We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."We run 65 servers globally with just two people: an engineering person and me."
"The most valuable features are log monitoring, easy-to-fix issues, and problem-solving."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years."
"The most valuable features are the AI assistant, which is good at detecting known types of behavior."
"It'll get you from point A to B."
"This is a good tool to have because it gives you the ability to track what is currently happening in your environment."
"QRadar has somewhat of a new structure recently from last gen. They have moved from the standard UI based infrastructure."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"Each module requires a separate license and a separate cost."
"It would be good if the program allowed certain profiles to only see certain customer information."
"The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface."
"In terms of additional features, a mobile app would be nice. Also, the reporting is definitely okay, but you have to make sure that everybody with different roles can understand it. There is room for improvement in the reporting."
"The solution is clunky."
"There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"QRadar's performance has room for improvement because it cannot handle the volume. I need massive amounts of logs from various devices in our existing network architecture. IBM needs to improve QRadar's capacity to handle more logs."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.