IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

IBM and Salesforce are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while Salesforce is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Salesforce’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

649 Views
474 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

758 Views
588 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and MuleSoft Composer are in the enterprise integration category. IBM Cloud Pak is advantageous in enterprise-grade security, whereas MuleSoft Composer appeals to those who prioritize ease of use.

Features: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes advanced security features, extensive API management, and strong data governance. MuleSoft Composer focuses on seamless integration with cloud applications, low-code development, and pre-built connectors.

Room for Improvement: IBM Cloud Pak may improve by streamlining its setup process, simplifying its user interface, and enhancing integration speed. MuleSoft Composer could enhance enterprise security, expand its integration capabilities beyond Salesforce, and offer more advanced data governance options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer offers cloud-native deployment with a focus on quick setup and intuitive interfaces. In contrast, IBM Cloud Pak for Integration requires detailed configuration reflecting its extensive capabilities. IBM provides comprehensive customer service suited for complex enterprise needs, while MuleSoft offers responsive straightforward support for rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration tends to have higher setup costs due to its extensive capabilities and infrastructure requirements, potentially leading to substantial ROI for complex enterprise environments. MuleSoft Composer offers lower startup costs with a quicker ROI, appealing to organizations focusing on initial expenditures and faster operational gains.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (24th)

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (27th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 1.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"It is a stable solution."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

Cons

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 45% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 37% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 15% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 15% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 12% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

No data available

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.