IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

IBM and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #60, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

554 Views
515 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 57 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

5,348 Views
3,262 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Splunk Observability Cloud are competing in the observability and IT management domain. Based on comparisons, Splunk Observability Cloud has the upper hand due to its superior features that justify its cost.

Features: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager provides monitoring and diagnostic capabilities crucial for enterprise environments, infrastructure management, and integration with IBM solutions. Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and effectiveness for cloud environments and microservices architectures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud provides a cloud-native deployment model with quick integration and comprehensive customer service. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager may require more effort for deployment and integration but benefits from IBM support for enterprise-level businesses.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a lower initial setup cost, emphasizing ROI for IBM-invested businesses. Splunk Observability Cloud, though higher in setup costs, offers significant long-term ROI through its feature-rich platform, enhancing cloud operations and real-time analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

60th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The features are pretty much ready out of the box."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."

"Great monitoring of network devices."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reduces our mean time to resolve. We are more proactive than reactive."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to get information about all of the security measurements in my environment."

"The most beneficial aspect of Splunk APM is the ATM, which is the map displaying the inbound and outbound relationships of the microservices, as well as the traffic between these dependencies. This feature provides us with valuable insights and helps us understand the interactions between different microservices."

"The alerts are the most valuable feature."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

"The cardinality is pretty low."

"Splunk's functionality could be improved by adding database connectors for other platforms like AWS and Azure."

"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."

"I would rate Splunk technical support at six out of ten. When we have a problem and need to create a case, the response isn't quick."

"The implementation can be more user-friendly."

"This solution is difficult to configure and the instructions are complex."

"The deployment can be quite complex."

"Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms. These categories of dashboards would be very helpful for customers."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Splunk can be expensive, as its licensing is based on the daily data ingestion volume."

"It is expensive."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 32% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 12% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.