Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE BladeSystem vs PowerEdge C comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.7
HPE BladeSystem offers high ROI, reduces costs, enhances performance, and delivers visible returns within two years.
Sentiment score
7.2
PowerEdge C offers competitive ROI with cost efficiency, faster performance than HP, and better support ease than Cisco.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
HPE BladeSystem service effectiveness varies by region, with Proactive Care recommended for advanced needs and improvements in support efficiency needed.
Sentiment score
6.6
PowerEdge C customer service is reliable and available 24/7, with some challenges in communication and support delay.
I would rate technical support from HPE as an eight on a scale from one to ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
HPE BladeSystem is praised for scalability, ease of expansion, and modularity, integrating well with existing infrastructure.
Sentiment score
7.6
PowerEdge C is praised for its scalability, adaptability, and robust performance across diverse organizations and varying workloads.
I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
HPE BladeSystem is stable and reliable, with minor issues like firmware updates and hardware glitches quickly resolved by support.
Sentiment score
8.2
PowerEdge C is highly stable with minimal downtime, achieving user ratings of 8-10, despite occasional minor challenges.
I do not have to call HP support frequently, which indicates its reliability.
 

Room For Improvement

HPE BladeSystem users seek better scalability, cloud integration, user interfaces, and support while addressing licensing, network, and pricing issues.
PowerEdge C requires improvements in compatibility, pricing, storage, memory, support, and stability to remain competitive and user-friendly.
To do any customization, we need to contact HP technical support, and the process is not user-friendly.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
This is one area where they can improve the performance of the server or implement some application improvements in the solution to make it easier for end users to implement properly.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers consider HPE BladeSystem's high initial cost justified, though licensing complexity and regional price adaptation are concerns.
PowerEdge C's pricing varies with configuration, offering a balance of affordability and quality, but some components can be costly.
With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for scalability when we need to contact different vendors for quotes to find competitive offers.
In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors.
 

Valuable Features

The HPE BladeSystem is praised for its scalability, manageability, compact design, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure.
PowerEdge C delivers high performance, easy management, and virtualization support, emphasizing affordability, scalability, and integration with VMware.
The integration of storage and networking components within the HPE BladeSystem is quite beneficial as it is easily interoperable if we are using the same system for monitoring with the same software, which eliminates interoperability issues.
The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use.
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem
Ranking in Blade Servers
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PowerEdge C
Ranking in Blade Servers
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Density Optimized Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.7%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PowerEdge C is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

Fatai Akinwande - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables you to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView feature
In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable.
Naveen Radhwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers great performance and customization for application servers
There are a few bugs in PowerEdge C that require some configurational settings to be done with the help of a support team when we reconfigure the solution. This is one area where they can improve the performance of the server or implement some application improvements in the solution to make it easier for end users to implement properly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...
What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?
The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?
With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...
What do you like most about PowerEdge C?
The solution provides good support and service.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PowerEdge C?
My experience with the pricing of this tool is that it's in mid-range. They have good competitors in the market who are offering better pricing, so there is scope for improvement in this area.
What needs improvement with PowerEdge C?
There are a few bugs in PowerEdge C that require some configurational settings to be done with the help of a support team when we reconfigure the solution. This is one area where they can improve t...
 

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EMIS Health
NxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. PowerEdge C and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.