Graylog vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Graylog Logo
10,317 views|8,658 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
ManageEngine Logo
3,012 views|2,093 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Graylog and ManageEngine Log360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have scaled from a single machine installation (a VM with a Graylog + ES + MongoDB) to (2 Graylog + 2 ES + 3 MongoDB). This was done smoothly with a minimal impact on logging.""Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature.""Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching.""The product is scalable. The solution is stable.""Open source and user friendly.""This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them.""The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products.""Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default."

More Graylog Pros →

"The reports that you can run are really nice.""ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy.""It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect.""It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy.""The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already.""It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications.""We haven't had any stability issues.""You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

More ManageEngine Log360 Pros →

Cons
"Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes.""More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great.""It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community.""Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest.""Since container orchestration systems are popular and Graylog fits the niche well, perhaps they could officially support running in docker containers on Kubernetes as a StatefulSet as a use case. That way, the declarative nature of Kubernetes config files would document their best case deployment scenario-""We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient.""With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license.""Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."

More Graylog Cons →

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions.""On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits.""Their technical support should be improved.""The support needs improvement.""It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment.""The solution lacks some features when compared to other products.""The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment.""Most times log sheets are not assigned well."

More ManageEngine Log360 Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Having paid official support is wise for projects."
  • "I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."
  • "If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
  • "​You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."
  • "Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements.​"
  • "I use the free version of Graylog."
  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "We're using the Community edition."
  • More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a cost for each feature used."
  • "Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."
  • "My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."
  • "ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."
  • "Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."
  • More ManageEngine Log360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
    Top Answer:We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
    Top Answer:Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and… more »
    Top Answer:Deploying ManageEngine Log360 is challenging in terms of knowledge. They offer some out-of-the-box configurations, but determining the specific firewall or antivirus in use and importing logs from… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    10,317
    Comparisons
    8,658
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    802
    Rating
    7.3
    25th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,012
    Comparisons
    2,093
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Graylog2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

    • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
    • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
    • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
    • Lower cost than alternatives.
    • Full-scale customer service.
    • No expensive training or tool experts required.

    Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

    Sample Customers
    Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
    First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company22%
    Healthcare Company22%
    Non Profit11%
    University11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business79%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 25th in Log Management with 15 reviews. Graylog is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Rapid7 InsightIDR. See our Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.