IBM ECM vs OpenText Content Management comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. IBM holds a 2.4% mindshare in ECM, compared to OpenText’s 10.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM ECM

Read 17 IBM ECM reviews

743 Views
713 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Management

Read 22 OpenText Content Management reviews

3,437 Views
3,025 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM ECM

OpenText Content Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

IBM ECM and OpenText Content Management are competing in the enterprise content management space. IBM ECM holds an advantage due to its integration capabilities, though OpenText is favorable for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: IBM ECM is known for its robust security features, integration options, and scalability in handling large volumes of documents. OpenText Content Management provides advanced document management, workflow automation, and powerful search capabilities that enhance operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: IBM ECM could benefit from simplifying its interface to reduce the learning curve and enhancing workflow capabilities. OpenText Content Management may improve by offering more streamlined integration processes, reducing the initial setup complexity, and expanding customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ECM offers a seamless deployment process with strong support, streamlining integration in complex IT environments. On the other hand, OpenText Content Management provides flexible deployment tailored to diverse needs, though it may require a more involved initial setup. OpenText is noted for personalized assistance and tailor-made support services.

Pricing and ROI: IBM ECM has a higher initial setup cost but offers substantial ROI through efficiency in integrations. OpenText Content Management presents a competitive pricing model focused on flexible solutions and long-term value, delivering excellent ROI via its versatile offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM ECM

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of IBM ECM is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Management is 10.1%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Content Management	10.1%
IBM ECM	2.4%
Other	87.5%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Thinh Tran

BPM Consultant at TECHCOMBANK

Has supported enterprise document storage but lacks cloud readiness and AI capabilities

The new version of IBM ECM is at the end of support, and we need to migrate to a new version to get open support. We need AI capabilities from IBM ECM for additional functionalities in the next release. Specifically, AI is needed for finding documents. The trend is moving toward AI, and for managing many documents effectively, we need AI capabilities. Currently, IBM ECM only handles physical files, not unstructured files. IBM needs to work alongside customers and share best practices for IBM ECM. Reading the IBM Redbook alone is not sufficient for the knowledge we need to build the best architecture for my company. IBM ECM needs to improve the cloud version, such as compatibility with Amazon Cloud, not only IBM Cloud, to make their product more competitive.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Enables effective document control yet requires better affordability and clarity

I use extended ECM for procurement, sales, engineering documents, and sometimes invoices and accounts payable or receivable The version controls and the business workspace part integrate well with SAP and OpenText, providing granular level control over who accesses the workspace. The seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability is a valuable feature, that we're able to display our documents to so many people."

"The content management is all about you as you can make the same content for minimal purpose solutions applications."

"The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, etc."

"The vertical scalability, as we can use it across some of our applications."

"I am going to continue using it because it is a good product for enterprise document management."

"The engineering document management system is one of the most valuable features."

"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."

"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."

"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."

"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."

"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."

"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."

"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."

Cons

"Currently, IBM ECM only handles physical files, not unstructured files."

"I would like to see seamless application integration."

"I think it's already getting away from Java applets. A lot of our users struggle with keeping up to date with Java versioning, so a lot of the functions they're doing, like printing, emailing, and even some of the viewing, they're struggling with."

"The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days."

"I would recommend not going with ECM 8 and going with FileNet instead. It seems like that is the future of the lower-volume repository. It seems like they are moving away from ECM 8.5 so I think we're going to have some challenges coming up, getting off of that technology."

"Initially there can be stability issues due to unknown factors such as usage of the system, quantity of documents ingested, load during peak hours."

"The response time is not effective, and the staff lacks adequate knowledge."

"We had some issues with scalability in the production. So, I would rate it a five out of ten."

"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."

"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."

"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."

"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."

"The solution should work better with partners and be more developer-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Reach out to local IBM partners."

"OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."

"Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."

"The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."

"It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product is pricey."

"The pricing is costly. It's costly to integrate with Office 365 and to go back and forth with the sales team."

"The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."

More OpenText Content Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM ECM?

The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP, Mic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM ECM?

The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM ECM?

The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenText Content Suite Platform?

We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into wher...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost is a significant factor that may deter medium-sized businesses from using OpenText extended ECM.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText Content Suite Platform?

The cost of the product could be improved. Currently, there are certain snags in document viewing, and communication from the pre-sales team is not clear. The expectation from the customer versus t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alfresco vs IBM ECM

Compared 18% of the time

IBM FileNet vs IBM ECM

Compared 17% of the time

Nuxeo vs IBM ECM

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs IBM ECM

Compared 9% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM ECM

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM ECM Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 13% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 12% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Content Management

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM

September 2025

Download IBM ECM product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Management

August 2025

Download OpenText Content Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share

Overview

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.

IBM Case Manager on Cloud

IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

IBM

OpenText Content Management offers seamless document storage and advanced search features. Ideal for organizations needing integration with SAP and other applications, it enhances workflows while ensuring security and compliance across multiple platforms.

OpenText Content Management stands out with its advanced integration capabilities, allowing seamless connectivity with SAP and other applications. Its enhanced security and permission systems safeguard information, vital for industries like banking, utilities, and oil & gas. Metadata categorization and customizable workflows aid in managing complex document lifecycles. Although improvements in visibility and integration with external tools are needed, the platform provides powerful collaboration tools, enhancing productivity. Users leverage document retention and WebReports features to ensure compliance. Challenges with support, performance during peak times, and architecture complexity are noted. Automation features and analytics require enhancement, alongside more user-friendly SmartUI and record management functionalities.

What key features define OpenText Content Management?

Powerful Search Functionality: Delivers rapid, accurate search results across content repositories.
Extensive Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP and other applications for enhanced workflow management.
Enhanced Security Systems: Advanced security measures and permission systems protect sensitive data.
Metadata for Document Categorization: Organizes documents efficiently with metadata tagging.
Customizable Workflows: Adaptable workflow options cater to diverse organizational needs.
Collaboration Tools: Boosts team productivity through efficient document management and tagging capabilities.
WebReports and Retention: Offers robust reporting and records retention to maintain compliance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Productivity: Streamlined collaboration tools enhance team efficiency.
Regulatory Compliance: Comprehensive retention management ensures adherence to policies.
Enhanced Security: Advanced protective measures secure critical information.
Seamless Integration: Consolidates data flow and operational processes.
Efficient Document Management: Lifecycle management improves organization and retrieval time.

OpenText Content Management is widely utilized in sectors such as banking, utilities, and oil & gas. It is implemented to manage software development projects, engineering documents, and workflow automation. Organizations leverage OpenText Extended ECM for document lifecycle management, post-project archiving, and records retention. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow allows efficient handling of document management across global operations, supporting information governance, tax return compilation, and capital projects.

OpenText

Sample Customers

KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group

ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project

Buyer's Guide

IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management

September 2025

Free Report: IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM ECM vs. OpenText Content Management report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.