IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) and Nagios Core are competitors in the network performance management category. While IBM SevOne NPM appears to have the upper hand in terms of comprehensive visibility and customer service, Nagios Core offers significant flexibility and cost-effectiveness due to its open-source nature.
Features: IBM SevOne NPM provides extensive infrastructure visibility, fast data reporting, real-time metrics, and can monitor millions of objects with ease in alert settings. Its scalability and stability make it a robust choice for large networks. Nagios Core is recognized for its flexibility, customization, and large number of available plugins. Its open-source model allows for a wide range of free modules, making it highly adaptable to various monitoring needs.
Room for Improvement: IBM SevOne NPM could enhance its baselining, visualization, and integration for a better user experience. Improving data migration in upgrades and expanding telemetry and cloud monitoring support are areas for growth. Nagios Core's user interface could be modernized with easier setup processes and cloud hosting capabilities. Simplifying configuration and enhancing reporting could make it more user-friendly for less technically skilled users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SevOne NPM is flexible, available on-premises and in hybrid cloud environments, offering high-quality customer service and technical support through various channels. Nagios Core, mainly for on-premises use, is praised for its open-source model with no licensing fees. However, deployment requires significant expertise, and while customer service is not comprehensive, it benefits from a strong community for support.
Pricing and ROI: IBM SevOne NPM comes with a flexible pricing model based on network elements, allowing scalability with business growth. Although it is more expensive upfront, it offers strong ROI by reducing downtime and operational costs. Nagios Core is cost-effective due to its free, open-source nature but may incur higher operational costs due to the need for technical expertise in customization and support. Businesses often justify SevOne's cost for its advanced capabilities and support, while Nagios offers cost savings in licensing but potentially lacks explicit ROI.
The technical support from IBM for SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is very good.
It is suitable for small, medium, and enterprise-level companies.
The solution is scalable.
The stability of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) is excellent.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
It would be beneficial to have out-of-the-box integration with third-party vendors and improvements in correlation features.
The most valuable features of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) are its stability, usability, visibility, and user-friendly interface.
You can monitor anything.
The IBM® SevOne Network Performance Management (IBM SevOne NPM) solution helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics from a single source. Boost network performance and improve your user application experience by proactively monitoring your multivendor end-to-end network across enterprise, communication, and managed service provider networks.
Transform raw network performance data into intelligent and actionable insights. The IBM SevOne NPM solution goes beyond detection, combining industry-leading expertise and advanced technology to help your IT team plan and optimize your network and act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional customer experience.
For further information, please visit www.ibm.com/cloud/sevo...
This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
