No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Cloud vs NTT Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (4th)
NTT Cloud
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
20th
Average Rating
5.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 4.9%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NTT Cloud is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Google Cloud4.9%
NTT Cloud1.2%
Other93.9%
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

AnjaneyaVara Prasad - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads
Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.
MC
Principal Cloud Engineer at mavenit
Good stability and scalability with excellent additional services
The features that are on offer are pretty standard. The pricing and services that surround the solution are great. For example, if we need to find a partner in a country where they do not have a cloud, they will help us find that partner. Solutions such as Amazon and Oracle do not offer this level of service. The solution has quite good documentation.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Kubernetes is one of the most successful orchestration platforms to manage applications."
"The price of Google Cloud is affordable compared to others services."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its security."
"I haven't had any trouble setting up Google Cloud."
"Because it's a cloud-based solution, we are always using the latest version."
"We have a development center in Manila with very experienced guys and they love Google Cloud."
"I like it because it's convenient, Google Cloud is also stable and scalable, and the technical support is good as well."
"The availability has been increased."
"The pricing and services that surround the solution are great, and if we need to find a partner in a country where they do not have a cloud, they will help us find that partner, which is a level of service that solutions such as Amazon and Oracle do not offer."
"The initial setup process is more accessible than one of its competitors."
 

Cons

"In terms of Google services, providing more hypervisors would be beneficial."
"There are occasionally things which are inconvenient. For example, uploading pictures or files then requires you to transfer to a different folder."
"To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging."
"The ease-of-use could be improved for less technical users."
"Google is slower to support .NET."
"Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible."
"They could always offer even more storage at the base level."
"Google Cloud lacks some tools for database migration. I've only used MySQL and AWS in my career, so those are the only ones I can compare. AWS has a database migration tool that you can integrate with a cloud backup, so can take that backup and restore it in the AWS public cloud, but it's not the same with Google Cloud."
"NTT Cloud’s performance could be better."
"The solution needs to provide a bigger portfolio of services. The solution could use more advanced monitoring."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The service is cheap and I give it a seven out of ten for the cost."
"Pricing is high compared to other solutions."
"Google Cloud could be cheaper."
"I don't pay for the license. For me, it's completely free."
"Its cost depends on specific use cases."
"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as an eight."
"The solution is cheaper than AWS."
"The solution is cheaper than Azure."
"I rate the product’s pricing a four out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Construction Company
6%
University
12%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Insurance Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise38
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?
I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?
My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...
What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?
On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

GCP
OpSource IaaS Cloud, NTT IaaS Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd., DNP Information Systems Co. Ltd., Independent Data Services (Asia) Sdn. Bhd., Toshiba Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. NTT Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.