Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Heap vs Indicative comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heap
Ranking in Web Analytics
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Indicative
Ranking in Web Analytics
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Web Analytics category, the mindshare of Heap is 4.9%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Indicative is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Heap4.9%
Indicative0.8%
Other94.3%
Web Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Aditya Sasmal - PeerSpot reviewer
Autocapture has revealed key drop-off points but usability and awareness need improvement
I have been using Heap in my product management journey to understand users and how and where a user actually drops off in a sales funnel for the past six months. I came across Heap when I was searching for a good user market research tool; first I was using Google Analytics to understand the customer review and the customer's mindset, where we can attract more and where customers are dropping, but once I started using Heap, its auto-capture is amazing and does wonders. All the features of Heap are very important, but the standout feature that I experienced was Autocapture, which does amazing work compared to its competitor, Google Analytics. Autocapture is valuable for me because it helps understand the customer journey from the first interaction with the ad or the first interaction with something we are selling to closing the deal. Autocapture does a great job, and this is one of the features I was looking for in Google Analytics and other platforms as well, so I definitely give credits to Heap.
Use Indicative?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Real Estate/Law Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Heap?
It's pretty costly, and they use the common model of impressions. It's impression-based pricing, which can be costly for websites with high traffic.
What needs improvement with Heap?
From a user perspective, customizing the interface could offer more flexibility. Customizing and branding the visuals a little bit better would take them to the next level.
What advice do you have for others considering Heap?
Heap is quite user-friendly, featuring a primarily no-code interface for primary stakeholders. Some technical skills are required for administrators. However, based on my experience, Heap's design ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zendesk, Marketo, Ernst & Young, Salesforce
Growth marketers, product managers, and data analysts at companies like TodayTix, Drops, Haven Life and NewsCred use Indicative to optimize customer conversion, engagement, and retention.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amplitude, Snowflake Computing, Google and others in Web Analytics. Updated: October 2025.
872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.