IBM Event Streams vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

IBM and Salesforce are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM holds a 1.1% mindshare in MQ, compared to Salesforce’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

IBM Event Streams

Read 3 IBM Event Streams reviews

380 Views
209 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 59 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

11,013 Views
1,982 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Event Streams

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and IBM Event Streams are in the integration solutions category. MuleSoft tends to stand out with its robust integration capabilities, while IBM Event Streams shines in real-time data processing and messaging features.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers comprehensive API design and management, seamless connectivity across systems, and robust integration tools. IBM Event Streams is designed for sophisticated event-driven architecture, high throughput capabilities, and efficient data streaming, focusing on environments that benefit from enhanced analytics and real-time processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is noted for its straightforward deployment and proactive customer support. IBM Event Streams, although featuring a complex setup, provides robust analytics and a responsive support team that caters well to experienced users needing customization options. MuleSoft's simpler setup appeals to businesses looking for rapid integrations.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, with a higher upfront cost, often delivers significant ROI by streamlining operations across systems. IBM Event Streams offers an affordable entry, with ROI linked to effective real-time data processing. MuleSoft's comprehensive offering justifies its expense, while IBM Event Streams attracts cost-sensitive buyers needing strong streaming features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Event Streams

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of IBM Event Streams is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 8.6%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	8.6%
IBM Event Streams	1.1%
Other	90.3%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Ismail El-Dahshan

CEO at areebah

Easy to set up with good support and good routing scenarios

The triggering and the events that they have triggered as well as the route of the message according to the events are very useful. The triggering scenarios and routing scenarios are all good. It's a very useful solution for financial institutions. The initial setup is pretty straightforward. The stability has been good. I've found the product to be scalable. Technical support is responsive.

Read full review

Mohan BS

Senior Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A useful tool to integrate applications and for data transformations that need to improve in the area of price and support

The main area where improvements are required in the product revolves around budgeting. The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle. Mule Anypoint Platform is made available with many components, and whether users use them or not depends on their choices. For example, though there is a tool called Anypoint MQ, our organization prefers to pay and use Kafka, as we don't want to use MuleSoft Anypoint MQ. In Mule Anypoint Platform, there needs to be proper segregation to help users identify what they need and don't need, making it an area where users need to be careful when opting for MuleSoft. Mule Anypoint Platform is an integration tool and not an ETL solution. When a user has to deal with a huge number of data, then Mule Anypoint Platform should not be a preferred choice since it can only be used for lightweight purposes revolving around APIs. There is a need to have a clear architectural decision made before opting for Mule Anypoint Platform. When there is a requirement for heavy data transformation, then users need to decide whether to go with Mule Anypoint Platform or any other platform available in the market. Though the tool comes with many useful components, it depends on whether the user plans to use all of its features. Recently, the product has come up with a new feature that is similar to an API catalog. MuleSoft had come up with the UAPIM feature almost eight months to a year ago, which had some concerns in the area of budgeting. Whether you build APIs using Javacore or any other tools, they can be cataloged using MuleSoft's UAPIM feature, for which users need to pay an extra amount, making it an area of concern for users. It would be great if MuleSoft's support team could provide help with the area of Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm an administrator, and what I like most is the interface, the security, and the storage."

"The stability has been good."

"The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality."

"Initially, we faced challenges managing numerous scheduled jobs and duplicate entries in our SAP system. To address this, we developed a reusable component in Mule that all applications could use to interact with SAP."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."

"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"It reduces manual loads in maintaining servers as it comes with the Cloud Hub feature."

"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."

"The tool’s API management capabilities are excellent."

"The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

Cons

"In the next release, I would like to see the GUI allow you to configure the security section."

"It would be helpful if they could help us explain why they, as in, the customers, should use the product and the overall benefits."

"The product's interface needs improvement."

"There are so many solutions like this, but this is not as mature as those products. The other MQ products have the capability of reprocessing and maintaining the persistence of the data. They can handle large volumes and large messages, but Anypoint MQ doesn't have those capabilities."

"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."

"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."

"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."

"It's extremely expensive to change things in Anypoint MQ. There's also this issue of slow output of messages, and that needs to be improved."

"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."

"In MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, there is a disadvantage because users need substantial technical understanding, which creates a barrier for citizen developers."

"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing needs to be improved."

"The platform is averagely priced."

"The pricing of our solution is highly competitive. While it may not be categorized as exceptionally low, it is certainly more affordable compared to IBM."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

"The solution has a high price."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The product is still very expensive."

"Making changes in Anypoint MQ is expensive."

"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Event Streams?

The system efficiently processes and calculates the data flow within the cluster using DLP functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Event Streams?

The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Event Streams?

The product's interface needs improvement. Additionally, there could be a management console to create and manage clusters.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Kafka vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 40% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 38% of the time

IBM MQ vs IBM Event Streams

Compared 22% of the time

More IBM Event Streams Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 8% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

October 2025

Download IBM Event Streams product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Overview

Built on open source Apache Kafka, IBM Event Streams is an event-streaming platform that helps you build smart applications that can react to events as they happen. IBM Event Streams is based on years of operational expertise IBM has gained from running Apache Kafka event streams for enterprises

IBM

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

API Management: Comprehensive tools for managing APIs effectively.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates diverse integration patterns.
Connectors: Extensive library for connecting various systems.
Observability: Enhances monitoring and performance tracking.
Batch Processing: Manages large volumes of data efficiently.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing data demands across platforms.
Performance: Simplifies complex deployments and improves processing.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments, from cloud to on-premises.
User-Friendly: Streamlines integration processes with robust tools.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

American Airlines, UBank, Bitly, Eurobits, Active International, Bison, Contextor, Constance Hotels, Resorts & Golf, Creval, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, FaceMe, FacePhi, Fitzsoft, Fuga Technologies, Guardio, Honeywell, Japanese airline, Jenzabar, KONE

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

September 2025

Free Report: IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Event Streams vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.