Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Google and Microsoft are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6, while Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Google holds a 10.3% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Read 10 Google Cloud Storage Nearline reviews
  • 1,675 Views
  • 1,417 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Read 54 Microsoft Azure Object Storage reviews
  • 470 Views
  • 319 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Microsoft Azure Object Storage are two prominent solutions for cloud storage. Users indicate higher satisfaction with Microsoft Azure Object Storage due to its robust features, but Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers competitive pricing and reliable support.

Features: Google Cloud Storage Nearline provides efficient data retrieval, durable storage, and a user-friendly API. Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers scalable storage solutions, strong integration capabilities, and advanced features for extensive integration.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Google Cloud Storage Nearline could benefit from faster data access times, improved security measures, and enhanced global reach. Microsoft Azure Object Storage could improve its global reach, offer more intuitive access management, and provide faster deployment times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage Nearline receives positive feedback for its straightforward deployment process and commendable customer service. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, while slightly more complex to deploy, is appreciated for its extensive support resources and comprehensive problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is praised for its cost-effectiveness and substantial ROI for small to medium-sized data requirements. Microsoft Azure Object Storage, though considered more expensive, delivers a high ROI due to its extensive feature set and better data management solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is 10.3%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

AmitKumar36 - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, seamless, and scalable document storage with AI and analytics integration, providing reliable support
The solution is very flexible in terms of scalability. It is an online service, so we can scale it anytime with some pre-planning. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. As for the users using this solution in our organization, that varies according to what time of the day and what day it is, but it goes around 2,000 to 3,000 users. The maximum is about 3,000. On average, it stays somewhere between 2,000 and 1,800.
Read full review
Akram Zabat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides versatile data storage solutions with a simple setup and easy to use
It's similar to S3 for AWS. The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial. For example, you can transform data from relational databases, flatten it, and store it in Object storage to save space within the databases. If I want to save data and do not require legacy access, it's a good solution, for instance, to migrate archives from databases to Object storage. This can also be used for business intelligence purposes. Having a storage solution for data makes it the best place to store it. Azure has its own solution for StatsQ Web Apps.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution."
"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."
"It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow."
"The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline."
"Nearline is highly stable."
"The best part of Nearline storage is the ability to take backups at optimal costs and its availability across multiple regions."
"Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."
"The most valuable aspect of Google Cloud Storage Nearline is its integration with the wider Google Cloud ecosystem."
More Google Cloud Storage Nearline pros
"Azure cloud services are quite an easy solution with many tools to operate, such as the CLI, software development kit, and the portal."
"Object Storage's best features are the soft delete option and the retention period."
"It is easy to use, and we use it for backup and remote desktop access. It is working fine."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure."
"The benefits of using Microsoft Azure Object Storage include being able to keep all unstructured data in the storage, allowing users to access it from anywhere by configuring the storage explorer in their system, based on the policies we apply during the implementation."
"Object Storage's best feature is that it's easy to deploy."
"The metadata that the solution provides is quite valuable for us. If we need to analyze the latest data from a particular department or particular user, we can simply query through the metadata we store in Azure Object Storage and simply fetch those records which are maybe one day or one month old. this metadata storage is really handy for us."
"The features of Microsoft Azure Object Storage that are most valuable are the ones providing encryption. Access is more controlled using private endpoints and SaaS token keys. Many access control features exist."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pros
 

Cons

"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."
"The pricing is quite high."
"From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline."
"Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."
"One area that needs improvement is the documentation, which I find to be disorganized and not user-friendly."
"They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files."
"The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud."
"The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved."
More Google Cloud Storage Nearline cons
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days."
"I think if the tool puts features that only exist in the easy copying area through Azure Storage Explorer, so introducing such features in Microsoft Azure Object Storage can make it more user-friendly."
"Technical support should be a little bit faster."
"One of the things that are currently important is consistency. To achieve this, another database called Cosmos DB is available. We want to have a similar consistency to the one in Cosmos DB but at a cheaper price."
"Our current Azure setup faces challenges with API connectivity, particularly due to misconfigurations related to changes in Azure Graph."
"Improvements should be made as per customer requirements."
"Object Storage's integration with other backup software could be improved."
"Currently, the Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer is just a Windows app. I don't know if it's available on mobile, such as iOS or Android. I don't know if the app is mobile-friendly. It should be mobile-friendly."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."
"Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."
"You can download the application from Microsoft free of charge."
"The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
"The tool has a pay-per-use pricing model...There is no need to pay extra money for the licensing costs since the price is based on the storage you consume."
"Currently, it is a flexible price policy."
"The price will be more competitive when we increase the time spent using the tool. For our company's size range, I think the price is okay."
"The tool's licensing costs are annual. It should be made reasonable."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is not expensive."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
23%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
The storage and access cost of Nearline are considered optimal compared to other cloud storage solutions, although I lack a clear view of other cloud storage costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage Nearline?
From a storage standpoint, it would be beneficial if the retrieval cost could be optimized, as it is comparatively higher than storage costs in Nearline.
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The layout of Microsoft is professional.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
I can't share a lot about the costs. I am focused on the technical aspect. It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value. If I want to test a product before deploying i...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
In terms of compliance and security, everything is fine. I do not know of any immediate needs for improvement. However, one potential area for improvement is the replication process. Some clients c...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Compared 97% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline Logo
Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline
Compared 3% of the time
More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Competitors
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 47% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 30% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 12% of the time
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage Logo
Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Compared 11% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline
June 2025
Google Cloud Storage Nearline reportDownload Google Cloud Storage Nearline product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure Object Storage
June 2025
Microsoft Azure Object Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure Object Storage product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
 

Overview

A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

Google

REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

  • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
  • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
  • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
  • Power big data analytics
  • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Buyer's Guide
Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
June 2025
Free Report: Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.