"The most valuable features are stability and supportability... You want to have something that's up and running and stable, something that's not going to crash. But if we do have an issue, we can get somebody for technical support who can help us work through the problems."
"The integrated solution approach reduces our TCO tremendously because we are able to focus on innovation instead of operations."
"The best system I've ever used is Red Hat, in terms of its ability and consistency of the operating system. Other than that, the vast majority of applications that I had, you can deploy Red Hat with the support of the vast majority of applications. We don't have many issues with the OS, the support is very good."
"This is a very robust product that doesn't require a lot of handling. It just works."
"I like the fact that most of the system configuration is Namespace so it's easy to get to and easy to configure, and most of it still uses text documents. Not all of it's a menu-driven-type entry. I also like the fact that it's a very standard file system layout so it's easy to navigate."
"The most valuable features are the specification and technical guides, they are most important the security."
"The most valuable feature is the Identity Management. You pay almost the same subscription cost for normal RHEL and you get the central Identity Management. You would need to pay much more if you were using other applications or products like Active Directory from Microsoft."
"One of the most important features is the package manager. It provides the ability to very easily roll back transactions when something has gone wrong. It is an easy-to-use tool that helps me in situations where something unexpected has happened. I found that this was one of the solution's major advantages over other distributions."
"Chrome Enterprise is really easy to deploy and manage."
"This solution is user-friendly with security features detecting if there is suspicious activity on the browser. There is a lot of extensions we can use to provide us with good coverage."
"It works. It is stable, unlike other versions of Windows. It is easy to use and intuitive for the most part."
"I like that it's stable and secure."
"The install was easy for this solution."
"Windows 10 is easy to use."
"It is stable, scalable, and secure. It is also easy to install."
"Windows 10 is quick."
"There was no installation necessary."
"The installation is very easy and takes approximately 30 minutes."
"It is mostly better than other solutions. However, it is sometimes difficult for disaster recovery, so we have to plan accordingly."
"In the past and with older versions, you couldn't expand the root file system without rebooting the server or restarting the operating system. That is something that they have actually corrected now, which is great. They corrected that issue somewhere around RHEL 7."
"Their pricing and documentation can be improved."
"Security could be increased."
"The accessibility to the resources could be more widespread. We have to put a lot of effort into finding indigenous information on the site. For example, the license information is convoluted. This information should be easier for customers to access."
"I would mostly like to see improvement around corporate messaging. When Red Hat 8 came out, and Red Hat decided to change, it inverted the relationship between Red Hat and CentOS. This caused my customers who had a CentOS to RHEL development to production workflow quite a bit of heartburn that several of them are still working out. A lot of that probably could have been avoided through better messaging."
"The price is something that can be improved, as they are still being undercut."
"It could be a bit more user-friendly. It could also be cheaper."
"In an upcoming release, the enhanced troubleshooting feature needs to improve to be able to identify the issues for the use case and for the user experience."
"You still need to have a pretty good understanding of GCP to deploy it properly."
"There is room for improvement when it comes to the licensing."
"The updates could be improved. Sometimes when we update, there are instances where it fails or crashes."
"The updates take a lot of time to complete, and they could be faster."
"Windows 10 could improve its security and they have not added anything extra to the solution from the previous versions."
"I would prefer it if the solution was cheaper."
"There are no missing features."
"The solution could be faster and demonstrate better performance. I"
"It could benefit from more integration."
More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Chrome Enterprise is ranked 10th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 2 reviews while Windows 10 is ranked 3rd in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 206 reviews. Google Chrome Enterprise is rated 7.0, while Windows 10 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Chrome Enterprise writes "Portable, inexpensive, and easy to manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows 10 writes "Modern apps and features like Windows Hello provide a consumer-friendly experience". Google Chrome Enterprise is most compared with , whereas Windows 10 is most compared with Windows Server, Ubuntu Linux, openSUSE Leap, Oracle Solaris and Neverware CloudReady. See our Google Chrome Enterprise vs. Windows 10 report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
