We performed a comparison between Group-IB Threat Intelligence and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition."
"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures."
"We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."
"Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."
"They have a very transparent roadmap for the product."
"The tool is managed from the cloud, because of which the maintenance is very low."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the insight it provides."
"The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."
"Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved."
"The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions."
"As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework."
"Microsoft itself is a major target for attacks and threats due to its size and popularity. That could be considered Microsoft's Achilles heel."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence should integrate with different platforms."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"It takes time for the support team to understand the issue, and they then respond with a delay at times, which causes a lot of trouble."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
"We encounter problems connecting the product deployed on the user endpoints with the servers."
"The price point is something they can improve slightly for those who don't have an M 365 E5."
"The price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the solution's price needs to be reduced."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Group-IB Threat Intelligence is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 24 reviews. Group-IB Threat Intelligence is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Group-IB Threat Intelligence writes "Easy to setup, highly stable and scalable and efficiently tracks threat actors and analyze their tactics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Group-IB Threat Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future, Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services, CrowdStrike Falcon, Mandiant Advantage and Anomali ThreatStream, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, Cisco Threat Grid, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and VirusTotal. See our Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.