We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"Technical support was very helpful."
"Integration with IBM AS/400 and Db2 is okay."
"Real-time monitoring is also a great tool, as you may watch several parameters in real time."
"An improvement has been to our website: It increases the speed of our response, the capacity of the site, and optimizes the bandwidth."
"It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"Simplifies putting everything in code."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
"Analytics in the area of risk need to be improved to supply more information to the users for creating better environments."
"Its price could be improved. It is quite expensive. It will be good if we could export the configuration. Currently, to control the configuration, we need to go to each website, which is not very convenient."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"The solution should integrate with something that looks at continuous security management."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Imperva DDoS is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences).
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.