Groundcover Observability Platform vs Sumo Logic Security comparison

Groundcover Observability Platform vs. Sumo Logic Security

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Groundcover Observability P...

Ranking in Log Management

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (44th), AI Observability (27th)

Sumo Logic Security

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (19th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Groundcover Observability Platform is 0.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sumo Logic Security is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sumo Logic Security	1.3%
Groundcover Observability Platform	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Ezekiel Oni

Software Engineer at FairMoney

Centralized observability has improved transaction monitoring and now reduces errors through faster troubleshooting

Groundcover Observability Platform is already very vast, and improving it requires proper training for even a software developer to be able to use it. A person in tech needs training to navigate the system. The UI is better, but it can be improved to include a more intuitive design that easily explains itself to users so that navigation is simpler. Many features are hidden, and you need someone who is experienced with the platform to direct you on how to view certain information or complete specific tasks and walk you through the process. It would be better if Groundcover focused more on simplifying the user interface and improving human-computer interactions of the dashboard to make it so easy for a new developer or specialist to navigate and get what they need quickly. Querying data from Groundcover is not easy if you do not have specific information. You cannot perform a wildcard search in the text box. If you go to the log and enter an error message, it will not bring any results for you. You must first specify the workload or pods you are looking for, then enter the error. You need to add tags and put in your strings to be able to search for your particular logs or errors. If you just put a wildcard search in the text box, it will not work and will appear as if there are no logs that relate to that search, when in reality the logs exist. Making it easier for developers, users, and specialists using Groundcover to navigate and get what they need without the help of an experienced person walking them through is very important. This improvement is not about functionality but more about making navigation easier.

Read full review

Migell Roberts

Senior Security Analyst at City Electric Supply Company

Security insights have enabled faster incident response and streamlined cross-team collaboration

To improve Sumo Logic Security, I would appreciate the tool being easier to use from a search perspective. For example, we have a few teams that want to use the tool itself, but they are not as savvy when it comes to creating searches from the core platform. I understand that Mobot has come out and is in the works, and it really does assist non-savvy users when it comes to querying the platform. As far as that is concerned, I wish that could be improved a bit more, but I do know that that is in the works. I would add that I wish for improved documentation. For example, we are using Sumo Playbooks and automation integrations along with that, but I have found that there has been a lack of documentation, very little to none at all when it comes to that. With regards to automation integrations as well, there are very few details included in them. I would also appreciate the AWS automation integrations to be more secure because currently, they are using access keys, which involves a user rather than roles, which is the security best practice recommended by AWS. I chose eight out of ten because to make it a nine or ten, I would lean heavily on the documentation. A lot of the times when we get around to configuring things such as playbooks or trying to understand playbooks, what I found was that documentation sometimes is not up to date or documentation is lacking. There are instances also where some security best practices are not being followed. So, if we are able to set up an integration that is not only secure, following security best practices, and has complete documentation, I believe it would alleviate the issue of having to go back and forth with support to check the documentation and things of that nature. My impression of the built-in threat intelligence feature in Sumo Logic Security is that it is comprehensive, but I would say that it could do a little bit better. For example, we have the TAXI feeds, which is STIX and TAXI integrated into the core platform, but the issue I am running into is that I am able to use that feed into a CSE alert; however, I am not able to see the contents of that feed. If I integrate CISA, which we do have integrated, I cannot see what IOCs are in that feed in the core platform, and I hope that is the case because, in order for us to better tune our alerts, we need to be able to see what is in the contents of that threat intelligence feed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Groundcover Observability Platform scales effectively with our organization's growth as we add new environments and everything works great, and the migration from our old product went very smoothly, allowing us to deprecate it rather quickly."

"Groundcover Observability Platform has impacted my organization positively as it is the primary way we use observability in our company, so it has a significant impact."

"We switched to Groundcover Observability Platform primarily because of the difficult query syntax in our previous solution, and we chose Groundcover for their business model as they don't charge based on log storage, they provide the infrastructure, and from a security perspective, the data stays in-house, which wasn't the case with our previous tool."

