No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gophish vs Voyage AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gophish
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Voyage AI
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
101st
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of Gophish is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Voyage AI is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Gophish0.2%
Voyage AI0.2%
Other99.6%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

JC
Administrador de sistemas informaticos en red at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Phishing awareness campaigns have improved training impact but still need smarter automation
I think Gophish could be improved with more automation, for instance. It is great that you can create templates, schedule them, and do everything you want in Gophish, but it would be nice to have a small integrated AI model with which you could create email templates and phishing templates. It would be nice if Gophish implemented artificial intelligence. I wish Gophish could provide more support and be more advanced and that they continue developing it because it seems that Gophish does not get many updates, and I think they need to implement more features. It is great because it is free, but it needs more features. It would be cool if there was an artificial intelligence model that could create phishing campaigns or templates or email templates for you integrated within Gophish. I would rate it a seven. It is quite good and free software, but it needs more substance. It also depends on the number of clients a company has; it may be necessary to launch Gophish in a staggered way, which I also think is a drawback Gophish has. The issue is that if there are many people being targeted, for example, 5,000 employees in a company and you send 5,000, it may be that sending so many messages gets blocked by the security systems companies have. I think that Gophish could also improve the message sending flows. I gave it a seven because there are things to improve and it is not perfect. As I said before, it would be nice if templates could be created with AI, integrated into Gophish using an API with Gemini or ChatGPT or whichever, but the point is that it would be nice if the sending flows at large scale were better managed. When you send a phishing campaign to 5,000 people, you have to send it in sections in a staggered way, for example: to these 5,000 people it is going to be sent between eight in the morning and four in the afternoon. If you send them all at once, the phishing may get blocked and then the campaign has no effect. I would like it if Gophish implemented more improvements because they are needed, as it is kind of a bit stagnant. I hope that in the future they add more improvements including creating personalized templates with artificial intelligence and improving the message sending flows.
Chirag Morajkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
Automation workflows have transformed resume screening and document chat into accurate, low-cost flows
Improvement can be made in the documentation aspect, which definitely needs to be updated or enhanced. I felt this need while using Voyage AI. I recognize that it is still growing, which is acceptable for a user like me, but enhancing documentation would greatly help developers or technical personnel. One more improvement could be native integration. For example, when using Voyage AI through make.com, which is an automation platform I regularly use, integration is possible only through APIs. This requires more time for setup and handling configurations. If Voyage AI had a native integration with make.com, similar to how OpenAI's ChatGPT operates, it would streamline the onboarding process very effectively. Other improvements needed for Voyage AI include enhanced documentation, native integration, and potentially video tutorials for each model or feature that they add. Short videos could significantly aid developers who might be lost or unfamiliar with updates since staying up to speed can be challenging.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With Gophish, I am able to work in a more appropriate way on phishing awareness, and I am also able to make employees aware in an easy and appropriate way because they see how a phishing attack works in a real way."
"Gophish, despite being a free tool, fits very well because it has all the features we need, from creating landing pages and creating the email to tracking the click traffic and the ingestion of information."
"Gophish has impacted my organization positively in terms of security awareness, as I have noticed fewer phishing incidents and more responses towards reporting phishing emails as specific improvements."
"The best feature that Gophish offers is its customizability; it makes everything look very professional and makes tracking very easy."
"Gophish is a good structure and a good technological innovation that deserves to be studied and much better known by the world because not everyone knows Gophish."
"Regarding my use of Gophish in this academic context, I found it extremely easy to use; you do not need to be a technical person with special skills to be able to handle it."
"Gophish has really improved security awareness in my organization."
"Gophish is stable and very reliable, and it has never let us down."
"The best feature Voyage AI offers is its text embedding, whose quality is very good and crucial, and I think Voyage AI has excelled in text understanding and contextual comprehension."
"Voyage AI has improved time, manual efforts, and employee satisfaction, and for this type of use case, Voyage AI is the best option available because the time it takes for answering questions reduces, employees no longer need to raise many tickets for simple queries, and it provides an answer in a single question and a single click without waiting for HR to respond."
"I have significantly increased my outputs around 60-70%, making them much more accurate than before, and the context and semantic meaning have increased substantially."
 

Cons

"Currently, we do not think Gophish requires much improvement other than a better graphical user interface."
"Gophish can be improved in that it is an open-source solution and there is a bottleneck issue related to sending emails."
"For Gophish, there is a lack of integration with MFA and cookie captures that are more advanced attack methods."
"Although the tool is very good, I think there could be some improvements, especially when it comes to leveraging AI for testing and also when it comes to the expansion beyond email phishing."
"The one improvement I would like to see in Gophish is the booting up of the images, as it sometimes takes a lot of time and could be improved."
"Gophish can be improved by adding more languages and maybe a web version for it, a SaaS platform."
"I believe that Gophish can be improved by increasing the number of possible integrations."
"The customer support needs improvement."
"Improvement can be made in the documentation aspect, which definitely needs to be updated or enhanced."
"I have not been frustrated with Voyage AI, but some enterprises will not share their data because they keep their data within their own infrastructure."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
26%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
52%
University
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise9
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gophish?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing shows that the setup cost is not very high; Gophish is completely free, as it is an open-source tool.
What needs improvement with Gophish?
I believe Gophish can be improved in a few areas. First, the user interface could be made more modern and beginner-friendly. The current setup is simple, but for a new user, campaign creation, land...
What is your primary use case for Gophish?
My main use case for Gophish is to run a phishing awareness campaign inside an organization in a safe and controlled way. For example, instead of waiting for a real attacker to send a fake email to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Voyage AI?
My experience with costing information, overall it is good as for as now. We got free tokens around 200 million at start. we paid approximately $0.12 per million tokens depending on the model. It i...
What needs improvement with Voyage AI?
Voyage AI's SDK support is limited to Python and JavaScript, so teams using other languages need custom wrappers to integrate it. Rate limiting also feels outdated, requiring manual static wait per...
What is your primary use case for Voyage AI?
My main use case for Voyage AI is converting text into embeddings so that it can be searched efficiently. I can provide a specific example of how I use Voyage AI for text-to-embedding through Retri...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Gophish vs. Voyage AI and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.