Google Cloud Storage and Microsoft Azure Block Storage are leading competitors in cloud storage solutions. Users appreciate Google Cloud Storage's reliability and support but find Microsoft Azure Block Storage's extensive feature set compelling.
Features: Google Cloud Storage excels in reliability, seamless integration with Google's ecosystem, and straightforward deployment. Microsoft Azure Block Storage is praised for its advanced features, robust security protocols, and versatile storage solutions.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Google Cloud Storage could enhance its scalability, offer more competitive pricing, and improve its feature set. Microsoft Azure Block Storage receives feedback about improving ease of use, reducing complexity in some functionalities, and simplifying its deployment process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment process and efficient customer service. Microsoft Azure Block Storage, despite its slightly more complex deployment, offers comprehensive support that assists users in navigating its features effectively.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage is often seen as budget-friendly with reasonable ROI. Microsoft Azure Block Storage, while potentially higher in initial setup costs, is considered worth the investment due to its rich feature set and high ROI by most users.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
I think the technical support by Google is good; the articles and troubleshooting are adequate.
Support quality is good, but the main issue is the delay in handling tickets.
I had contacted them before and they replied rapidly.
Ours is a government enterprise organization, so we have a premium support agreement with Microsoft, and they give us the best support.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
The ability to scale is well-supported.
It is a significant advantage of the product.
We are on a premium plan, which should handle scalability automatically.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
It isn't as stable as sound storage systems in a premise environment.
Overall, the stability is very good.
None of the other storage vendors have all these features so easily manageable and fast to set up as Block Storage.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
In the future, I would like to see additional features in Google Cloud Storage such as integrating Gemini to function as a chat for finding information, or OCR, or reading the content in my files for searching purposes.
Its compatibility with various platforms could be enhanced to allow for a seamless operation across different cloud environments.
Some alternatives are cheaper and available for long trial periods before the payment.
Enabling SFTP on Microsoft Azure Block Storage didn’t allow us to get the IP address, as Azure doesn’t support it.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
For medium-sized companies, especially when discussing cost and scalability, it can be quite expensive.
The cost for Azure Data Factory, utilized for intensive data migration, was high but expected, as it's a one-time activity.
It is reasonable, however, it can be cheaper.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
It has helped optimize costs because I store it in free tiers, resulting in no charge.
The tool allows me to download to my device, control access, and manage data with ease.
The world is now directed toward a centralized data platform or Fabric to build a data lake house for data engineering, which keeps all data in a centralized place that's beneficial for the governance layer and unified governance.
The ability to increase and scale out is really easy, allowing us to manage a large amount of data with reduced dependency on scalability issues.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Cloud Storage | 7.9% |
| Microsoft Azure Block Storage | 1.9% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
Massively scalable cloud storage for your applications
Store and help protect your data. Get durable, highly available data storage across the globe and pay only for what you use.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
