Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT vs Quest On Demand Licence Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Quest On Demand Licence Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two License Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT vs. Quest On Demand Licence Management report (Updated: September 2022).
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
8th
out of 27 in License Management
Views
565
Comparisons
487
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 27 in License Management
Views
88
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
License Management
September 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS, BMC, ManageEngine and others in License Management. Updated: September 2022.
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Tivoli Asset Management for IT
Learn More
Overview
IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is designed to help track and manage your hardware and software IT assets, with particular emphasis on inventory, asset life-cycle management, and license management. Asset Management for IT includes inventory, asset tracking, asset reconciliation, financial management, contract management, procurement management, and, optionally, Service Level Agreement (SLA) management. This asset life-cycle functionality permits the tracking and management of IT assets through initial request, approval, procurement, contract, receipt, inventory, deployment, asset installs-moves-adds-changes (IMACs), and retirement.

IT administrators are responsible for managing users' Office 365 licenses including assigning and configuring Office 365 and Azure AD licenses for new employees, cancelling or transferring existing licenses when employees leave the company, and reassigning unassigned licenses to other users. Office 365 license management is a crucial role that ensures the optimum number of licenses are available to support your business today and into the future. Equally important, it ensures that you aren't spending valuable IT budget on more licenses than you really need. Quest® On Demand License Management provides visibility into Microsoft Office 365 licenses and the reporting capabilities needed to help IT administrators achieve optimal license utilization.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT
Learn more about Quest On Demand Licence Management
Sample Customers
Migros Zurich, Tyr_ns AB, Port Otago Limited, BTC, Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., AIG, Swedish Match, DTE Energy
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government12%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise70%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
License Management
September 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS, BMC, ManageEngine and others in License Management. Updated: September 2022.
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 8th in License Management while Quest On Demand Licence Management is ranked 23rd in License Management. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 0.0, while Quest On Demand Licence Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with BigFix, ServiceNow, BMC Helix Discovery and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, whereas Quest On Demand Licence Management is most compared with .

See our list of best License Management vendors.

We monitor all License Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.