We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and SAP Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our version supports containerized integration. I can write APIs, which can be moved into a testing environment without needing a forklift. It can check if APIs are compliant before moving them into production."
"The functionalities on offer are very good."
"It is easy to use and stable."
"It gives a holistic environment for us to set up the APIs and that's the main value that it adds. It gives end to end for us."
"The solution is very stable."
"API Connect is a very good platform for the development of APIs."
"The statistics component is easy to use."
"I have found IBM API Connect to be highly secure, efficient, easy to deploy, and has a great GUI. It can operate and integrate well with other vendors, such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft."
"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."
"The technical support services are good."
"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Support for this platform could still be improved. It also needs to have more levels of versatility. Its compatibility and integration with different platforms also need improvement."
"Components, like caching, should be implemented as policies, not requiring dependency on an external solution."
"It should be cheaper."
"Understanding the architecture, deployment criteria, and communication methods of the installation can be time-consuming."
"The administration of the user interface and the technical documentation are areas of concern in the solution where improvements are required."
"There are some performance issues and issues related to asynchronous APIs."
"The solution is overly complex."
"It would be nice to have a SaaS solution that can be deployed into the cloud."
"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."
"The product's UI could be faster."
"The instances are costly."
"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."
IBM API Connect is ranked 5th in API Management with 73 reviews while SAP Integration Suite is ranked 24th in API Management with 4 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 8.0, while SAP Integration Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Integration Suite writes "Has many add-on services and supports different authentication methods ". IBM API Connect is most compared with Apigee, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas SAP Integration Suite is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Axway AMPLIFY API Management. See our IBM API Connect vs. SAP Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