"Troubleshooting is very fast compared to manual investigation or using the other forms of logging that we used to have, and downtime and errors have decreased because we are able to see our performance and workload pods performing better, increase CPU and memory resources as soon as usage goes above the threshold, and make our application more scalable and improve performance metrics, reducing the number of errors in the application by at least 70%."

"Groundcover Observability Platform has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to pay only for what I use since it is stored in the cloud, and I do not need to pay for buckets of 1 gigabyte, 5 gigabytes, or other options."

"Sumo Logic is an easy solution to use. You can set it up very quickly, and it includes a lot of training videos."

"Before Sumo Logic, we had to login to every server and verify each error log to determine the problem, and with this tool, we provide every developer team the ability to find errors, then they come to us and ask for specific help."

"We use it to ingest Windows domain controller logs. We use this to monitor if anyone is placed in particular administration groups that potentially shouldn't be. It helps us keep track of people."

"We are able to diagnose problems before our customers."

"We can ingest logs and make reports out of them. It is a good tool which can help us monitor any issues."

"Pricing has been cheaper than some of the competing tools, like Splunk."

"For many of our services, we use Sumo Logic to track errors and send notifications to our Slack channel, if there are issues. Then, we have our support people monitoring this, and they can react quickly."

"We love the product and haven't had any bad experiences with it."

More Sumo Logic Security pros

Cons

"Querying data from Groundcover is not easy if you do not have specific information."

"I would assess the stability and reliability of Groundcover Observability Platform as an eight out of ten; while I haven't experienced issues personally, I am aware they occasionally encounter some challenges."

"I think it would be beneficial to see the body and content of API calls in the traces as a possible improvement."

"I would appreciate the ability to eliminate incident.io and have all the alerting in one place."

"From the network segmentation side, there is some discrepancy in log onboarding. The tool needs to improve direct API integrations, login integration, native login integration, etc."

"A lot of the times when we get around to configuring things such as playbooks or trying to understand playbooks, what I found was that documentation sometimes is not up to date or documentation is lacking."

"We would like to have some type of predefined setup for the logs, making the setup easier by default."

"It took a bit of trial and error to get it set up correctly based on everything we had to do. In the end, we had to send everything over HTTP, which was sort of a stop-gap."

"If you want to up your subscription through the AWS Marketplace, it can be difficult. You can't just go back to the AWS Marketplace, and say, "I want a bigger one now." You have to contact the sales team, then they do it on the back-end. This could definitely be improved."

"I would like to see improvement in the user experience when configuring things, ingesting logs, and creating ports."

"There needs to be improvement on imported data which can be used within Sumo Logic to do more advanced queries."

"I don't recommend this product."

More Sumo Logic Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace because it makes it a lot easier when we bill our customers. Rather than having to get multiple different sources of information then correlate a monthly bill for our customers, it is just included in the AWS usage charges."

"The product is costly."

"The pricing is good. It's not an issue for us."

"The license pricing model is based on the events that are processed through the solution."

"Purchasing the solution through the AWS Marketplace is very easy."

"Storing logs in Sumo Logic Security is charged GB-wise, which is a little higher than other products."

"The pricing is a little high, but for the features that we receive from Sumo Logic, it suits the price. For some small organizations, the price might be a little high."

"The only limit to the scalability of the product for us is how much we are willing to pay."

More Sumo Logic Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

34%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Outsourcing Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Groundcover Observability Platform?

What is your primary use case for Groundcover Observability Platform?

My main use case for Groundcover Observability Platform is for application logs, insights, workload observability, and visibility.

What advice do you have for others considering Groundcover Observability Platform?

Groundcover Observability Platform is a good platform and very good to use. I would rate this review as highly positive.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sumo Logic Security?

I would say that the pricing for Sumo Logic Security is in the medium part of the market. If you go to the well-known vendors such as Azure Sentinel or other tools like Splunk, you are going to fin...

