IBM Open Liberty vs Oracle Application Server comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Server category. IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 10.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. IBM holds a 3.8% mindshare in AppS, compared to Oracle’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 2 IBM Open Liberty reviews

1,939 Views
252 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Server

Read 2 Oracle Application Server reviews

675 Views
675 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Oracle Application Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

Oracle Application Server and IBM Open Liberty compete in the application server space. IBM Open Liberty appears to have the upper hand in terms of modern architectural integration and flexibility for cloud-native applications.

Features: Oracle Application Server provides enterprise-grade integration capabilities, extensive security configurations, and a full-suite traditional solution. IBM Open Liberty offers a modular architecture that supports microservices environments, cloud compatibility, and tailored deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Open Liberty's lightweight nature allows for simpler deployment and quicker integration into systems with superior cloud adaptability. Its customer service is focused on modern application requirements. Oracle Application Server has a more complex deployment process, requiring extensive configuration. Customer support is extensive but traditional.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Server involves higher initial setup costs, offering ROI in large enterprises with its powerful tools. IBM Open Liberty generally offers a more economical setup, delivering solid ROI for projects prioritizing modern application development and cloud integration.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Ranking in Application Server

8th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Server

Ranking in Application Server

7th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of IBM Open Liberty is 3.8%. The mindshare of Oracle Application Server is 4.0%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Application Server	4.0%
IBM Open Liberty	3.8%
Other	92.2%

Application Server

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Partner at SouJava

Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates

The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.

Read full review

Sony Kurian

Director at GNX Solutions

Quick deployment and easy implementation with complex logic challenges

We use Oracle Application Server for a loan management system. We created it for a client; it is a low-code platform. Everything is purchased in Oracle Cloud, and we use it to develop and deploy applications The product offers easy implementation, which is a benefit. It saves development time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."

"The product offers easy implementation, which is a benefit. It saves development time compared to normal development processes."

Cons

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"If you have complex business logic, there is no option to build that complex logic inside the platform."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

51%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?

To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Application Server?

The pricing model is costly. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it around four to five. Compared to other solutions like Mendix, Oracle Application Server is more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Application Server?

If you have complex business logic, there is no option to build that complex logic inside the platform. You have to use third-party tools. If Oracle could provide an inbuilt feature for complex log...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Application Server?

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 67% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 9% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

Helidon vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Oracle Application Server

Compared 34% of the time

IIS vs Oracle Application Server

Compared 22% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Oracle Application Server

Compared 12% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle Application Server

Compared 11% of the time

Tomcat vs Oracle Application Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

January 2026

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

January 2026

Download Oracle Application Server product report

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Oracle Application Server provides a single integrated packaged solution of for middleware infrastructure including Oracle Containers for J2EE, Oracle Web Cache, Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Forms, Oracle Reports, Oracle Portal and Oracle Discoverer. Also included in this infrastructure are integrated security, management and integration technologies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Abu Dhabi National Oil Company Distribution

Buyer's Guide

IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,927 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Application Server report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.