Graylog vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Graylog and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. Graylog is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.4. Graylog holds a 6.5% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Graylog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Graylog

Read 21 Graylog reviews

9,223 Views
5,549 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 17 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

2,105 Views
847 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Graylog

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Graylog compete in the log management and security analytics category. Graylog seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced query and visualization capabilities.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers user-friendly administration, comprehensive auditing, and supports multiple log formats. Graylog provides advanced search functionality, customizable dashboards, and superior data analysis capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could enhance its reporting capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and update processes. Graylog faces challenges with scalability, alerting functions, and could also benefit from more seamless updates.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Graylog, though more challenging to set up, benefits from community support and thorough documentation, appealing to users who prefer deep customization.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 offers competitive pricing suitable for mid-sized organizations. Graylog, while potentially incurring higher setup costs, is valued for its extensive analytics and scalability, worthwhile for users needing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Graylog

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

19th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (19th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Graylog is 6.5%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Ivan Kokalovic

DevOps Engineer at Proton Technologies

Facilitates backend service monitoring with efficient log retrieval and API flexibility

Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline. It boosts the knowledge of sales and customer support teams by allowing them to see the backend operations without needing to read the code. Its API is flexible for visualization, and its powerful search engine efficiently handles large volumes of log data. Moreover, its stability, fast search capabilities, and compatibility with languages like ANSI SQL enhance its utility in IT infrastructure.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."

"It has data adapters and lookup tables that utilize HTTP calls to APIs."

"Graylog is very handy."

"The product is scalable. The solution is stable."

"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."

"Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline."

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

"Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful."

More Graylog pros

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"The reports that you can run are really nice."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect."

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

"It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."

"We haven't had any stability issues."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."

"More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great."

"More customization is always useful."

"I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."

"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second."

"There should be some user groups and an auto sign-in feature."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

More Graylog cons

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"The support needs improvement."

"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."

"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."

"Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems."

"On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"We're using the Community edition."

"I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."

"Having paid official support is wise for projects."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

More Graylog pricing and cost advice

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine Log360?

The product is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Graylog

Compared 36% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog

Compared 25% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog

Compared 11% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 24% of the time

Wazuh vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Graylog

June 2025

Download Graylog product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

June 2025

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Also Known As

Graylog2

No data available

Overview

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

Considerably faster analysis speeds.
More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
Lower cost than alternatives.
Full-scale customer service.
No expensive training or tool experts required.

Graylog

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

June 2025

Free Report: Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.