What needs improvement with Sumo Logic Security?

I would say there are a few more things that Sumo Logic Security can improve on. It is not the tool; it is a technical part. From the app point of view, I would say when we need to include a few la...

What is your primary use case for Sumo Logic Security?

I use Sumo Logic Security.

Chronosphere vs Groundcover Observability Platform

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Dynatrace vs Groundcover Observability Platform

Compared 23% of the time

Datadog vs Groundcover Observability Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Groundcover Observability Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Coralogix vs Groundcover Observability Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Groundcover Observability Platform Competitors

Panther vs Sumo Logic Security

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Sumo Logic Security

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Sumo Logic Security

Compared 6% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Sumo Logic Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Sumo Logic Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Sumo Logic Security Competitors

Product Reports

Groundcover Observability Platform

Download Groundcover Observability Platform product report

Groundcover Observability Platform report

Sumo Logic Security

Download Sumo Logic Security product report

Overview

Groundcover Observability Platform empowers teams by providing crucial insights into application performance, ensuring system reliability and aiding proactive decision-making.

Groundcover Observability Platform offers comprehensive observability by harnessing cutting-edge technology. It transforms how teams manage systems by effectively monitoring, identifying issues, and simplifying troubleshooting processes. With a focus on scalability, it enables seamless integrations while ensuring robust analytics and real-time insights.

What are the key features of Groundcover Observability Platform?

Real-Time Monitoring: Instantly tracks application performance, providing up-to-date metrics.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing needs, ensuring flexibility.
Advanced Analytics: Offers deep insights into data for informed decision-making.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing tools to enhance workflows.
Error Detection: Quickly identifies and resolves issues to minimize downtime.

What benefits should users look for in Groundcover Observability Platform?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations by automating monitoring tasks.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes overhead by optimizing resource utilization.
Enhanced Reliability: Reduces outage occurrences with proactive management.
Better Decision Making: Data-driven insights enable strategic planning.

Groundcover Observability Platform is utilized across industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce to bolster infrastructure stability. In finance, it enhances transaction monitoring ensuring secure processing. Healthcare organizations leverage it to comply with regulatory standards while e-commerce platforms use it to guarantee seamless user experiences during high traffic events.

groundcover

Sumo Logic Security offers efficient event monitoring with customizable alerts, centralized log search, and real-time threat detection. It supports multi-cloud environments and integrates with threat intelligence, reducing workload with AI-driven analytics.

Sumo Logic Security empowers organizations with advanced logging and monitoring solutions, facilitating comprehensive security event management. Its robust log search and comparison features, combined with user-friendly dashboards, enable quick event analysis. The platform's multi-cloud support and real-time threat detection are notable features, seamlessly integrating automated log correlation and AI analytics to optimize user experience. Despite needing enhancements in querying and dashboard functionalities, Sumo Logic Security remains a reliable choice for application log management, IT asset visibility, and incident alerting. Organizations utilize it for threat detection, posture monitoring, and compliance audits, in platforms like AWS, focusing on security insights and performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sumo Logic Security?

Log Search: Facilitates centralized search and event analysis.
Custom Alerts: Offers flexibility in monitoring specific security events.
AI-driven Analytics: Reduces workload and speeds up response times.
Real-time Detection: Ensures swift threat identification and mitigation.
Multi-cloud Support: Enables integrations across cloud environments.

What benefits can users expect from Sumo Logic Security?

Ease of Implementation: Quick setup and deployment processes.
Cost-effective Pricing: Provides value-driven investment with supportive customer service.
Responsive UI: Enhances user experience and efficiency in operations.
Compliance Audits: Facilitates thorough security audits and reporting.

Organizations in industries like finance and technology implement Sumo Logic Security to maintain security and compliance, leveraging its advanced monitoring and alerting capabilities. Teams focus on application troubleshooting and forensic analysis, ensuring robust security posture and effective incident response across cloud-based environments.

Sumo Logic

Groundcover Observability Platform vs. Sumo Logic Security