployment, application delivery, and compliance enforcement require less manual effort than in more traditional management models.
Developers spend less time requesting, sharing, and troubleshooting environment secrets because everything is centrally managed with controlled access.
The manual process took us around ten minutes, but with Infisical, it cut down to almost two minutes.
The most important return on investment would be the time saved and the seamless integration.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
The documentation and available resources have been very useful for resolving common issues independently.
I use the documentation available on GitHub and their website for Infisical.
Generally, the support is good, but there are instances where the support team seems disinterested in solving complex problems.
They are responsive and technically knowledgeable, providing clear documentation and troubleshooting steps in most cases.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
As our usage grows, areas such as advanced automation, deep integration, and more granular governance capabilities will become increasingly important, but overall, Infisical provides a solid foundation for scaling secret management.
Infisical has high scalability because it has the possibility of integrating into the cluster and offers a self-hosted solution.
It is really very scalable and easy to implement in varied teams.
I can manage a growing number of Linux systems by adding SUSE Manager Proxies for remote sites and distributing the workload effectively.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
In my experience, Microsoft Intune is a stable platform as it is a cloud-based service, and updates are regularly delivered by Microsoft.
The main reliability benefit is that it provides a centralized and predictable way to access secrets rather than relying on manually maintained configuration files or shared credentials.
Mostly, the issue was on the Infisical side rather than on our cloud side because everything was working perfectly fine.
Infisical is quite stable in my experience, and there have been no downtime or reliability issues encountered.
It has proven reliable in day-to-day operations, and once it is configured correctly, client communication, patching, repositories, and Salt automation work very well in production.
The stability of SUSE Manager is fine.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
I faced many permission issues, so I had to go back and forth with my founder to get all the permissions required for building the CI/CD pipeline and injecting the tokens into it.
Improving documentation with more real-world examples for different architectures such as AWS Lambda and Kubernetes, .NET applications, and multi-account cloud setups would help teams adapt best practices faster.
If a file or a secret is needed, the agent might generate it for us based on a specified pattern for the kind of secrets we want, including the length.
A better description of the initial setup process could enhance user experience.
Features that can be helpful in disaster recovery.
Additionally, the official documentation is not comprehensive enough; many commands are missing, and it could benefit from screenshots to help with installation, such as adding clients.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
Even using the free version, it fits perfectly for small solutions for small companies.
The main value comes from reducing the operational effort around managing secrets, improving security practices, and making deployments more consistent.
My experience with Infisical's pricing, configuration costs, and licensing is that initially, people thought it was a bit expensive, which is why we opted for the self-hosted alternative.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
Infisical helped tremendously by dynamically injecting all the tokens and secrets into the workflow, which was very fast and saved a lot of time.
Everybody can access it seamlessly since it is a central hub with separate access controls.
You can configure solid RBAC for access to Infisical and you have the possibility of granularizing the secrets themselves through folders, allowing for more organized configuration.
It supports more than six or seven Linux flavors, and when compared to other tools such as Satellite, which only supports the Red Hat operating system, SUSE Manager supports Red Hat, Ubuntu, Debian, and some other Linux operating systems for patch management.
Patch management has significantly saved me time. Instead of logging into each Linux server individually, I schedule updates from my SUSE Manager dashboard for multiple systems at once.
SUSE Manager is valuable for managing systems, patching, and utilizing SaltStack connectivity for various installations and other routines.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 4.6% |
| SUSE Manager | 2.7% |
| Infisical | 0.6% |
| Other | 92.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 192 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 62 |
| Large Enterprise | 186 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.
Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.
Infisical provides a comprehensive solution for managing secret keys and sensitive data, streamlining security processes for businesses. Designed for efficiency, Infisical ensures the protection of data and facilitates better data management workflows.
Infisical caters to businesses aiming to secure their sensitive information by offering a robust infrastructure for managing encryption keys and secret data. The system integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, providing specialized security features designed to enhance data integrity and access management for technical teams. With Infisical, companies can be assured of a reliable, secure environment for their critical data needs, eliminating the complexities often associated with secret management.
What are some key features of Infisical?Infisical is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data security is paramount. Implementing Infisical in these sectors enables companies to meet stringent compliance requirements while maintaining seamless operations. Technical teams value Infisical for its reliability and ease of implementation, which minimizes disruption during integration, making it an asset for data-centric environments.
SUSE Manager offers centralized patch deployment, live patching, and embedded monitoring for Linux systems. With support for multiple Linux versions, it automates patch management and compliance, optimizing costs and enhancing system security.
Designed to simplify server management, SUSE Manager features a web-based interface that alerts users to potential vulnerabilities. It integrates with SaltStack and supports DevOps workflows, accommodating multiple Linux distributions like Red Hat, CentOS, SLES, and Ubuntu. While providing automated OS deployment, auditing, and configuration management, it lacks predictive AI and error detection tools. Users often rely on SUSE Manager for tasks within SAP HANA environments, database housekeeping, and integration with OneView and Synergy. Despite its capabilities, users cite a need for improved integration with tools like Jira and enhanced documentation to assist newcomers. It also requires enhancements in its library of VCPs and playbooks.
What are the key features of SUSE Manager?In industries managing diverse IT environments, SUSE Manager ensures efficient patch management and compliance. Healthcare, finance, and tech sectors leverage its automation capabilities for tasks like SAP HANA management and integration with OneView and Synergy. Despite requiring expertise, it provides robust solutions for complex server infrastructures.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.